Wilhelmus K R
Department of Ophthalmology, Cullen Eye Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, 6565 Fannin Street, NC-205, Suite NC-304, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001(1):CD002898. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002898.
Many clinical trials have been performed on the acute treatment of dendritic epithelial keratitis. Surveys of antiviral pharmacology and of herpes simplex virus eye disease have evaluated different commercially available agents, but a systematic review of all comparative clinical studies has not previously been undertaken.
The objective of this review is to compare the effects of various treatments for dendritic or geographic herpes simplex virus epithelial keratitis.
Sources searched for relevant studies were the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group specialized register, The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register - CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Index Medicus, Excerpta Medica Ophthalmology, reference lists of primary reports, review articles, and corneal textbooks and conference proceedings pertaining to ocular virology.
This review includes comparative clinical trials that assessed oral or topical ophthalmic antiviral agents, or physical or chemical debridement in people with active epithelial keratitis.
The reviewer extracted data and assessed trial quality. Interventions were compared by the proportions of participants healed at seven days and at fourteen days after trial enrollment.
This review includes data from 96 trials which randomised a total of 4991 participants. Compared to idoxuridine, the topical application of vidarabine, trifluridine, or acyclovir generally resulted in a significantly greater proportion of participants healing within one week of treatment. Among these three antiviral agents, no treatment emerged as significantly better for the therapy of dendritic epithelial keratitis. Insufficient placebo-controlled studies were available to assess debridement and other physical and physicochemical methods of treatment. Interferon monotherapy had a slight beneficial effect on dendritic epithelial keratitis, but not better than other antiviral agents, and was useful with debridement.
REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Currently available and investigational antiviral agents are effective and nearly equivalent, but the combination of an antiviral nucleoside and interferon seems to speed healing. Future trials of the acute treatment of herpes simplex virus epithelial keratitis must aim to achieve adequate statistical power for assessing the primary outcome and should consider the effect of lesion size and other characteristics on treatment response.
针对树枝状上皮性角膜炎的急性治疗已开展了许多临床试验。抗病毒药理学及单纯疱疹病毒性眼病的调查评估了不同的市售药物,但此前尚未对所有比较性临床研究进行系统评价。
本综述的目的是比较各种治疗方法对树枝状或地图状单纯疱疹病毒性上皮性角膜炎的疗效。
检索相关研究的来源包括Cochrane眼科与视觉组专业注册库、Cochrane对照试验注册库(CENTRAL)、医学索引数据库(MEDLINE)、荷兰医学文摘数据库(EMBASE)、医学索引、医学文摘眼科学分册、原始报告的参考文献列表、综述文章以及与眼病毒学相关的角膜教科书和会议论文集。
本综述纳入了评估口服或局部眼科抗病毒药物,或对活动性上皮性角膜炎患者进行物理或化学清创的比较性临床试验。
综述作者提取数据并评估试验质量。通过试验入组后7天和14天治愈的参与者比例比较干预措施。
本综述纳入了96项试验的数据,共随机分配了4991名参与者。与碘苷相比,局部应用阿糖腺苷、三氟胸苷或阿昔洛韦通常使治疗1周内治愈的参与者比例显著更高。在这三种抗病毒药物中,没有一种治疗方法在树枝状上皮性角膜炎的治疗上表现出明显更好的效果。由于安慰剂对照研究不足,无法评估清创及其他物理和物理化学治疗方法。干扰素单一疗法对树枝状上皮性角膜炎有轻微有益作用,但不比其他抗病毒药物更好,且与清创联合使用有效。
目前可用的和正在研究的抗病毒药物有效且近乎等效,但抗病毒核苷与干扰素联合使用似乎能加快愈合。未来单纯疱疹病毒性上皮性角膜炎急性治疗的试验必须旨在获得足够的统计效能以评估主要结局,并应考虑病变大小和其他特征对治疗反应的影响。