Wolf P, May T, Tiska G, Schreiber G
Epilepsy Centre Bethel, Bielefeld, Fed. Rep. of Germany.
Arzneimittelforschung. 1992 Mar;42(3):284-8.
The bioavailability and serum level fluctuations of three carbamazepine (CBZ, CAS 298-46-4) slow release preparations marketed in Germany were compared in patients with epilepsy. Ten patients who were on CBZ monotherapy and had reached a steady state with morning trough levels above 10 micrograms/ml received all 3 preparations in sequential 3-day periods. On the 3rd day of each period, a 24-h serum drug level profile was determined. Only minimal differences could be found. One preparation had a significantly higher AUC than one of the others (p less than 0.05), and this difference seemed to be correlated with higher fluctuations of serum levels and, especially, an increased Cmax. Although the group differences are minimal, more important differences could be observed individually. One patient had, with one of the three preparations, a reduction in seizure frequency but simultaneously developed important signs and symptoms of toxicity. It is concluded that all 3 preparations are equally suitable for chronic antiepileptic drug treatment. In a well-controlled patient, however, interchange between preparations is not advisable as their kinetics in individual patients can be sufficiently different to cause toxicity or seizure relapse.
在癫痫患者中比较了德国市场上销售的三种卡马西平(CBZ,化学物质登记号298 - 46 - 4)缓释制剂的生物利用度和血清水平波动情况。10名接受卡马西平单一疗法且早晨谷浓度高于10微克/毫升并已达到稳态的患者,在连续3天的时间段内依次接受了所有3种制剂。在每个时间段的第3天,测定了24小时血清药物水平曲线。仅发现了极小的差异。一种制剂的曲线下面积(AUC)显著高于其他制剂中的一种(p < 0.05),并且这种差异似乎与血清水平的更高波动相关,尤其是与更高的峰浓度(Cmax)相关。尽管组间差异极小,但个体间可观察到更重要的差异。一名患者使用三种制剂中的一种时,癫痫发作频率降低,但同时出现了重要的毒性体征和症状。结论是所有3种制剂同样适用于慢性抗癫痫药物治疗。然而,对于病情控制良好的患者,不建议在不同制剂之间换药,因为它们在个体患者中的动力学可能差异很大,足以导致毒性反应或癫痫复发。