Swift M B, Cole D C, Beaton D E, Manno M
Institute for Work & Health, 250 Bloor St East, Suite 702, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M4W 1E6.
J Occup Environ Med. 2001 Mar;43(3):265-75. doi: 10.1097/00043764-200103000-00016.
Data on the use of various therapeutic interventions among working populations at risk for musculoskeletal disorders are rare, despite the need for such information in assessing adherence to best practices. Using the results of a cross-sectional survey of newspaper workers who reported neck and upper limb pain or discomfort (n = 309), we describe the prevalence of a wide range of clinical and workplace interventions. Information/education, exercises, and physical treatments were the most common interventions, and work changes were less prevalent. Those with more frequent, longer-duration, and/or more severe symptoms more commonly reported visits to physiotherapists and health practitioners at work and use of physical treatments, medications, and devices. The multiplicity of interventions used pose evaluation challenges for occupational health practitioners and researchers.
尽管在评估对最佳实践的依从性时需要此类信息,但关于肌肉骨骼疾病风险工作人群中各种治疗干预措施使用情况的数据却很少。利用对报告有颈部和上肢疼痛或不适的报业工人进行的横断面调查结果(n = 309),我们描述了广泛的临床和工作场所干预措施的患病率。信息/教育、锻炼和物理治疗是最常见的干预措施,而工作调整则不太普遍。症状更频繁、持续时间更长和/或更严重的人更常报告在工作中拜访物理治疗师和健康从业者,并使用物理治疗、药物和设备。所使用的干预措施的多样性给职业健康从业者和研究人员带来了评估挑战。