Roosevelt G E, Kulkarni M S, Shulman S T
Department of Pediatrics, Northwestern University Medical School, Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, The Children's Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA.
Ann Emerg Med. 2001 Apr;37(4):377-81. doi: 10.1067/mem.2001.114090.
We compare the performance of a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA)-waived antigen detection test (ADT) analyzed in the emergency department and a CLIA moderately complex ADT performed in the hospital microbiology laboratory.
Samples from throat swabs were obtained using a double-headed Culturette II (Becton Dickinson Medical Systems, Sparks, MD) from a consecutive sample of 322 patients 3 years or older who presented to the ED of a university-affiliated pediatric referral hospital with the complaint of sore throat during 1998. One swab was transported to the microbiology laboratory and analyzed using a CLIA moderately complex ADT; negative results were confirmed using sheep blood agar culture. The second swab remained in the ED where a nurse conducted a CLIA-waived ADT. The accepted standard for documentation of group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal (GABHS) infection was either a positive moderately complex ADT or culture result. The time of specimen collection, as well as the time the ED results and microbiology laboratory results were available to treating physicians, were recorded. Main outcome measures were concordance (kappa statistic), sensitivity, and turnaround time (Mann-Whitney U test).
Three hundred twenty-two patients (mean age 7.5 years) had both ADTs performed. One hundred one (31%) patients had documented GABHS in the microbiology laboratory; 83 (82%) had a positive ADT result in the microbiology laboratory, and 18 (18%) had a positive culture result after a negative moderately complex ADT result. In 299 patients or 93% (95% confidence interval [CI] 90.8%, 95.8%) of patients, the waived ADT and the moderately complex ADT results were concordant (kappa 0.82; 95% CI 0.78, 0.86; P <.001). The sensitivity of the waived ADT was 80%; the sensitivity of the moderately complex ADT approximated 82% (difference of 2%; 95%CI -3%, 7%). The median times from swab specimen collection to availability of ADT results were 10 minutes (range 3 to 37 minutes) for the waived ADT and 35 minutes (range 5 to 162 minutes) for the moderately complex ADT (P <.001) with a difference of 25 minutes (95% CI 22.4, 27.6 minutes).
In this study, an ED CLIA-waived rapid streptococcal throat test performed as well as its equivalent CLIA-regulated laboratory test. Further, the ED test provided results more rapidly than the laboratory test. Our results also validate previous work that negative rapid throat test results in pediatric patients in the ED should be confirmed by standard throat culture.
我们比较了在急诊科分析的临床实验室改进修正案(CLIA)豁免抗原检测试验(ADT)和在医院微生物实验室进行的CLIA中度复杂ADT的性能。
使用双头Culturette II(Becton Dickinson Medical Systems,Sparks,MD)从1998年因喉咙痛主诉到大学附属儿科转诊医院急诊科就诊的322例3岁及以上连续患者的样本中获取咽拭子样本。一支拭子被送往微生物实验室,使用CLIA中度复杂ADT进行分析;阴性结果用羊血琼脂培养进行确认。第二支拭子留在急诊科,由护士进行CLIA豁免ADT。A组β溶血性链球菌(GABHS)感染记录的公认标准是中度复杂ADT阳性或培养结果阳性。记录标本采集时间,以及急诊科结果和微生物实验室结果可供治疗医生使用的时间。主要结局指标是一致性(kappa统计量)、敏感性和周转时间(Mann-Whitney U检验)。
322例患者(平均年龄7.5岁)均进行了两种ADT检测。微生物实验室记录到101例(31%)患者有GABHS感染;微生物实验室83例(82%)ADT结果为阳性,18例(18%)在中度复杂ADT结果为阴性后培养结果为阳性。在299例患者(93%,95%置信区间[CI]90.8%,95.8%)中,豁免ADT和中度复杂ADT结果一致(kappa 0.82;95%CI 0.78,0.86;P<.001)。豁免ADT的敏感性为80%;中度复杂ADT的敏感性约为82%(差异为2%;95%CI -3%,7%)。从拭子标本采集到ADT结果可用的中位时间,豁免ADT为10分钟(范围3至37分钟),中度复杂ADT为35分钟(范围5至162分钟)(P<.001),相差25分钟(95%CI 22.4,27.6分钟)。
在本研究中,急诊科CLIA豁免快速链球菌咽拭子检测与其等效的CLIA监管实验室检测表现相当。此外,急诊科检测比实验室检测提供结果的速度更快。我们的结果也验证了之前的研究工作,即急诊科儿科患者快速咽拭子检测结果为阴性时,应用标准咽拭子培养进行确认。