Feusner J H, Behrens J A, Detter J C, Cullen T C
Am J Clin Pathol. 1979 Sep;72(3):410-4. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/72.3.410.
Samples of venous and capillary blood were collected simultaneously from healthy adults to assess the accuracy of platelet counts in capillary blood as determined by an automated particle counter. The difference between the mean venous blood platelet count (248,300) and the mean capillary blood count (215,500) was highly significant (P less than .001). For 24% (7/29) of the subjects, the capillary blood platelet count underestimated the venous blood count by greater than or equal to 25%, with three subjects erroneously classified as thrombocytopenic. A heterogeneous group of thrombocytopenic patients showed a similar difference in mean platelet counts (venous blood: 72,500/microliter; capillary blood: 65,400/microliter; P = 0.01). In most clinical situations, capillary blood platelet counts were adequate for patient evaluation; however, when an accurate platelet count is necessary, venous blood should be used.
从健康成年人中同时采集静脉血和毛细血管血样本,以评估自动颗粒计数器测定的毛细血管血中血小板计数的准确性。静脉血血小板平均计数(248,300)与毛细血管血平均计数(215,500)之间的差异非常显著(P小于0.001)。对于24%(7/29)的受试者,毛细血管血血小板计数低估静脉血计数大于或等于25%,有三名受试者被错误分类为血小板减少症。一组异质性血小板减少症患者的平均血小板计数也有类似差异(静脉血:72,500/微升;毛细血管血:65,400/微升;P = 0.01)。在大多数临床情况下,毛细血管血血小板计数足以用于患者评估;然而,当需要准确的血小板计数时,应使用静脉血。