Suppr超能文献

一种新型丙酸倍氯米松多剂量粉末吸入器治疗支气管哮喘

A new beclomethasone dipropionate multidose powder inhaler in the treatment of bronchial asthma.

作者信息

Nieminen M M, Vidgren P, Kokkarinen J, Laasonen K, Liippo K, Lindqvist A, Paananen M, Poukkula A, Ruotsalainen E, Salomaa E, Sovijärvi A, Söderblom T, Silvasti M, Vidgren M, Laitinen L A

机构信息

Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Tampere University Central Hospital, Tampere, Finland.

出版信息

Respiration. 1998;65(4):275-81. doi: 10.1159/000029276.

Abstract

The clinical efficacy, tolerability and acceptability of a new multidose powder inhaler (MDPI) containing beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) were compared with those of a BDP aerosol administered with a large volume spacer (MDI-spacer) among adult asthmatics currently receiving from 500 to 1,000 microgram/day of an inhaled corticosteroid. During the study, the dosage of BDP from both devices was 400 microgram twice daily. Ninety-one patients were randomized to the MDPI group and 42 to the MDI-spacer group. The trial was performed as an open, randomized, parallel group multicenter study. The duration of the treatment period was 12 weeks, and the study was preceded by a 2-week run-in period. During the run-in period, the mean morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) was 487 and 466 1/min in the MDPI and MDI-spacer groups, respectively. After the 12-week treatment, the morning PEF was 491 1/min in the MDPI group and 463 1/min in the MDI-spacer group. The evening values were 500 and 479 1/min during the run-in period and 496 and 476 1/min after the 12-week treatment, respectively. Asthma symptom scores and the use of rescue medication were low in both groups, indicating good efficacy of the preparations tested. The median dose of histamine required to decrease forced expiratory volume in 1 s by 15% increased during the study from 800 to 1,098 microgram in the MDPI group and from 795 to 960 microgram in the MDI-spacer group. The most frequent adverse events in both groups were hoarseness and sore throat. There were no statistically significant differences between the treatment groups in serum cortisol values or in the number of patients with thrush. Seventy-two percent of the patients regarded the MDPI easier to use while 95% considered it more portable. Over 80% of the patients felt that the MDPI was also easier to clean and as easy or easier to learn to use than the MDI-spacer. To conclude, the novel powder inhaler is well tolerated and at least equally effective as the conventional MDI-spacer combination in the treatment of asthma with BDP. However, in everyday use, patients clearly favored the powder inhaler.

摘要

在目前每天吸入500至1000微克皮质类固醇的成年哮喘患者中,将一种含有二丙酸倍氯米松(BDP)的新型多剂量粉末吸入器(MDPI)与使用大容量储雾罐的BDP气雾剂(MDI - 储雾罐)的临床疗效、耐受性和可接受性进行了比较。在研究期间,两种装置中BDP的剂量均为每日两次,每次400微克。91名患者被随机分配至MDPI组,42名患者被随机分配至MDI - 储雾罐组。该试验作为一项开放、随机、平行组多中心研究进行。治疗期为12周,研究前有一个2周的导入期。在导入期,MDPI组和MDI - 储雾罐组的平均早晨呼气峰流速(PEF)分别为487和466升/分钟。经过12周治疗后,MDPI组早晨PEF为491升/分钟,MDI - 储雾罐组为463升/分钟。导入期的晚上PEF值分别为500和479升/分钟,12周治疗后的晚上PEF值分别为496和476升/分钟。两组的哮喘症状评分和急救药物使用情况均较低,表明所测试制剂的疗效良好。在研究期间,使1秒用力呼气量降低15%所需组胺的中位剂量在MDPI组从800微克增加到1098微克,在MDI - 储雾罐组从795微克增加到960微克。两组最常见的不良事件是声音嘶哑和喉咙痛。治疗组之间在血清皮质醇值或患鹅口疮患者数量方面无统计学显著差异。72%的患者认为MDPI更易于使用,而95%的患者认为它更便于携带。超过80%的患者觉得MDPI也更易于清洁,并且与MDI - 储雾罐相比,学习使用起来同样容易或更易上手。总之,这种新型粉末吸入器耐受性良好,在使用BDP治疗哮喘方面至少与传统的MDI - 储雾罐组合同样有效。然而,在日常使用中,患者明显更青睐粉末吸入器。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验