Cooper K J, Earl L K, Harbell J, Raabe H
Safety and Environment Assurance Centre, Toxicology Unit, Unilever Research, Colworth House, Sharnbrook, MK44 1LQ, Bedfordshire, UK.
Toxicol In Vitro. 2001 Apr;15(2):95-103. doi: 10.1016/s0887-2333(00)00060-6.
The isolated rabbit eye (IRE) test and bovine corneal opacity and permeability (BCOP) assay were evaluated for their ability to predict the eye irritation potential of a range of hair shampoo formulations, some containing a novel non-surfactant ingredient known to be an ocular irritant. The additional endpoints of corneal swelling and histological examination were incorporated into the standard BCOP protocol. Historic Draize data were available for several of the formulations and served as a reference. The standard BCOP assay (without histology) failed to distinguish between shampoos of low and high irritant potential, when exposure times of 10 and 60 min were employed (for undiluted and 10% dilution of the shampoos, respectively) and the in vitro score classified the majority of formulations as mild. The incorporation of the histological endpoint to the BCOP protocol allowed discrimination between formulations of differing irritancy, and should be included to augment the standard BCOP protocol. Corneal swelling values did not, however, correlate with the irritant potential of the shampoos tested. The IRE which includes the endpoints of corneal swelling and histopathological scoring produced classifications of irritancy that were fairly consistent with in vivo data and distinguished between the high and low irritant potential shampoos.
对离体兔眼(IRE)试验和牛角膜混浊与通透性(BCOP)试验进行了评估,以确定它们预测一系列洗发剂配方眼刺激潜力的能力,其中一些配方含有一种已知为眼刺激物的新型非表面活性剂成分。角膜肿胀和组织学检查等额外终点被纳入标准BCOP方案。部分配方有既往的Draize试验数据可供参考。当分别采用10分钟和60分钟的暴露时间(分别针对未稀释和10%稀释的洗发剂)时,标准BCOP试验(无组织学检查)无法区分低刺激潜力和高刺激潜力的洗发剂,且体外评分将大多数配方归类为轻度刺激。将组织学终点纳入BCOP方案能够区分不同刺激性的配方,应将其纳入以完善标准BCOP方案。然而,角膜肿胀值与所测试洗发剂的刺激潜力并无关联。包含角膜肿胀和组织病理学评分终点的IRE试验得出的刺激分类与体内数据相当一致,且能区分高刺激潜力和低刺激潜力的洗发剂。