• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用喉镜进行微创大隐静脉采集

Minimally invasive long saphenous vein harvesting using a laryngoscope.

作者信息

Stavridis G T, Bobos D, Matsouka F, Lacoumenta S, Alivizatos P A

机构信息

First Department of Cardiac Surgery and Transplantation, Department of Anaesthetics, The Onassis Cardiac Surgery Centre, Athens, Greece.

出版信息

Heart Surg Forum. 1998;1(1):37-40.

PMID:11276438
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Traditional open incisions for long saphenous vein (LSV) harvesting are common sources of post operative complications after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). To reduce pain and wound healing complications, minimally invasive harvesting techniques are being developed. We have investigated the use of a conventional laryngoscope for cost effective saphenous removal using short incisions and long subcutaneous tunnels.

METHODS

The LSV was exposed through small incisions connected by long subcutaneous tunnels. Soft tissue retraction, visualization and illumination were provided by a sterilized laryngoscope with a #3 or #4 Macintosh blade. Dissection was performed with standard instruments while branch ligation was performed with vascular clips. Thirty two patients undergoing CABG between October 1997 and January 1998 underwent minimally invasive vein harvesting assisted by a laryngoscope. Clinical outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

There were 27 males and 5 females with a mean age of 62.6 +/- 9.3 years in this study. Adequate saphenous vein was removed in 29 of 32 cases. (In three patients, the vein was so superficial that an open incision proved easier). The length of harvested conduit averaged 38.2 +/- 11.01 centimeters (21-55 centimeters). Harvesting time average 37.1 minutes (+/-10.8 minutes; range from 20 to 62 minutes). Postoperatively, There were no wound dehiscences, infections, cellulitis, or major hematomas. Pain and leg edema were considerably less than with traditional open harvest.

CONCLUSIONS

Minimally invasive vein harvesting is less traumatic to the extremity with fewer complications and superior patient satisfaction. Although commercial disposable systems are now available to permit minimally invasive harvesting of the saphenous vein, a conventional laryngoscope can be used with much reduced costs.

摘要

背景

传统的大隐静脉(LSV)采集开放切口是冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)术后并发症的常见来源。为了减少疼痛和伤口愈合并发症,正在开发微创采集技术。我们研究了使用传统喉镜通过短切口和长皮下隧道进行经济有效的大隐静脉切除术。

方法

通过由长皮下隧道连接的小切口暴露大隐静脉。使用带有#3或#4麦金托什刀片的消毒喉镜进行软组织牵开、可视化和照明。用标准器械进行解剖,用血管夹进行分支结扎。1997年10月至1998年1月期间接受CABG的32例患者在喉镜辅助下进行了微创静脉采集。评估临床结果。

结果

本研究中有27名男性和5名女性,平均年龄为62.6±9.3岁。32例患者中有29例成功采集到足够的大隐静脉。(在3例患者中,静脉非常表浅,开放切口证明更容易)。采集的管道平均长度为38.2±11.01厘米(21 - 55厘米)。采集时间平均为37.1分钟(±10.8分钟;范围为20至62分钟)。术后,没有伤口裂开、感染、蜂窝织炎或重大血肿。疼痛和腿部水肿明显少于传统开放采集。

结论

微创静脉采集对肢体的创伤较小,并发症较少,患者满意度较高。虽然现在有商业一次性系统可用于微创采集大隐静脉,但传统喉镜可以以大大降低的成本使用。

相似文献

1
Minimally invasive long saphenous vein harvesting using a laryngoscope.使用喉镜进行微创大隐静脉采集
Heart Surg Forum. 1998;1(1):37-40.
2
Minimally invasive saphenous vein harvesting using a laryngoscope: procedural, functional, and morphologic evaluation.
Heart Surg Forum. 2005;8(6):E425-30. doi: 10.1532/HSF98.20051026.
3
Operative outcomes of minimally invasive saphenous vein harvest.微创大隐静脉获取的手术结果
Am J Surg. 1998 May;175(5):391-5. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(98)00044-0.
4
Postoperative and midterm outcomes of minimally invasive and endoscopic great saphenous vein harvesting for coronary artery bypass grafting - a prospective analysis.冠状动脉旁路移植术中微创与内镜下大隐静脉采集的术后及中期结果——一项前瞻性分析
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007 Oct;55(7):428-32. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-965325.
5
A comparative analysis of saphenous vein conduit harvesting techniques for coronary artery bypass grafting--standard bridging versus the open technique.
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010 Jan;10(1):27-31. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2009.209171. Epub 2009 Aug 20.
6
Minimally invasive saphenous vein harvesting: is there an improvement of the results with the endoscopic approach?
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1999 Nov;16 Suppl 2:S58-60.
7
Less invasive radial artery harvesting: two years' experience.微创桡动脉获取:两年经验
Heart Surg Forum. 2005;8(6):E437-42. doi: 10.1532/HSF98.20051147.
8
Routine minimal invasive vein harvesting reduces postoperative morbidity in cardiac bypass procedures. Clinical report of 1400 patients.常规微创静脉采集可降低心脏搭桥手术的术后发病率。1400例患者的临床报告。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1999 Nov;16 Suppl 2:S61-6.
9
A meta-analysis of minimally invasive versus traditional open vein harvest technique for coronary artery bypass graft surgery.冠状动脉搭桥手术中微创与传统开放静脉采集技术的荟萃分析。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010 Feb;10(2):266-70. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2009.222430. Epub 2009 Nov 26.
10
Risk factors for leg wound complications following endoscopic versus traditional saphenous vein harvesting.内镜下与传统大隐静脉获取术后腿部伤口并发症的危险因素。
Heart Surg Forum. 2000;3(4):325-30.

引用本文的文献

1
Unilayer Closure of Saphenous Vein Incision Lines is Better than Bilayer Closure.大隐静脉切口线单层缝合优于双层缝合。
Open Cardiovasc Med J. 2010 Dec 10;4:293-6. doi: 10.2174/1874192401004010293.