Suppr超能文献

杜克B期患者应接受辅助治疗吗?统计学视角。

Should Dukes' B patients receive adjuvant therapy? A statistical perspective.

作者信息

Buyse M, Piedbois P

机构信息

International Institute for Drug Development, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Semin Oncol. 2001 Feb;28(1 Suppl 1):20-4. doi: 10.1016/s0093-7754(01)90247-7.

Abstract

The benefit of adjuvant therapy, such as 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) combined with leucovorin, is a matter of debate for patients with Dukes' B colon cancer. Several approaches have been taken to address this issue. Initially, studies were conducted to assess treatment benefits in both Dukes' B and Dukes' C patients. These studies identified an overall benefit of adjuvant treatment and enrolled enough Dukes' C patients to determine a treatment benefit for adjuvant 5-FU/leucovorin in this subpopulation. However, the individual studies were insufficiently powered to detect a treatment benefit in Dukes' B patients. An analysis of four separate studies (National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel project) compared the benefit of adjuvant treatment in Dukes' B patients with that in Dukes' C patients and showed similar relative reductions in mortality and disease-free survival in Dukes' B and in Dukes' C patients. The Liver Infusion Meta-Analysis Group also reported similar relative benefits from a portal vein infusion of 5-FU-based chemotherapy in Dukes' B and Dukes' C patients. The International Multicenter Pooled Analysis of Colon Cancer Trials B2 study, which combined data from patients with Dukes' B colon cancer in five separate trials, failed to show a statistically significant benefit of adjuvant 5-FU/leucovorin compared with surgery alone. We review the advantages and limitations of different approaches to detect treatment benefits in patients with Dukes' B colon cancer, and we argue that there is a need for a meta-analysis of all adjuvant trials to reliably address this question.

摘要

对于Dukes' B期结肠癌患者而言,辅助治疗(如5-氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)联合亚叶酸)的益处存在争议。人们已采取多种方法来解决这一问题。最初,开展了一些研究以评估Dukes' B期和Dukes' C期患者的治疗益处。这些研究确定了辅助治疗的总体益处,并纳入了足够数量的Dukes' C期患者,以确定辅助性5-FU/亚叶酸在该亚组人群中的治疗益处。然而,各项单独研究的样本量不足以检测出Dukes' B期患者的治疗益处。一项对四项独立研究(国家外科辅助乳腺和肠道项目)的分析比较了Dukes' B期患者与Dukes' C期患者辅助治疗的益处,结果显示Dukes' B期和Dukes' C期患者在死亡率和无病生存率方面的相对降低幅度相似。肝脏灌注荟萃分析组也报告称,在Dukes' B期和Dukes' C期患者中,门静脉灌注基于5-FU的化疗具有相似的相对益处。结肠癌试验B2的国际多中心汇总分析研究合并了五项独立试验中Dukes' B期结肠癌患者的数据,结果显示与单纯手术相比,辅助性5-FU/亚叶酸并无统计学上的显著益处。我们回顾了检测Dukes' B期结肠癌患者治疗益处的不同方法的优缺点,并认为有必要对所有辅助试验进行荟萃分析,以可靠地解决这一问题。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验