Cole Donald C, Manno Michael, Beaton Dorcas, Swift Michael
Institute for Work and Health, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
J Occup Rehabil. 2002 Sep;12(3):163-74. doi: 10.1023/a:1016842611591.
Active surveillance of symptoms and disability due to musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) in working populations can map individual transitions in symptom intensity or disability level. Using repeat surveys, this study examined if aetiological risk factors for new symptoms or disability, measured by interference with activities, were similar to prognostic risk factors for subsequent outcomes of symptoms and disability. This paper reports on 379 Toronto newspaper workers who completed questionnaires in 1996 and 1997. Questions on pain/discomfort during the last year, episode frequency and duration formed the basis for constructing three mutually exclusive symptom levels: noncases (Level 1); mild cases (Level 2); and more severe or frequent pain cases (Level 3). A similar construction of overall interference levels was based on the frequency with which musculoskeletal pain/discomfort interfered with daily, recreational, social and family activities, or ability to do one's job during the previous 12 months. The last was also examined as work interference alone. Levels of symptoms were cross-tabulated by overall and work interference at the two time points and Markov models of transitions between states were formulated. Results indicate that period prevalence of symptoms and overall interference increased between phases, though only significantly for symptoms (Levels 2 and 3, 65.7-70.7%, p = 0.04), while work interference was unchanged (17.9-17.0%). Equivalent proportions of workers improved as worsened in symptoms (21.1 and 22.4%, respectively), overall interference (16.7 and 17.8%), and work interference (7.4 and 6.6%). The only significant predictor for those without work interference at time one was job tenure, which was protective against work interference (Odds Ratio (OR) 1.06, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.01-1.12). Among those who had more severe/frequent symptoms at time one, lack of improvement over time was predicted by longer job tenure (OR = 0.92 per year, CI: 0.87-0.97), greater psychological demands of work (OR = 0.65 per point, CI: 0.51-0.84) and marginally by greater upper extremity disability score. At time one, women with work interference were more likely to have persistent interference at time two (OR = 7.22, CI: 1.57-33.20). Suggestive findings included opposite effects of social support at work: reduced risk of development of new symptoms but increased risk of persistence at the highest symptom level.
对工作人群中肌肉骨骼疾病(MSD)所致症状和残疾进行主动监测,可描绘出症状强度或残疾水平的个体转变情况。本研究通过重复调查,检验了以活动干扰来衡量的新症状或残疾的病因危险因素,是否与症状和残疾后续结局的预后危险因素相似。本文报告了379名多伦多报业工人的情况,他们于1996年和1997年完成了问卷调查。关于过去一年中的疼痛/不适、发作频率和持续时间的问题,构成了构建三个相互排斥的症状水平的基础:无病例(1级);轻度病例(2级);以及更严重或频繁疼痛病例(3级)。基于肌肉骨骼疼痛/不适在过去12个月中干扰日常、娱乐、社交和家庭活动或工作能力的频率,构建了类似的总体干扰水平。最后一项也单独作为工作干扰进行了考察。在两个时间点,将症状水平与总体干扰和工作干扰进行交叉制表,并制定了状态之间转变的马尔可夫模型。结果表明,各阶段之间症状和总体干扰的期间患病率有所增加,不过仅症状方面显著增加(2级和3级,从65.7%至70.7%,p = 0.04),而工作干扰没有变化(从17.9%至17.0%)。症状改善和恶化的工人比例相当(分别为21.1%和22.4%),总体干扰方面(分别为16.7%和17.8%),工作干扰方面(分别为7.4%和6.6%)。对于在第一个时间点没有工作干扰的人,唯一显著的预测因素是工作任期,它对工作干扰具有保护作用(优势比(OR)为1.06,95%置信区间(CI)为1.01 - 1.12)。在第一个时间点有更严重/频繁症状的人中,工作任期较长(每年OR = 0.92,CI:0.87 - 0.97)、工作心理需求较大(每增加一分OR = 0.65,CI:0.51 - 0.84)以及上肢残疾评分略高,预示着随时间推移症状改善不足。在第一个时间点有工作干扰情况的女性,在第二个时间点更有可能持续存在干扰(OR = 7.22,CI:1.57 - 33.20)。提示性发现包括工作中社会支持的相反作用:降低新症状出现的风险,但在最高症状水平上持续存在的风险增加。