• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人类和猴子辨别不同频率和振幅振动刺激的能力:神经活动与心理测量之间的相关性。

Capacities of humans and monkeys to discriminate vibratory stimuli of different frequency and amplitude: a correlation between neural events and psychological measurements.

作者信息

LaMotte R H, Mountcastle V B

出版信息

J Neurophysiol. 1975 May;38(3):539-59. doi: 10.1152/jn.1975.38.3.539.

DOI:10.1152/jn.1975.38.3.539
PMID:1127456
Abstract

The capacities of monkeys and humans to discriminate between mechanical sinusoids differing in amplitude or frequency were measured in a two-alternative, forced-choice task. The difference limen for amplitude discrimination for both species remained constant near 10% of the standard amplitude over the range of 17-30 dB, relative to detection threshold. Equal subjective intensity curves in the 20-40 Hz range were determined at 20 and 29 dB, relative to detection threshold. These curves followed the threshold curve and were identical for the two species. The difference limen for frequency discrimination averaged 1.8 Hz for humans and 2.7 Hz for monkeys; the range of values for the two species overlapped nearly completely. The small sizes of these difference limens indicate, we believe, the capacity of highly trained individuals of either species to ascertain small differences in the temporal order of somesthetic stimuli and of the neural events evoked by them. In one series of experiments we demonstrated that subjects of both species possess two threshold for two different aspects of flutter-vibration which are displaced from each other along the intensive continuum. For either species, the minimum level of stimulus amplitude required for threshold frequency discrimination is about 8 dB above that sufficient for detection. This difference in amplitude is called the atonal interval and matches that observed between absolute and tuning thresholds for quickly adapting, mechanoreceptor afferents (the Meissner afferents) which innervate the glabrous skin of the monkey hand. These and previous findings have permitted a number of direct correlations between behavioral and neural events as regards the sense of flutter. The neural codes for the intensity and frequency of flutter appear to be different. The capacity to detect the presence of a mechanical sinusoid and the capacity to judge its subjective intensity are likely to depend on criterion levels of activity in the total population of Meissner afferents, the former on the appearance of any activity (absolute threshold) in a small population of the most sensitive of these fibers and the latter on the overall size of the active population of neuronal elements at each level of amplitude. The total activity in the relevant neural population elicited by sinusoids of increasing amplitude defines a prothetic continuum along which subjects can judge the magnitude of sensation..

摘要

在一项二选一的强制选择任务中,测量了猴子和人类区分振幅或频率不同的机械正弦波的能力。相对于检测阈值,在17 - 30分贝的范围内,两种物种的振幅辨别阈限在标准振幅的10%左右保持恒定。相对于检测阈值,在20 - 40赫兹范围内,分别在20分贝和29分贝处确定了等主观强度曲线。这些曲线与阈值曲线相符,且两种物种的曲线相同。人类的频率辨别阈限平均为1.8赫兹,猴子为2.7赫兹;两种物种的值范围几乎完全重叠。我们认为,这些辨别阈限较小表明,两种物种中训练有素的个体有能力确定躯体感觉刺激及其引发的神经事件在时间顺序上的微小差异。在一系列实验中,我们证明两种物种的受试者对于颤振的两个不同方面都有两个阈值,这两个阈值在强度连续体上相互错开。对于任何一种物种,频率辨别阈值所需的最小刺激振幅水平比检测所需的水平高约8分贝。这种振幅差异被称为无调区间,与支配猴子手部无毛皮肤的快速适应机械感受器传入纤维(迈斯纳传入纤维)的绝对阈值和调谐阈值之间的差异相匹配。这些发现以及之前的研究结果使得在颤振感觉方面行为和神经事件之间建立了许多直接关联。颤振强度和频率的神经编码似乎不同。检测机械正弦波存在的能力以及判断其主观强度的能力可能取决于迈斯纳传入纤维总体群体中的活动标准水平,前者取决于这些纤维中一小部分最敏感纤维出现任何活动(绝对阈值),而后者取决于每个振幅水平上活跃神经元群体的总体大小。振幅增加的正弦波在相关神经群体中引发的总活动定义了一个辅助连续体,受试者可以沿着这个连续体判断感觉的大小。

相似文献

1
Capacities of humans and monkeys to discriminate vibratory stimuli of different frequency and amplitude: a correlation between neural events and psychological measurements.人类和猴子辨别不同频率和振幅振动刺激的能力:神经活动与心理测量之间的相关性。
J Neurophysiol. 1975 May;38(3):539-59. doi: 10.1152/jn.1975.38.3.539.
2
Perceived pitch of vibrotactile stimuli: effects of vibration amplitude, and implications for vibration frequency coding.振动触觉刺激的感知音高:振动幅度的影响及其对振动频率编码的意义。
J Physiol. 1990 Dec;431:403-16. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1990.sp018336.
3
Disorders in somesthesis following lesions of parietal lobe.顶叶病变后躯体感觉障碍。
J Neurophysiol. 1979 Mar;42(2):400-19. doi: 10.1152/jn.1979.42.2.400.
4
A model accounting for effects of vibratory amplitude on responses of cutaneous mechanoreceptors in macaque monkey.一种解释振动幅度对猕猴皮肤机械感受器反应影响的模型。
J Physiol. 1982 Feb;323:43-64. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1982.sp014060.
5
Human tactile detection thresholds: modification by inputs from specific tactile receptor classes.人类触觉检测阈值:特定触觉感受器类别的输入对其的调节
J Physiol. 1977 Nov;272(2):415-33. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp012052.
6
Frequency discrimination in the sense of flutter: psychophysical measurements correlated with postcentral events in behaving monkeys.颤动意义上的频率辨别:与行为猴子中央后回事件相关的心理物理学测量
J Neurosci. 1990 Sep;10(9):3032-44. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.10-09-03032.1990.
7
[Equal-sensation contours and a threshold curve for low-frequency vibrotactile stimuli on the glabrous skin of the human hand].[人手无毛皮肤低频振动触觉刺激的等感觉轮廓线和阈值曲线]
Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 1982 Aug;53(3):169-73.
8
Cutaneous mechanoreceptors in macaque monkey: temporal discharge patterns evoked by vibration, and a receptor model.猕猴的皮肤机械感受器:振动诱发的时间发放模式及感受器模型
J Physiol. 1982 Feb;323:21-41. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1982.sp014059.
9
Time course and action spectrum of vibrotactile adaptation.振动触觉适应的时间进程和作用光谱。
Somatosens Mot Res. 1990;7(2):205-21. doi: 10.3109/08990229009144707.
10
Impairment of human proprioception by high-frequency cutaneous vibration.高频皮肤振动对人体本体感觉的损害。
J Physiol. 2007 Jun 15;581(Pt 3):971-80. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.126854. Epub 2007 Apr 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Effector-dependent neural representations of perceptual decisions independent of motor actions and sensory modalities.与运动动作和感觉模态无关的感知决策的效应器依赖神经表征。
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2025 May 22;3. doi: 10.1162/IMAG.a.11. eCollection 2025.
2
Disentangling Temporal and Rate Codes in the Primate Somatosensory Cortex.解析灵长类感觉皮层中的时间和率码
J Neurosci. 2024 Sep 18;44(38):e0036242024. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0036-24.2024.
3
Auditory clicks elicit equivalent temporal frequency perception to tactile pulses: A cross-modal psychophysical study.
听觉滴答声引发与触觉脉冲等效的时间频率感知:一项跨模态心理物理学研究。
Front Neurosci. 2022 Sep 9;16:1006185. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.1006185. eCollection 2022.
4
Temporally Local Tactile Codes Can Be Stored in Working Memory.暂时局部的触觉编码可以存储在工作记忆中。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 May 27;16:840108. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.840108. eCollection 2022.
5
Frequency Shapes the Quality of Tactile Percepts Evoked through Electrical Stimulation of the Nerves.频率塑造通过神经电刺激引发的触觉感知质量。
J Neurosci. 2022 Mar 9;42(10):2052-2064. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1494-21.2021. Epub 2022 Jan 24.
6
The Importance of Accounting for Movement When Relating Neuronal Activity to Sensory and Cognitive Processes.当将神经元活动与感觉和认知过程相关联时,考虑运动的重要性。
J Neurosci. 2022 Feb 23;42(8):1375-1382. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1919-21.2021. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
7
Proprioceptive sensitivity to imposed finger deflections.对强制手指弯曲的本体感觉敏感性。
J Neurophysiol. 2022 Feb 1;127(2):412-420. doi: 10.1152/jn.00513.2021. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
8
Humans Use a Temporally Local Code for Vibrotactile Perception.人类使用时间局部代码进行振动触觉感知。
eNeuro. 2021 Nov 4;8(6). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0263-21.2021. Print 2021 Nov-Dec.
9
Normative values of the vibration perception thresholds at finger pulps and metatarsal heads in healthy adults.健康成年人指腹和跖骨头部振动感觉阈值的正常值。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 6;16(4):e0249461. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249461. eCollection 2021.
10
Of mice and monkeys: Somatosensory processing in two prominent animal models.关于老鼠和猴子:两种突出的动物模型中的躯体感觉处理。
Prog Neurobiol. 2021 Jun;201:102008. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2021.102008. Epub 2021 Feb 12.