Nag D, Garg R K, Agarwal A
Department of Neurology, King George's Medical College, Lucknow.
J Assoc Physicians India. 1998 Feb;46(2):185-8.
Study was conducted to compare the pharmacokinetic profile of conventional and slow-release carbamazepine formulations in Indian epileptic patients. Twenty consecutive untreated patients of partial seizures were randomly assigned to receive either conventional carbamazepine (200 mg thrice a day) or slow-release carbamazepine formulation (200 mg thrice a day), 10 patients in each group. The serum carbamazepine concentrations were measured on 10th day and 20th day of treatment. The blood samples were collected before the morning dose. In the conventional treatment group five patients experienced side effects as compared to two in the slow-release group. On 10th day mean serum carbamazepine levels were significantly higher in conventional group (8.27 +/- 1.39 micrograms/ml) in comparison to slow release group (4.28 +/- 3.89 micrograms/ml). The difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). On 20th day carbamazepine levels fell significantly in conventional group only (8.27 +/- 1.39 micrograms/ml to 5.76 +/- 2.32 micrograms/ml, p < 0.05). At this stage the difference in mean carbamazepine levels of two groups became insignificant (p < 0.05). In conclusion, controlled release formulations provide more steady serum concentrations of carbamazepine along with better tolerability.
开展了一项研究,以比较传统卡马西平制剂和缓释卡马西平制剂在印度癫痫患者中的药代动力学特征。连续20例未经治疗的部分性发作患者被随机分配接受传统卡马西平(每日三次,每次200毫克)或缓释卡马西平制剂(每日三次,每次200毫克),每组10例患者。在治疗的第10天和第20天测量血清卡马西平浓度。在早晨服药前采集血样。在传统治疗组中,有5例患者出现副作用,而缓释组为2例。在第10天,传统组的平均血清卡马西平水平(8.27±1.39微克/毫升)显著高于缓释组(4.28±3.89微克/毫升)。差异具有统计学意义(p<0.05)。仅在第20天,传统组的卡马西平水平显著下降(从8.27±1.39微克/毫升降至5.76±2.32微克/毫升,p<0.05)。在此阶段,两组的平均卡马西平水平差异变得不显著(p<0.05)。总之,控释制剂可提供更稳定的卡马西平血清浓度,且耐受性更好。