• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

EpiOcular(TM)眼刺激性试验的内部验证及其与牛角膜混浊和通透性试验相结合评估眼部刺激性。

In-house validation of the EpiOcular(TM) eye irritation test and its combination with the bovine corneal opacity and permeability test for the assessment of ocular irritation.

机构信息

BASF SE, Experimental Toxicology and Ecology, Ludwigshafen, Germany.

出版信息

Altern Lab Anim. 2011 Sep;39(4):365-87. doi: 10.1177/026119291103900410.

DOI:10.1177/026119291103900410
PMID:21942548
Abstract

In 2009, the Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability (BCOP) test was accepted by the regulatory bodies for the identification of corrosive and severe ocular irritants (Global Harmonised System [GHS] Category 1). However, no in vitro test is currently accepted for the differentiation of ocular irritants (GHS Category 2) and non-irritants (GHS No Category). Human reconstructed tissue models have been suggested for incorporation into a tiered testing strategy to ultimately replace the Draize rabbit eye irritation test (OECD TG 405). The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the EpiOcular(TM) reconstructed cornea-like tissue model and the COLIPA pre-validated EpiOcular Eye Irritation Test (EpiOcular-EIT) could be used as suitable components of this testing strategy. The in-house validation of the EpiOcular-EIT was performed by using 60 test substances, including a broad variety of chemicals and formulations for which in vivo data (from the Draize rabbit eye irritation test) were available. The test substances fell into the following categories: 18 severe irritants/corrosives (Category 1), 21 irritants (Category 2), and 21 non-irritants (No Category). Test substances that decreased tissue viability to ≤ 60% (compared to the negative control tissue) were considered to be eye irritants (Category 1/2). Test substances resulting in tissue viability of > 60% were considered to be non-irritants (No Category). For the assessed dataset and the classification cut-off of 60% viability, the EpiOcular-EIT provided 98% and 84% sensitivity, 64% and 90% specificity, and 85% and 86% overall accuracy for the literature reference and BASF proprietary substances, respectively. Applying a 50% tissue viability cut-off to distinguish between irritants and non-irritants resulted in 93% and 82% sensitivity, 68% and 100% specificity, and 84% and 88% accuracy for the literature reference and BASF proprietary substances, respectively. Further, in the EpiOcular-EIT (60% cut-off), 100% of severely irritating substances under-predicted by the BCOP assay were classified as Category 1/2. The results obtained in this study, based on 60 test substances, indicate that the EpiOcular-EIT and the BCOP assay can be combined in a testing strategy to identify strong/severe eye irritants (Category 1), moderate and mild eye irritants (Category 2), and non-irritants (No Category) in routine testing. In particular, when the bottom-up strategy with the 60% viability cut-off was employed, none of the severely irritating substances (Category 1) were under-predicted to be non-irritant. Sensitivity for Category 1/2 substances was 100% for literature reference substances and 89% for BASF SE proprietary substances.

摘要

2009 年,牛角膜混浊和通透性(BCOP)试验被监管机构接受,用于鉴定腐蚀性和严重眼部刺激性物质(全球协调系统[GHS]类别 1)。然而,目前还没有用于区分眼部刺激性物质(GHS 类别 2)和非刺激性物质(GHS 无类别)的体外试验。已经提出了人类重建组织模型,以纳入分层测试策略中,最终取代兔眼刺激性试验(OECD TG 405)。本研究的目的是评估 EpiOcular(TM)重建角膜样组织模型和 COLIPA 预先验证的 EpiOcular 眼部刺激性试验(EpiOcular-EIT)是否可作为该测试策略的合适组成部分。通过使用 60 种测试物质对 EpiOcular-EIT 进行了内部验证,其中包括广泛的化学物质和制剂,这些物质具有体内数据(来自兔眼刺激性试验)。测试物质分为以下几类:18 种严重刺激性物质/腐蚀性物质(类别 1)、21 种刺激性物质(类别 2)和 21 种非刺激性物质(无类别)。组织活力降低至≤60%(与阴性对照组织相比)的测试物质被认为是眼部刺激性物质(类别 1/2)。组织活力>60%的测试物质被认为是非刺激性物质(无类别)。对于评估数据集和 60%活力的分类截止值,EpiOcular-EIT 对文献参考物质和巴斯夫专有物质分别提供了 98%和 84%的灵敏度、64%和 90%的特异性和 85%和 86%的总体准确性。应用 50%组织活力截止值来区分刺激性物质和非刺激性物质,对于文献参考物质和巴斯夫专有物质,灵敏度分别为 93%和 82%、特异性分别为 68%和 100%、准确性分别为 84%和 88%。此外,在 EpiOcular-EIT(60%截止值)中,BCOP 测定法预测为严重刺激性的物质全部被分类为类别 1/2。本研究基于 60 种测试物质得出的结果表明,EpiOcular-EIT 和 BCOP 测定法可结合在测试策略中,以在常规测试中识别强/严重眼部刺激性物质(类别 1)、中度和轻度眼部刺激性物质(类别 2)和非刺激性物质(无类别)。特别是,当采用 60%活力截止值的自下而上策略时,没有一种严重刺激性物质(类别 1)被预测为非刺激性物质。文献参考物质的类别 1/2 物质的灵敏度为 100%,巴斯夫 SE 专有物质的灵敏度为 89%。

相似文献

1
In-house validation of the EpiOcular(TM) eye irritation test and its combination with the bovine corneal opacity and permeability test for the assessment of ocular irritation.EpiOcular(TM)眼刺激性试验的内部验证及其与牛角膜混浊和通透性试验相结合评估眼部刺激性。
Altern Lab Anim. 2011 Sep;39(4):365-87. doi: 10.1177/026119291103900410.
2
The EpiOcular™ Eye Irritation Test is the Method of Choice for the In Vitro Eye Irritation Testing of Agrochemical Formulations: Correlation Analysis of EpiOcular Eye Irritation Test and BCOP Test Data According to the UN GHS, US EPA and Brazil ANVISA Classification Schemes.EpiOcular™眼刺激试验是农用化学品制剂体外眼刺激试验的首选方法:根据联合国全球化学品统一分类和标签制度(GHS)、美国环境保护局(EPA)和巴西国家卫生监督局(ANVISA)分类方案对EpiOcular眼刺激试验和牛角膜混浊和通透性(BCOP)试验数据进行相关性分析 。
Altern Lab Anim. 2015 Jul;43(3):181-98. doi: 10.1177/026119291504300307.
3
Development of the EpiOcular(TM) eye irritation test for hazard identification and labelling of eye irritating chemicals in response to the requirements of the EU cosmetics directive and REACH legislation.为了响应欧盟化妆品指令和 REACH 法规的要求,开发了 EpiOcular(TM) 眼刺激性测试,用于对眼部刺激性化学品进行危害识别和标签标注。
Altern Lab Anim. 2011 Sep;39(4):339-64. doi: 10.1177/026119291103900409.
4
Two-stage bottom-up tiered approach combining several alternatives for identification of eye irritation potential of chemicals including insoluble or volatile substances.两阶段自下而上分层方法,结合了几种替代方案,用于鉴定包括不溶性或挥发性物质在内的化学物质的眼睛刺激性潜力。
Toxicol In Vitro. 2012 Oct;26(7):1199-208. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2012.06.008. Epub 2012 Jun 26.
5
CON4EI: CONsortium for in vitro Eye Irritation testing strategy - EpiOcular™ time-to-toxicity (EpiOcular ET-50) protocols for hazard identification and labelling of eye irritating chemicals.CON4EI:体外眼刺激试验策略联盟——EpiOcular™ 致毒时间(EpiOcular ET-50)协议,用于识别和标记眼部刺激性化学物质的危害。
Toxicol In Vitro. 2018 Jun;49:34-52. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2017.08.019. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
6
Eye irritation testing of nanomaterials using the EpiOcular™ eye irritation test and the bovine corneal opacity and permeability assay.使用EpiOcular™眼刺激试验和牛角膜混浊与通透性测定法对纳米材料进行眼刺激测试。
Part Fibre Toxicol. 2016 Apr 15;13:18. doi: 10.1186/s12989-016-0128-6.
7
The EpiOcular Eye Irritation Test (EIT) for hazard identification and labelling of eye irritating chemicals: protocol optimisation for solid materials and the results after extended shipment.用于眼部刺激性化学品危害识别与标签标注的EpiOcular眼刺激试验(EIT):固体材料的方案优化及延长运输后的结果
Altern Lab Anim. 2015 May;43(2):101-27. doi: 10.1177/026119291504300205.
8
CON4EI: Development of serious eye damage and eye irritation testing strategies with respect to the requirements of the UN GHS/EU CLP hazard categories.CON4EI:根据联合国全球化学品统一分类和标签制度(GHS)/欧盟的 CLP 危害分类的要求,制定严重眼损伤和眼刺激测试策略。
Toxicol In Vitro. 2018 Jun;49:2-5. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2017.06.011. Epub 2017 Jun 16.
9
CON4EI: Development of testing strategies for hazard identification and labelling for serious eye damage and eye irritation of chemicals.CON4EI:化学物质严重眼损伤和眼刺激危险识别和标签测试策略的制定。
Toxicol In Vitro. 2018 Jun;49:99-115. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2017.09.008. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
10
Defined approaches to classify agrochemical formulations into EPA hazard categories developed using EpiOcular reconstructed human corneal epithelium and bovine corneal opacity and permeability assays.使用EpiOcular重建人角膜上皮以及牛角膜混浊和通透性试验,制定了将农用化学品制剂分类为美国环境保护局危害类别的明确方法。
Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2024 Mar;43(1):58-68. doi: 10.1080/15569527.2023.2275029. Epub 2023 Oct 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of a Vitrification Preservation Process for Bioengineered Epithelial Constructs.生物工程化上皮构建体的玻璃化保存过程的开发。
Cells. 2022 Mar 25;11(7):1115. doi: 10.3390/cells11071115.
2
Same-chemical comparison of nonanimal eye irritation test methods: Bovine corneal opacity and permeability, EpiOcular™, isolated chicken eye, ocular Irritection®, OptiSafe™, and short time exposure.非动物眼刺激性试验方法的同化学比较:牛角膜混浊和通透性、EpiOcular™、鸡眼离体、眼刺激性检测试剂盒、OptiSafe™和短时间暴露。
Toxicol In Vitro. 2021 Apr;72:105070. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2020.105070. Epub 2020 Dec 19.
3
Machine Learning of Toxicological Big Data Enables Read-Across Structure Activity Relationships (RASAR) Outperforming Animal Test Reproducibility.
毒理学大数据的机器学习可实现优于动物测试重现性的读交叉结构活性关系 (RASAR)。
Toxicol Sci. 2018 Sep 1;165(1):198-212. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfy152.
4
Green Toxicology: a strategy for sustainable chemical and material development.绿色毒理学:可持续化学与材料开发策略
Environ Sci Eur. 2017;29(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12302-017-0115-z. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
5
Eye irritation testing of nanomaterials using the EpiOcular™ eye irritation test and the bovine corneal opacity and permeability assay.使用EpiOcular™眼刺激试验和牛角膜混浊与通透性测定法对纳米材料进行眼刺激测试。
Part Fibre Toxicol. 2016 Apr 15;13:18. doi: 10.1186/s12989-016-0128-6.
6
Analysis of Draize eye irritation testing and its prediction by mining publicly available 2008-2014 REACH data.通过挖掘2008 - 2014年可公开获取的REACH数据对德莱兹眼刺激试验进行分析及其预测。
ALTEX. 2016;33(2):123-34. doi: 10.14573/altex.1510053. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
7
Eye Irritation Test (EIT) for Hazard Identification of Eye Irritating Chemicals using Reconstructed Human Cornea-like Epithelial (RhCE) Tissue Model.使用重建的人角膜样上皮(RhCE)组织模型对眼刺激性化学物质进行危害识别的眼刺激试验(EIT)
J Vis Exp. 2015 Aug 23(102):e52979. doi: 10.3791/52979.
8
Determining the Depth of Injury in Bioengineered Tissue Models of Cornea and Conjunctiva for the Prediction of All Three Ocular GHS Categories.确定用于预测所有三种眼用全球统一制度类别的角膜和结膜生物工程组织模型中的损伤深度。
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 10;9(12):e114181. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114181. eCollection 2014.
9
Nanostructure-based platforms-current prospective in ophthalmic drug delivery.基于纳米结构的平台——眼科药物递送的当前前景。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2014 Jul;62(7):768-72. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.138301.