• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内镜下与传统大隐静脉获取术后腿部伤口并发症的危险因素。

Risk factors for leg wound complications following endoscopic versus traditional saphenous vein harvesting.

作者信息

Allen K B, Heimansohn D A, Robison R J, Schier J J, Griffith G L, Fitzgerald E B, Isch J H, Abraham S, Shaar C J

机构信息

Indiana Heart Institute, St. Vincent Hospital and Health Care Center, Indianapolis, USA.

出版信息

Heart Surg Forum. 2000;3(4):325-30.

PMID:11178296
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Risk factors for leg wound complications following traditional saphenectomy have included: obesity, diabetes, female gender, anemia, age, and peripheral vascular disease. Use of an endoscopic saphenectomy technique may modify the risk factor profile associated with a traditional longitudinal incision.

METHODS

From September 1996 to May 1999, 276 consecutive patients who underwent elective isolated coronary artery bypass grafting performed by a single surgeon (K.B.A.) had their greater saphenous vein harvested endoscopically. During the period from January 1999 to May 1999, the surgical records of 643 patients who underwent the same operation and had a traditional longitudinal saphenectomy were reviewed for postoperative leg wound complications. Group demographics were similar regarding preoperative risk stratification and traditionally identified wound complication risk factors (diabetes, gender, obesity, preoperative anemia, and peripheral vascular disease). Leg wound complications were defined as: hematoma, dehiscence, cellulitis, necrosis, or abscess requiring dressing changes, antibiotics and/or debridement prior to complete epithelialization. Follow-up was 100% at six weeks.

RESULTS

Leg wound complications following endoscopic harvest occurred in 3% (9/276) of patients versus 17% (110/643) of traditional harvest patients (p < 0.0001). No univariate risk factors for wound complications were associated with endoscopic saphenectomy. Univariate predictors of wound complications following traditional saphenectomy included: diabetes (p = 0.001), obesity (p = 0.0005), and female gender (p = 0.005). Multivariable risk factors for leg wound complications following saphenectomy were traditional harvest technique (OR 7.56, CI 3.8-17.2, p < 0.0001), diabetes (OR 2.10, CI 1.4-3.2, p = 0.0006) and obesity (OR 1.82, CI 1.2-2.8, p = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

Traditional longitudinal saphenectomy is a multivariable risk factor for development of leg wound complications. Endoscopic saphenectomy modifies the risk factor profile for wound complications and should be the standard of care, particularly for obese and/or diabetic patients who require venous conduit during coronary artery bypass grafting.

摘要

背景

传统大隐静脉剥脱术后腿部伤口并发症的危险因素包括:肥胖、糖尿病、女性、贫血、年龄和外周血管疾病。使用内镜下大隐静脉剥脱技术可能会改变与传统纵向切口相关的危险因素。

方法

1996年9月至1999年5月,由同一外科医生(K.B.A.)连续进行择期单纯冠状动脉旁路移植术的276例患者接受了内镜下大隐静脉采集。在1999年1月至1999年5月期间,回顾了643例接受相同手术并进行传统纵向大隐静脉剥脱术患者的手术记录,以了解术后腿部伤口并发症情况。两组在术前风险分层和传统确定的伤口并发症危险因素(糖尿病、性别、肥胖、术前贫血和外周血管疾病)方面的人口统计学特征相似。腿部伤口并发症定义为:血肿、裂开、蜂窝织炎、坏死或脓肿,在完全上皮化之前需要更换敷料、使用抗生素和/或清创。六周时随访率为100%。

结果

内镜采集后腿部伤口并发症发生率为3%(9/276),而传统采集患者为17%(110/643)(p<0.0001)。内镜下大隐静脉剥脱术与伤口并发症的单变量危险因素无关。传统大隐静脉剥脱术后伤口并发症的单变量预测因素包括:糖尿病(p=0.001)、肥胖(p=0.0005)和女性(p=0.005)。大隐静脉剥脱术后腿部伤口并发症的多变量危险因素为传统采集技术(OR 7.56,CI 3.8 - 17.2,p<0.0001)、糖尿病(OR 2.10,CI 1.4 - 3.2,p = 0.0006)和肥胖(OR 1.82,CI 1.2 - 2.8,p = 0.007)。

结论

传统纵向大隐静脉剥脱术是腿部伤口并发症发生的多变量危险因素。内镜下大隐静脉剥脱术改变了伤口并发症的危险因素谱,应成为治疗的标准方法,特别是对于冠状动脉旁路移植术中需要静脉管道的肥胖和/或糖尿病患者。

相似文献

1
Risk factors for leg wound complications following endoscopic versus traditional saphenous vein harvesting.内镜下与传统大隐静脉获取术后腿部伤口并发症的危险因素。
Heart Surg Forum. 2000;3(4):325-30.
2
Influence of endoscopic versus traditional saphenectomy on event-free survival: five-year follow-up of a prospective randomized trial.内镜下与传统大隐静脉切除术对无事件生存期的影响:一项前瞻性随机试验的五年随访
Heart Surg Forum. 2003;6(6):E143-5.
3
Randomized trial of endoscopic versus open vein harvest for coronary artery bypass grafting: six-month patency rates.冠状动脉搭桥术中内镜下与开放静脉采集的随机试验:六个月通畅率
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005 Mar;129(3):496-503. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.08.054.
4
[Endoscopic vein-graft harvesting for coronary bypass grafting: good results in patients at risk for surgical site infection].[用于冠状动脉搭桥术的内镜下静脉移植物获取:对手术部位感染高危患者效果良好]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2010;154:A1806.
5
Impact of endoscopic versus open saphenous vein harvest techniques on outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting.内镜与开放隐静脉采集技术对冠状动脉旁路移植术后结果的影响。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 Feb;89(2):403-8. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.09.061.
6
Evaluation of less invasive method for saphenous vein harvest in patients with type II diabetes.对II型糖尿病患者采用微创方法获取大隐静脉的评估。
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2007 Jul;8(7):511-6. doi: 10.2459/01.JCM.0000278447.12236.9f.
7
Postoperative and midterm outcomes of minimally invasive and endoscopic great saphenous vein harvesting for coronary artery bypass grafting - a prospective analysis.冠状动脉旁路移植术中微创与内镜下大隐静脉采集的术后及中期结果——一项前瞻性分析
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007 Oct;55(7):428-32. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-965325.
8
A meta-analysis of minimally invasive versus traditional open vein harvest technique for coronary artery bypass graft surgery.冠状动脉搭桥手术中微创与传统开放静脉采集技术的荟萃分析。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010 Feb;10(2):266-70. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2009.222430. Epub 2009 Nov 26.
9
Operative outcomes of minimally invasive saphenous vein harvest.微创大隐静脉获取的手术结果
Am J Surg. 1998 May;175(5):391-5. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(98)00044-0.
10
Routine minimal invasive vein harvesting reduces postoperative morbidity in cardiac bypass procedures. Clinical report of 1400 patients.常规微创静脉采集可降低心脏搭桥手术的术后发病率。1400例患者的临床报告。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1999 Nov;16 Suppl 2:S61-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Endoscopic vein harvesting.内镜下静脉采集
J Thorac Dis. 2021 Mar;13(3):1899-1908. doi: 10.21037/jtd-20-1819.
2
Steroids in cardiac surgery trial: a substudy of surgical site infections.心脏手术试验中的类固醇:手术部位感染的子研究。
Can J Anaesth. 2019 Feb;66(2):182-192. doi: 10.1007/s12630-018-1253-5. Epub 2018 Dec 10.
3
Application of Endoscopic Vein Harvesting in Obese Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.内镜下静脉采集在肥胖患者冠状动脉旁路移植术中的应用。
Curr Med Sci. 2018 Aug;38(4):691-696. doi: 10.1007/s11596-018-1932-z. Epub 2018 Aug 20.
4
Early Outcomes of Endoscopic Vein Harvesting during the Initial Learning Period.初始学习阶段内镜下静脉采集的早期结果
Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Jun;48(3):174-9. doi: 10.5090/kjtcs.2015.48.3.174. Epub 2015 Jun 5.
5
Immunohistochemistry comparing endoscopic vein harvesting vs. open vein harvesting on saphenous vein endothelium.免疫组织化学比较内镜下静脉采集与开放静脉采集对大隐静脉内皮的影响。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014 Jun 17;9:101. doi: 10.1186/1749-8090-9-101.
6
Endoscopic vein harvesting is influenced by patient-related risk factors and may be of specific benefit in female patients.内镜下静脉采集受患者相关风险因素的影响,对女性患者可能具有特殊益处。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2013 Oct;17(4):603-7. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivt224. Epub 2013 Jun 30.
7
Endoscopic vein harvest of the lesser saphenous vein in the supine position: a unique approach to an old problem.仰卧位下内镜隐静脉采集小隐静脉:解决老问题的独特方法。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2013 Jan;16(1):1-4. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivs414. Epub 2012 Oct 9.
8
Endoscopic vein harvesting for coronary bypass grafting: a blessing or a trojan horse?内镜下静脉采集用于冠状动脉旁路移植术:是福还是祸?
Cardiol Res Pract. 2011 Mar 20;2011:813512. doi: 10.4061/2011/813512.
9
Impact of the learning curve for endoscopic vein harvest on conduit quality and early graft patency.内镜下静脉采集学习曲线对移植物质量和早期通畅率的影响。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2011 May;91(5):1385-91; discussion 1391-2. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.01.079.
10
Noninfectious wound complications in clean surgery: epidemiology, risk factors, and association with antibiotic use.清洁手术中的非感染性伤口并发症:流行病学、危险因素及与抗生素使用的关系。
World J Surg. 2011 May;35(5):973-80. doi: 10.1007/s00268-011-0993-y.