• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Comparative clinical trial of progressive dilatational and forceps dilatational tracheostomy.

作者信息

Van Heurn L W, Mastboom W B, Scheeren C I, Brink P R, Ramsay G

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University Hospital, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Intensive Care Med. 2001 Jan;27(1):292-5. doi: 10.1007/s001340000743.

DOI:10.1007/s001340000743
PMID:11280651
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the safety and early complications of progressive dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) and forceps dilatational tracheostomy (FDT).

DESIGN

Prospective randomized trial.

SETTING

Three-centre university and public teaching hospitals.

PATIENTS

One hundred and twenty-seven consecutive patients were randomized to undergo PDT or FDT.

RESULTS

The duration of the procedure was 7.0 +/- 3.5 min in the PDT group and 6.4 +/- 4.9 min in the FDT group, which was not significantly different. Intraprocedural complications occurred in 14 % with PDT and 31% with FDT (p = 0.03), and were usually minor. Difficult or false insertion of the cannula in eight patients after FDTwas the most common complication.

CONCLUSIONS

Both percutaneous tracheostomy techniques are safe. The early complication rate of PDT appeared to be lower than FDT, but the early complication rate of FDT may be decreased significantly with small modifications to the set.

摘要

相似文献

1
Comparative clinical trial of progressive dilatational and forceps dilatational tracheostomy.
Intensive Care Med. 2001 Jan;27(1):292-5. doi: 10.1007/s001340000743.
2
Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy versus conventional surgical tracheostomy. A clinical randomised study.经皮扩张气管切开术与传统外科气管切开术:一项临床随机研究
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1998 May;42(5):545-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1998.tb05164.x.
3
Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy in the ICU: optimal organization, low complication rates, and description of a new complication.重症监护病房中的经皮扩张气管切开术:优化组织、低并发症发生率及一种新并发症的描述
Chest. 2003 May;123(5):1595-602. doi: 10.1378/chest.123.5.1595.
4
Surgical tracheostomy versus percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy. A prospective-randomized study with long-term follow-up.手术气管切开术与经皮扩张气管切开术。一项长期随访的前瞻性随机研究。
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2002 Feb;43(1):113-21.
5
PercuTwist: a new alternative to Griggs and Ciaglia's techniques.PercuTwist:格里格斯和恰利亚技术的一种新替代方法。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2007 Jun;24(6):492-7. doi: 10.1017/S0265021506002274. Epub 2007 Jan 8.
6
[The cost-efficiency and safety of bedside forceps dilatational tracheostomy in the intensive care unit].[重症监护病房床旁钳扩法气管切开术的成本效益与安全性]
Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2010 Sep;22(9):537-9.
7
Percutaneous tracheostomy: ciaglia blue rhino versus the basic ciaglia technique of percutaneous dilational tracheostomy.经皮气管切开术:Ciaglia Blue Rhino与经皮扩张气管切开术的基本Ciaglia技术对比
Anesth Analg. 2000 Oct;91(4):882-6. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200010000-00021.
8
Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheostomy via Griggs Technique.经皮扩张气管切开术(Griggs 技术)。
Arch Iran Med. 2017 Jan;20(1):49-54.
9
Percutaneous tracheostomy: a clinical comparison of dilatational (Ciaglia) and translaryngeal (Fantoni) techniques.经皮气管切开术:扩张法(Ciaglia法)与经喉法(Fantoni法)的临床比较
Anesth Analg. 1999 Oct;89(4):938-43. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199910000-00022.
10
Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy versus open tracheostomy--a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.经皮扩张气管切开术与开放性气管切开术——一项前瞻性、随机对照试验。
J Chin Med Assoc. 2003 Aug;66(8):467-73.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimal methodology for percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy: a comparative analysis between conventional and multidisciplinary approaches utilizing ultrasound, flexible bronchoscopy, and microcatheter puncture in critically ill individuals of diminutive stature-a longitudinal single-institutional experience and retrospective analysis.经皮扩张气管切开术的最佳方法:在身材矮小的重症患者中,传统方法与多学科方法(利用超声、可弯曲支气管镜和微导管穿刺)的比较分析——一项单机构纵向经验及回顾性分析
J Thorac Dis. 2024 Jun 30;16(6):3668-3684. doi: 10.21037/jtd-24-172. Epub 2024 May 27.
2
Tracheostomy in Adult Intensive Care Unit: An ISCCM Expert Panel Practice Recommendations.成人重症监护病房中的气管切开术:国际重症监护医学学会专家小组实践建议
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2020 Jan;24(Suppl 1):S31-S42. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-G23184.
3
Percutaneous tracheostomy.经皮气管切开术
Ann Card Anaesth. 2017 Jan;20(Supplement):S19-S25. doi: 10.4103/0971-9784.197793.
4
Elective Tracheotomy Practices in Turkey.土耳其的择期气管切开术实践
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 15;11(11):e0166097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166097. eCollection 2016.
5
Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomies in a newly established trauma center: a report from Qatar.卡塔尔一家新建创伤中心的经皮扩张气管切开术报告
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2013 Oct;39(5):507-10. doi: 10.1007/s00068-013-0299-x. Epub 2013 Jun 8.
6
Percutaneous and surgical tracheostomy in critically ill adult patients: a meta-analysis.危重症成年患者的经皮与外科气管切开术:一项荟萃分析
Crit Care. 2014 Dec 19;18(6):544. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0544-7.
7
Evolution of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy--a review of current techniques and their pitfalls.经皮扩张气管切开术的演变——对当前技术及其缺陷的综述。
World J Surg. 2013 Jul;37(7):1633-46. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2025-6.
8
Clinical review: percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy.临床综述:经皮扩张气管切开术
Crit Care. 2006 Feb;10(1):202. doi: 10.1186/cc3900.
9
Comparison of two percutaneous tracheostomy techniques, guide wire dilating forceps and Ciaglia Blue Rhino: a sequential cohort study.两种经皮气管切开术技术(导丝扩张钳法和Ciaglia Blue Rhino法)的比较:一项序贯队列研究
Crit Care. 2004 Oct;8(5):R299-305. doi: 10.1186/cc2907. Epub 2004 Jul 5.
10
Videobronchoscopic guidance makes percutaneous dilational tracheostomy safer.视频支气管镜引导使经皮扩张气管切开术更安全。
Surg Endosc. 2004 May;18(5):839-42. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-9082-0.