Department of Sociology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA.
J Interpers Violence. 2013 May;28(8):1561-78. doi: 10.1177/0886260512468325. Epub 2012 Dec 24.
Research on Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) has ignited considerable controversy about gender and IPV. Feminist scholars have viewed IPV as a manifestation of male dominance and control, with women primarily the victims and men primarily the perpetrators of this behavior (gender asymmetry). Conversely, family violence researchers have viewed IPV as emerging from conflicts in relationships, with both men and women being involved (gender symmetry). The present study was framed within the context of this controversy using new empirical evidence on one person arrested (single arrest) or both persons arrested (dual arrest) in IPV incidents. Data were acquired on the assessed risk of IPV recidivism immediately after arrest and actual IPV recidivism over an 18-month period postassessment across the state of Connecticut involving heterosexual partners (N = 2,155). Though not definitive, the findings showed persistent gender asymmetry on these behavioral characteristics across arrest categories.
亲密伴侣暴力 (IPV) 的研究引发了关于性别和 IPV 的相当大的争议。女性主义学者将 IPV 视为男性主导和控制的表现,女性主要是受害者,男性主要是这种行为的实施者(性别不对称)。相反,家庭暴力研究人员将 IPV 视为关系冲突中出现的行为,男性和女性都参与其中(性别对称)。本研究在这一争议的背景下,使用了在康涅狄格州发生的 IPV 事件中一人被捕(单一逮捕)或两人被捕(双重逮捕)的新实证证据。在涉及异性伴侣的整个康涅狄格州,对被捕后立即评估的 IPV 再犯风险和实际的 18 个月 IPV 再犯情况进行了数据采集(N=2155)。尽管不是决定性的,但这些发现表明,在这些行为特征上,逮捕类别中存在持续的性别不对称。