LD MacLean Surgical Research Laboratories, Department of Surgery, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University, 1650 Cedar Avenue, L9-112, Montreal, QC, H3G 1A4, Canada.
World J Surg. 2013 Jul;37(7):1633-46. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2025-6.
Tracheostomy is the most commonly performed surgical procedure in critically ill patients with acute respiratory failure. While few absolute indications exist, this procedure is widely used in patients with upper respiratory obstruction and those requiring long-term mechanical ventilation. The traditional approach to tracheostomy has been an open procedure performed in the operating room. This method is associated with an increased rate of complications and costs. Accordingly, percutaneous bedside tracheostomy procedures have largely replaced the traditional operative approach at many institutions. Numerous methods for percutaneous tracheostomy have thus emerged. However, the benefits of one technique versus another have not been well demonstrated. In this article, we review the evidence supporting the use of percutaneous tracheostomy procedures over the traditional operative approach. Furthermore, we review the currently available and emerging methods by which percutaneous tracheostomy can be performed. In addition, we highlight the available evidence concerning the safety and complication rates of each technique.
气管切开术是治疗急性呼吸衰竭危重症患者最常施行的手术。虽然存在少数绝对适应证,但该手术广泛应用于上呼吸道梗阻和需要长期机械通气的患者。传统的气管切开术是在手术室进行的开放性手术。该方法与并发症发生率和成本增加相关。因此,在许多机构中,经皮床旁气管切开术已在很大程度上取代了传统的手术方法。由此出现了许多经皮气管切开术方法。然而,一种技术与另一种技术的优势尚未得到很好的证明。在本文中,我们回顾了支持经皮气管切开术优于传统手术方法的证据。此外,我们还回顾了目前可用于经皮气管切开术的现有和新兴方法。另外,我们还重点介绍了关于每种技术的安全性和并发症发生率的现有证据。