Department of Psychiatry, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan.
Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, School of Applied Sciences, University of Mississippi, University, Oxford, MS, 38677, USA.
Mol Psychiatry. 2023 Jan;28(1):402-409. doi: 10.1038/s41380-022-01824-z. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
A systematic review and random-effects model network meta-analysis were conducted to compare the efficacy, acceptability, tolerability, and safety of antidepressants to treat adults with major depressive disorder (MDD) in the maintenance phase. This study searched the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases and included only double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials with an enrichment design: patients were stabilized on the antidepressant of interest during the open-label study and then randomized to receive the same antidepressant or placebo. The outcomes were the 6-month relapse rate (primary outcome, efficacy), all-cause discontinuation (acceptability), discontinuation due to adverse events (tolerability), and the incidence of individual adverse events. The risk ratio with a 95% credible interval was calculated. The meta-analysis comprised 34 studies (n = 9384, mean age = 43.80 years, and %females = 68.10%) on 20 antidepressants (agomelatine, amitriptyline, bupropion, citalopram, desvenlafaxine, duloxetine, escitalopram, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, levomilnacipran, milnacipran, mirtazapine, nefazodone, paroxetine, reboxetine, sertraline, tianeptine, venlafaxine, vilazodone, and vortioxetine) and a placebo. In terms of the 6-month relapse rate, amitriptyline, citalopram, desvenlafaxine, duloxetine, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, mirtazapine, nefazodone, paroxetine, reboxetine, sertraline, tianeptine, venlafaxine, and vortioxetine outperformed placebo. Compared to placebo, desvenlafaxine, paroxetine, sertraline, venlafaxine, and vortioxetine had lower all-cause discontinuation; however, sertraline had a higher discontinuation rate due to adverse events. Compared to placebo, venlafaxine was associated with a lower incidence of dizziness, while desvenlafaxine, sertraline, and vortioxetine were associated with a higher incidence of nausea/vomiting. In conclusion, desvenlafaxine, paroxetine, venlafaxine, and vortioxetine had reasonable efficacy, acceptability, and tolerability in the treatment of adults with stable MDD.
本研究采用系统评价和随机效应模型网络荟萃分析,比较了在维持期治疗成人重度抑郁症(MDD)中,抗抑郁药的疗效、可接受性、耐受性和安全性。该研究检索了 PubMed、Cochrane 图书馆和 Embase 数据库,仅纳入了双盲、随机、安慰剂对照的富集设计试验:患者在开放性研究中稳定使用目标抗抑郁药,然后随机接受相同的抗抑郁药或安慰剂。主要结局是 6 个月时的复发率(疗效),次要结局是全因停药(可接受性)、因不良事件停药(耐受性)以及个别不良事件的发生率。采用风险比和 95%可信区间进行计算。该荟萃分析纳入了 34 项研究(n=9384,平均年龄 43.80 岁,女性占比 68.10%),涉及 20 种抗抑郁药(阿戈美拉汀、阿米替林、安非他酮、西酞普兰、地昔帕明、度洛西汀、艾司西酞普兰、氟西汀、氟伏沙明、左米那普仑、米那普仑、米氮平、奈法唑酮、帕罗西汀、瑞波西汀、舍曲林、噻奈普汀、文拉法辛、维拉唑酮和沃替西汀)和安慰剂。在 6 个月的复发率方面,阿米替林、西酞普兰、地昔帕明、度洛西汀、氟西汀、氟伏沙明、米氮平、奈法唑酮、帕罗西汀、瑞波西汀、舍曲林、噻奈普汀、文拉法辛和沃替西汀优于安慰剂。与安慰剂相比,地昔帕明、帕罗西汀、舍曲林、文拉法辛和沃替西汀的全因停药率更低,而舍曲林因不良反应停药率更高。与安慰剂相比,文拉法辛与头晕发生率降低相关,而地昔帕明、舍曲林和沃替西汀与恶心/呕吐发生率升高相关。总之,地昔帕明、帕罗西汀、文拉法辛和沃替西汀在治疗稳定的 MDD 成人患者中具有合理的疗效、可接受性和耐受性。