• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

西酞普兰在单相复发性抑郁症中的预防作用:维持治疗的安慰剂对照研究。

Prophylactic effect of citalopram in unipolar, recurrent depression: placebo-controlled study of maintenance therapy.

作者信息

Hochstrasser B, Isaksen P M, Koponen H, Lauritzen L, Mahnert F A, Rouillon F, Wade A G, Andersen M, Pedersen S F, Swart J C, Nil R

机构信息

Privatklinik, CH-3860 Meiringen, Switzerland.

出版信息

Br J Psychiatry. 2001 Apr;178:304-10. doi: 10.1192/bjp.178.4.304.

DOI:10.1192/bjp.178.4.304
PMID:11282808
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Major depression is highly recurrent. Antidepressant maintenance treatment has proven efficacy against recurrent depression.

AIMS

Comparison of prophylactic efficacy of citalopram versus placebo in unipolar, recurrent depression.

METHODS

Patients 18-65 years of age with recurrent unipolar major depression (DSM-IV), a Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale score of > or =22 and two or more previous depressive episodes, one within the past 5 years, were treated openly with citalopram (20-60 mg) for 6-9 weeks and, if responding, continued for 16 weeks before being randomised to double-blind maintenance treatment with citalopram or placebo for 48-77 weeks.

RESULTS

A total of 427 patients entered acute treatment and 269 were randomised to double-blind treatment. Time to recurrence was longer in patients taking citalopram than in patients taking placebo (P:<0.001). Prophylactic treatment was well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Citalopram (20, 40 and 60 mg) is effective in the prevention of depressive recurrences. Patients at risk should continue maintenance treatment at the dose necessary to resolve symptoms in the acute treatment phase.

摘要

背景

重度抑郁症极易复发。抗抑郁维持治疗已被证明对复发性抑郁症有效。

目的

比较西酞普兰与安慰剂在单相复发性抑郁症中的预防效果。

方法

年龄在18至65岁之间、患有复发性单相重度抑郁症(DSM-IV)、蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表评分≥22分且有两次或更多次既往抑郁发作(其中一次在过去5年内)的患者,先接受西酞普兰(20 - 60毫克)开放治疗6至9周,若有反应则继续治疗16周,之后随机接受西酞普兰或安慰剂双盲维持治疗48至77周。

结果

共有427名患者进入急性治疗阶段,269名患者被随机分配至双盲治疗组。服用西酞普兰的患者复发时间比服用安慰剂的患者更长(P < 0.001)。预防性治疗耐受性良好。

结论

西酞普兰(20毫克、40毫克和60毫克)在预防抑郁复发方面有效。有风险的患者应在急性治疗阶段使用能缓解症状的剂量继续进行维持治疗。

相似文献

1
Prophylactic effect of citalopram in unipolar, recurrent depression: placebo-controlled study of maintenance therapy.西酞普兰在单相复发性抑郁症中的预防作用:维持治疗的安慰剂对照研究。
Br J Psychiatry. 2001 Apr;178:304-10. doi: 10.1192/bjp.178.4.304.
2
Efficacy of citalopram in the prevention of recurrent depression in elderly patients: placebo-controlled study of maintenance therapy.西酞普兰预防老年患者复发性抑郁症的疗效:维持治疗的安慰剂对照研究。
Br J Psychiatry. 2002 Jul;181:29-35. doi: 10.1192/bjp.181.1.29.
3
The validity of the depression rating scales in discriminating between citalopram and placebo in depression recurrence in the maintenance therapy of elderly unipolar patients with major depression.在老年单相重度抑郁症患者维持治疗中,抑郁评定量表在区分西酞普兰与安慰剂预防抑郁复发方面的有效性。
Pharmacopsychiatry. 2003 Nov;36(6):313-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-45120.
4
Two-year maintenance treatment with citalopram, 20 mg, in unipolar subjects with high recurrence rate.对复发率高的单相情感障碍患者使用20毫克西酞普兰进行为期两年的维持治疗。
J Clin Psychiatry. 1999 Dec;60(12):861-5. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v60n1210.
5
Escitalopram (10-20 mg/day) is effective and well tolerated in a placebo-controlled study in depression in primary care.在一项针对初级保健中抑郁症患者的安慰剂对照研究中,艾司西酞普兰(每日10 - 20毫克)疗效显著且耐受性良好。
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2003 Jul;18(4):211-7. doi: 10.1097/00004850-200307000-00003.
6
Escitalopram maintenance treatment for prevention of recurrent depression: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.艾司西酞普兰维持治疗预防复发性抑郁症:一项随机、安慰剂对照试验。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2006 Nov;67(11):1767-75. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v67n1115.
7
Venlafaxine extended release versus citalopram in patients with depression unresponsive to a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor.对于对选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂无反应的抑郁症患者,文拉法辛缓释剂与西酞普兰的对比研究
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2008 May;23(3):113-9. doi: 10.1097/YIC.0b013e3282f424c2.
8
Acute antidepressive efficacy of lithium monotherapy, not citalopram, depends on recurrent course of depression.锂单药治疗的急性抗抑郁疗效,而不是西酞普兰,取决于抑郁的反复发作。
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2013 Feb;33(1):38-44. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0b013e31827b9495.
9
Patients with severe depression may benefit from buspirone augmentation of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: results from a placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind, placebo wash-in study.重度抑郁症患者可能从用丁螺环酮增强选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂治疗中获益:一项安慰剂对照、随机、双盲、安慰剂导入研究的结果
J Clin Psychiatry. 2001 Jun;62(6):448-52. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v62n0608.
10
Is selectivity for serotonin uptake associated with a reduced emergence of manic episodes in depressed patients?5-羟色胺摄取的选择性是否与抑郁症患者躁狂发作次数减少相关?
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2000 Jan;15(1):53-6. doi: 10.1097/00004850-200015010-00009.

引用本文的文献

1
Appropriate duration of antidepressant medications for prevention of depressive relapse and the impact of life stage.用于预防抑郁复发的抗抑郁药物的适当疗程及生命阶段的影响。
Mol Psychiatry. 2023 Dec;28(12):4937-4938. doi: 10.1038/s41380-023-02023-0. Epub 2023 Mar 7.
2
Antidepressants for the treatment of adults with major depressive disorder in the maintenance phase: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.抗抑郁药治疗成人重性抑郁障碍维持期:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Mol Psychiatry. 2023 Jan;28(1):402-409. doi: 10.1038/s41380-022-01824-z. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
3
Approaches for discontinuation versus continuation of long-term antidepressant use for depressive and anxiety disorders in adults.
成人抑郁和焦虑障碍中长效抗抑郁药停药与继续使用的方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 15;4(4):CD013495. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013495.pub2.
4
Discontinuation of antidepressants after remission with antidepressant medication in major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.抗抑郁药治疗缓解后停药治疗重性抑郁障碍:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Mol Psychiatry. 2021 Jan;26(1):118-133. doi: 10.1038/s41380-020-0843-0. Epub 2020 Jul 23.
5
Predicting relapse after antidepressant withdrawal - a systematic review.预测抗抑郁药撤药后的复发——一项系统评价。
Psychol Med. 2017 Feb;47(3):426-437. doi: 10.1017/S0033291716002580. Epub 2016 Oct 27.
6
Prevention of Relapse and Recurrence in Adults with Major Depressive Disorder: Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of Controlled Trials.成人重度抑郁症复发的预防:对照试验的系统评价与荟萃分析
Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2015 Jul 7;19(2):pyv076. doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyv076.
7
Sexual dysfunction associated with second-generation antidepressants in patients with major depressive disorder: results from a systematic review with network meta-analysis.与第二代抗抑郁药相关的与重度抑郁症患者的性功能障碍:来自系统评价和网络荟萃分析的结果。
Drug Saf. 2014 Jan;37(1):19-31. doi: 10.1007/s40264-013-0129-4.
8
Antidepressants and unresponsive episodes in the elderly.老年人中的抗抑郁药与无反应发作
BMJ Case Rep. 2012 Jul 17;2012:bcr0320126033. doi: 10.1136/bcr-03-2012-6033.
9
Citalopram versus other anti-depressive agents for depression.西酞普兰与其他抗抑郁药治疗抑郁症的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jul 11;2012(7):CD006534. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006534.pub2.
10
Recovery and subsequent recurrence in patients with recurrent major depressive disorder.复发性重度抑郁症患者的康复及随后的复发。
J Psychiatr Res. 2012 Jun;46(6):708-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2012.03.002. Epub 2012 Apr 2.