LaMotte R H, Mountcastle V B
J Neurophysiol. 1975 May;38(3):539-59. doi: 10.1152/jn.1975.38.3.539.
The capacities of monkeys and humans to discriminate between mechanical sinusoids differing in amplitude or frequency were measured in a two-alternative, forced-choice task. The difference limen for amplitude discrimination for both species remained constant near 10% of the standard amplitude over the range of 17-30 dB, relative to detection threshold. Equal subjective intensity curves in the 20-40 Hz range were determined at 20 and 29 dB, relative to detection threshold. These curves followed the threshold curve and were identical for the two species. The difference limen for frequency discrimination averaged 1.8 Hz for humans and 2.7 Hz for monkeys; the range of values for the two species overlapped nearly completely. The small sizes of these difference limens indicate, we believe, the capacity of highly trained individuals of either species to ascertain small differences in the temporal order of somesthetic stimuli and of the neural events evoked by them. In one series of experiments we demonstrated that subjects of both species possess two threshold for two different aspects of flutter-vibration which are displaced from each other along the intensive continuum. For either species, the minimum level of stimulus amplitude required for threshold frequency discrimination is about 8 dB above that sufficient for detection. This difference in amplitude is called the atonal interval and matches that observed between absolute and tuning thresholds for quickly adapting, mechanoreceptor afferents (the Meissner afferents) which innervate the glabrous skin of the monkey hand. These and previous findings have permitted a number of direct correlations between behavioral and neural events as regards the sense of flutter. The neural codes for the intensity and frequency of flutter appear to be different. The capacity to detect the presence of a mechanical sinusoid and the capacity to judge its subjective intensity are likely to depend on criterion levels of activity in the total population of Meissner afferents, the former on the appearance of any activity (absolute threshold) in a small population of the most sensitive of these fibers and the latter on the overall size of the active population of neuronal elements at each level of amplitude. The total activity in the relevant neural population elicited by sinusoids of increasing amplitude defines a prothetic continuum along which subjects can judge the magnitude of sensation..
在一项二选一的强制选择任务中,测量了猴子和人类区分振幅或频率不同的机械正弦波的能力。相对于检测阈值,在17 - 30分贝的范围内,两种物种的振幅辨别阈限在标准振幅的10%左右保持恒定。相对于检测阈值,在20 - 40赫兹范围内,分别在20分贝和29分贝处确定了等主观强度曲线。这些曲线与阈值曲线相符,且两种物种的曲线相同。人类的频率辨别阈限平均为1.8赫兹,猴子为2.7赫兹;两种物种的值范围几乎完全重叠。我们认为,这些辨别阈限较小表明,两种物种中训练有素的个体有能力确定躯体感觉刺激及其引发的神经事件在时间顺序上的微小差异。在一系列实验中,我们证明两种物种的受试者对于颤振的两个不同方面都有两个阈值,这两个阈值在强度连续体上相互错开。对于任何一种物种,频率辨别阈值所需的最小刺激振幅水平比检测所需的水平高约8分贝。这种振幅差异被称为无调区间,与支配猴子手部无毛皮肤的快速适应机械感受器传入纤维(迈斯纳传入纤维)的绝对阈值和调谐阈值之间的差异相匹配。这些发现以及之前的研究结果使得在颤振感觉方面行为和神经事件之间建立了许多直接关联。颤振强度和频率的神经编码似乎不同。检测机械正弦波存在的能力以及判断其主观强度的能力可能取决于迈斯纳传入纤维总体群体中的活动标准水平,前者取决于这些纤维中一小部分最敏感纤维出现任何活动(绝对阈值),而后者取决于每个振幅水平上活跃神经元群体的总体大小。振幅增加的正弦波在相关神经群体中引发的总活动定义了一个辅助连续体,受试者可以沿着这个连续体判断感觉的大小。