Suppr超能文献

碎冰与持续流动冷疗法的比较。

A comparison of crushed ice and continuous flow cold therapy.

作者信息

Barber F A

机构信息

Plano Orthopedic and Sports Medicine Center, Tex 75093, USA.

出版信息

Am J Knee Surg. 2000 Spring;13(2):97-101; discussion 102.

Abstract

Crushed ice was compared to continuous flow cold therapy for control of postoperative pain after arthroscopic patellar tendon autograft anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. With all other variables held constant, cold was administered by either continuous flow (group 1) or crushed ice (group 2). The cold therapy was constant for 3 days, then as needed in days 4 through 7. Data were collected by investigator evaluations and patient diaries. Pain was assessed by visual analog scale (VAS) and categorical pain scale (Likert). Eighty-seven patients were included (52 continuous flow and 35 crushed ice). Continuous passive motion averaged 54 hours for group 1 and 43 hours for group 2 (P<.05). Knee motion at one week averaged more (5 degrees/88 degrees) for group 1 (flexion range: 48 degrees-155 degrees) than for group 2 (6 degrees/77 degrees) (flexion range: 25 degrees-125 degrees) (P=.03). Likert pain scores for group 2 patients were always statistically greater than group 1 patients from the first hour through postoperative day 6 (P<.01). The average VAS pain was always greater for group 2 and statistically greater for postoperative day 1 (P<.01). Hydrocodone bitartrate with acetaminophen use in group 2 was greater than in group 1 for postoperative days 1 (P<.001) and 2 (P=.035). The respective cold modality VAS measured performance was 9.1 for group 1 and 7.8 for group 2 (P<.01). During postoperative days 4 through 6, group 1 patients applied their cold modality for 47.9 hours but group 2 patients applied their cold modality for 29.5 hours (P<.01). Compared to crushed ice, continuous flow cold therapy lowered VAS and Likert pain scores more, reduced hydrocodone bitartrate with acetaminophen use, was used more often, increased continuous passive motion, increased 1-week knee flexion, and was given significantly higher performance ratings by patients. Continuous flow cold is superior to crushed ice for outpatient ACL reconstruction pain and should not be considered an equivalent modality.

摘要

将碎冰与持续流动冷疗用于关节镜下自体髌腱前交叉韧带(ACL)重建术后疼痛控制的比较。在所有其他变量保持不变的情况下,通过持续流动(第1组)或碎冰(第2组)进行冷疗。冷疗持续3天,然后在第4至7天按需进行。数据通过研究者评估和患者日记收集。疼痛通过视觉模拟量表(VAS)和分类疼痛量表(李克特量表)进行评估。纳入87例患者(52例持续流动组和35例碎冰组)。第1组连续被动运动平均为54小时,第2组为43小时(P<0.05)。第1组在1周时的膝关节活动度平均更大(5度/88度)(屈曲范围:48度 - 155度),高于第2组(6度/77度)(屈曲范围:25度 - 125度)(P = 0.03)。从术后第1小时到第6天,第2组患者的李克特疼痛评分在统计学上始终高于第1组患者(P<0.01)。第2组的平均VAS疼痛评分始终更高,且在术后第1天在统计学上更高(P<0.01)。术后第1天(P<0.001)和第2天(P = 0.035),第2组使用含对乙酰氨基酚的氢可酮比第1组更多。第1组和第2组各自冷疗方式的VAS测量表现分别为9.1和7.8(P<0.01)。在术后第4至6天,第1组患者使用冷疗方式47.9小时,而第2组患者使用冷疗方式29.5小时(P<0.01)。与碎冰相比,持续流动冷疗能更大程度降低VAS和李克特疼痛评分,减少含对乙酰氨基酚的氢可酮使用,使用频率更高,增加连续被动运动,增加1周时的膝关节屈曲度,且患者给予的性能评分显著更高。对于门诊ACL重建术后疼痛,持续流动冷疗优于碎冰,不应被视为等效方式。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验