Armstrong T G, Heideman G, Corcoran K J, Fisher B, Medina K L, Schafer J
Department of Psychology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Fam Community Health. 2001 Apr;24(1):55-75. doi: 10.1097/00003727-200104000-00008.
This work explored the reasons underlying inter-partner disagreement about the occurrence of intimate partner violence (IPV). Research indicates that partners often do not agree about episodes of conflict in their relationship. We conducted interviews with 48 women and men with and without histories of IPV to investigate this lack of agreement. Participant responses were analyzed and themes were identified about why men and women disagree about episodes of conflict. The main results indicate that participants think women and men remember differently; women remember more than men, both choose what they want to remember, and both remember that they were right in the conflict. This work contributes to understanding the disagreement that occurs between partners. Many of these findings have never been suggested by other IPV researchers. The broad-reaching implications of this study include improvement in the accuracy of measuring IPV.
这项研究探讨了伴侣之间对亲密伴侣暴力（IPV）发生存在分歧的潜在原因。研究表明，伴侣们在关系中的冲突事件上往往意见不一。我们对48名有或没有IPV史的男性和女性进行了访谈，以调查这种意见不一致的情况。对参与者的回答进行了分析，并确定了关于男性和女性为何在冲突事件上存在分歧的主题。主要结果表明，参与者认为男性和女性的记忆方式不同；女性比男性记得更多，双方都选择自己想记住的内容，并且双方都记得自己在冲突中是正确的。这项研究有助于理解伴侣之间出现的分歧。许多这些发现从未被其他IPV研究人员提出过。这项研究的广泛影响包括提高测量IPV的准确性。
