Re: Koshy et al.--The use of propofol versus midazolam.
作者信息
Diwakaran H H, Giacaman M H
出版信息
Am J Gastroenterol. 2001 Mar;96(3):920-1. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.03648.x.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Re: Koshy et al.--The use of propofol versus midazolam.关于：科希等人——丙泊酚与咪达唑仑的使用
Am J Gastroenterol. 2001 Mar;96(3):920-1. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.03648.x.
2
Re: Koshy et al.--propofol with fentanyl.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2000 Nov;95(11):3337-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.03334.x.
3
Propofol versus midazolam and meperidine for conscious sedation in GI endoscopy.丙泊酚与咪达唑仑及哌替啶用于胃肠内镜检查中的清醒镇静
Am J Gastroenterol. 2000 Jun;95(6):1476-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.02080.x.
4
Re: Koshy et al.--Propofol versus midazolam and meperidine for conscious sedation in GI endoscopy.回复：科希等人——丙泊酚与咪达唑仑及哌替啶用于胃肠内镜检查中的清醒镇静。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2001 Aug;96(8):2523. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.04081.x.
5
Comparison of the effect of protocol-directed sedation with propofol vs. midazolam by nurses in intensive care: efficacy, haemodynamic stability and patient satisfaction.重症监护病房护士使用丙泊酚与咪达唑仑进行方案导向镇静的效果比较：疗效、血流动力学稳定性及患者满意度
J Clin Nurs. 2008 Jun;17(11):1510-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.02128.x.
6
Propofol vs. midazolam for sedation.丙泊酚与咪达唑仑用于镇静的比较。
Crit Care Med. 1996 Jan;24(1):179. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199601000-00034.
7
From oral midazolam to propofol: a perspective.从口服咪达唑仑到丙泊酚：一种观点。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2005 Feb;61(2):201-3. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(04)02800-7.
8
Propofol versus midazolam in critically ill patients.
Crit Care Med. 1997 Mar;25(3):554-5. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199703000-00028.
9
Prolonged sedation with midazolam or propofol.咪达唑仑或丙泊酚所致的长时间镇静。
Crit Care Med. 1997 Mar;25(3):556-7. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199703000-00034.
10
A randomized controlled trial on use of propofol alone versus propofol with midazolam, ketamine, and pentazocine "sedato-analgesic cocktail" for sedation during ERCP.一项关于在ERCP期间单独使用丙泊酚与使用丙泊酚加咪达唑仑、氯胺酮和喷他佐辛“镇静镇痛合剂”进行镇静的随机对照试验。
Endoscopy. 2007 Sep;39(9):807-12. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-966725.
Zotero 插件