Suppr超能文献

不同剂量倍氯米松治疗慢性哮喘(综述)

Beclomethasone at different doses for chronic asthma (review).

作者信息

Adams N, Bestall J, Jones P

机构信息

Respiratory Medicine, Worthing and Southlands NHS Trust, Worthing, UK.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;1999(1):CD002879. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002879.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) is available in a wide range of daily doses for the treatment of long-term asthma.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the evidence for a dose response relationship for BDP in the treatment of long-term asthma.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Airways Group trial register, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (The Cochrane Library issue 1 1999) and references lists of articles. Authors and Glaxo Wellcome UK were contacted to identify eligible studies. We also hand searched the proceeding from relevant respiratory society meetings, the British Journal of Clinical Research and the European Journal of Clinical Research for studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Prospective, randomised trials comparing two or more daily doses of BDP in patients over the age of two years with long-term asthma.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Trials were selected for inclusion and scored for quality by two reviewers. Data were extracted by one reviewer. Authors were contacted to clarify details of study design and retrieve missing data.

MAIN RESULTS

11 trials involving 1614 subjects were included. Methodological quality was variable. Studies rarely gave a clear indication of the degree of asthma control at baseline. Less than two-fold to five-fold dose differences were assessed by different studies. The results are reported as weighted mean differences (WMD) with 95% confidence limits (95% CI). The number of trials (N) contributing to each outcome is stated. In non-oral steroid treated asthmatics a small advantage of BDP 800 mcg/d over 400 mcg/d was apparent for improvement in morning peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) compared to baseline, WMD 11 L/min (95% CI 4 to 19 L/min) N=2; improvement in forced expired volume in one second (FEV1) compared to baseline, WMD 9 ml (95% CI 3 to 140) N=1; and reduction in night-time symptom score compared to baseline, WMD 0.13 (95% CI 0.04 to 0.22) N=1. Studies that assessed BDP 1000 v 500 mcg/d and BDP 1600 v 400 mcg/d demonstrated significant advantage of higher dose over lower dose for histamine bronchial hyper-responsiveness (BHR) and percentage improvement in FEV1 compared to baseline. No differences between higher and lower daily doses of BDP were apparent for daytime symptoms, withdrawals due to asthma exacerbation, oropharyngeal side effects or measures of hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) function. No difference in prednisolone sparing effect was apparent when comparing high dose and low dose BDP in oral corticosteroid (OCS) dependent patients.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: BDP appears to demonstrate a shallow dose response effect in long-term asthma for a small number of efficacy outcomes over range of daily doses from 400 mcg/d to 1600 mcg/d, although the clinical significance of the improvements afforded by higher doses is questionable.

摘要

背景

丙酸倍氯米松(BDP)有多种日剂量规格可用于治疗长期哮喘。

目的

评估BDP治疗长期哮喘时剂量反应关系的证据。

检索策略

我们检索了Cochrane气道组试验注册库、Cochrane对照试验注册库(《Cochrane图书馆》1999年第1期)以及文章的参考文献列表。联系了作者和英国葛兰素威康公司以确定符合条件的研究。我们还手工检索了相关呼吸学会会议的论文集、《英国临床研究杂志》和《欧洲临床研究杂志》以查找研究。

入选标准

比较两种或更多日剂量BDP治疗两岁以上长期哮喘患者的前瞻性随机试验。

数据收集与分析

选择试验纳入研究,并由两名评价员对质量进行评分。由一名评价员提取数据。联系作者以澄清研究设计细节并获取缺失数据。

主要结果

纳入了11项涉及1614名受试者的试验。方法学质量参差不齐。研究很少能清楚表明基线时哮喘控制的程度。不同研究评估的剂量差异在不到两倍至五倍之间。结果以加权均数差(WMD)及95%置信区间(95%CI)报告。列出了对每个结局有贡献的试验数量(N)。在未接受口服类固醇治疗的哮喘患者中,与基线相比,BDP 800 mcg/d在改善早晨呼气峰值流速(PEFR)方面比400 mcg/d有小的优势,WMD为11 L/min(95%CI 4至19 L/min),N = 2;与基线相比,一秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)改善,WMD为9 ml(95%CI 3至140),N = 1;与基线相比,夜间症状评分降低,WMD为0.13(95%CI 0.04至0.22),N = 1。评估BDP 1000 μg/d与500 μg/d以及BDP 1600 μg/d与400 μg/d的研究表明,高剂量在组胺支气管高反应性(BHR)以及与基线相比FEV1改善百分比方面比低剂量有显著优势。BDP的高日剂量和低日剂量在白天症状、因哮喘加重而停药、口咽副作用或下丘脑 - 垂体 - 肾上腺(HPA)功能指标方面无明显差异。在口服皮质类固醇(OCS)依赖患者中,比较高剂量和低剂量BDP时,在泼尼松龙节省效应方面无明显差异。

评价员结论

BDP在400 mcg/d至1600 mcg/d的日剂量范围内,对于少数疗效结局在长期哮喘中似乎呈现出较浅的剂量反应效应,尽管高剂量所带来改善的临床意义值得怀疑。

相似文献

1
Beclomethasone at different doses for chronic asthma (review).不同剂量倍氯米松治疗慢性哮喘(综述)
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;1999(1):CD002879. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002879.
2
3
4
Inhaled beclomethasone versus placebo for chronic asthma.吸入性倍氯米松与安慰剂治疗慢性哮喘的对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jan 25;2005(1):CD002738. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002738.pub2.
5
Omalizumab for asthma in adults and children.奥马珠单抗用于成人和儿童哮喘治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 13;2014(1):CD003559. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003559.pub4.
8
Inhaled fluticasone propionate for chronic asthma.吸入丙酸氟替卡松治疗慢性哮喘。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001(3):CD003135. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003135.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

3

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验