• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胸外科领域手术的分类——编码可靠性研究

Classification of procedures in the domain of thoracic surgery--a study of reliability in coding.

作者信息

Carlsson M, Löfström L, Ahlfeldt H

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Engineering Medical Informatics, Linköping University, Sweden.

出版信息

J Med Syst. 2001 Feb;25(1):47-61. doi: 10.1023/a:1005636432502.

DOI:10.1023/a:1005636432502
PMID:11288481
Abstract

This paper relates a study of reliability of coding of surgical procedures in the domain of thoracic surgery. The reliability measured is inter-coder variability in form of agreement. Four classifications were used by four physicians on 100 patient cases. The classifications, having differing granularity and structure, were analyzed using a statistical method (kappa). These results are discussed and related to the differences between the classifications. One of the topics for discussion is how the granularity affects the degree of agreement, coupled to the usefulness of the classification. Also the concept of using formal methods for representing classifications is discussed, how this will affect how classifications are designed and used.

摘要

本文讲述了一项关于胸外科领域手术程序编码可靠性的研究。所测量的可靠性是以一致性形式存在的编码员间变异性。四位医生对100个患者病例使用了四种分类。这些具有不同粒度和结构的分类采用一种统计方法(kappa)进行分析。对这些结果进行了讨论,并将其与分类之间的差异相关联。讨论的主题之一是粒度如何影响一致程度,并与分类的有用性相关联。此外,还讨论了使用形式化方法表示分类的概念,以及这将如何影响分类的设计和使用。

相似文献

1
Classification of procedures in the domain of thoracic surgery--a study of reliability in coding.胸外科领域手术的分类——编码可靠性研究
J Med Syst. 2001 Feb;25(1):47-61. doi: 10.1023/a:1005636432502.
2
Inter-observer reliability of computed tomographic classifications of diverticulitis.计算机断层扫描对憩室炎分类的观察者间可靠性
Colorectal Dis. 2014 Jun;16(6):O212-9. doi: 10.1111/codi.12533.
3
Improving the reliability of stroke subgroup classification using the Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) criteria.使用急性卒中治疗中ORG 10172试验(TOAST)标准提高卒中亚组分类的可靠性。
Stroke. 2001 May;32(5):1091-8. doi: 10.1161/01.str.32.5.1091.
4
[Comparative analysis of the inter-observer reliability and intra-observer reproducibility between Lenke and PUMC classification systems for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis].[青少年特发性脊柱侧凸Lenke与PUMC分类系统观察者间可靠性及观察者内可重复性的比较分析]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2007 Sep 4;87(33):2332-5.
5
Do thoraco-lumbar spinal injuries classification systems exhibit lower inter- and intra-observer agreement than other fractures classifications?: A comparison using fractures of the trochanteric area of the proximal femur as contrast model.与其他骨折分类系统相比,胸腰椎脊柱损伤分类系统的观察者间和观察者内一致性是否更低?:以股骨近端转子区骨折作为对比模型的比较研究
Injury. 2016 Apr;47(4):859-64. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.11.016. Epub 2015 Nov 24.
6
Reliability of a four-column classification for tibial plateau fractures.胫骨平台骨折四柱分类法的可靠性
Int Orthop. 2017 Sep;41(9):1881-1886. doi: 10.1007/s00264-017-3543-x. Epub 2017 Jul 7.
7
An assessment of the reliability of the Enneking and Weinstein-Boriani-Biagini classifications for staging of primary spinal tumors by the Spine Oncology Study Group.脊柱肿瘤研究组对Enneking分类法以及Weinstein-Boriani-Biagini分类法在原发性脊柱肿瘤分期中的可靠性评估。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Feb 15;34(4):384-91. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181971283.
8
Documentation and coding of ED patient encounters: an evaluation of the accuracy of an electronic medical record.急诊患者诊疗记录与编码:电子病历准确性评估
Am J Emerg Med. 2006 Oct;24(6):664-78. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2006.02.005.
9
Comparison of reliability between the Lenke and King classification systems for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using radiographs that were not premeasured.使用未经预先测量的X线片比较Lenke和King青少年特发性脊柱侧凸分类系统之间的可靠性。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Jun 1;28(11):1148-56; discussion 1156-7. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000067265.52473.C3.
10
Is surgeons' experience important on intra- and inter-observer reliability of classifications used for adult femoral neck fracture?外科医生的经验对于成人股骨颈骨折分类的观察者内和观察者间可靠性是否重要?
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2016 Dec;50(6):601-605. doi: 10.1016/j.aott.2015.11.004. Epub 2016 Nov 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Regional variation in medical classification agreement: benchmarking the coding gap.医学分类一致性的区域差异:对编码差距进行基准测试。
J Med Syst. 2003 Oct;27(5):435-43. doi: 10.1023/a:1025607805588.

本文引用的文献

1
Coding Systems in Health Care.医疗保健中的编码系统
Yearb Med Inform. 1995(1):71-85.
2
Evaluation of three Swedish ICD-10 primary care versions: reliability and ease of use in diagnostic coding.三种瑞典版ICD - 10基层医疗版本的评估:诊断编码中的可靠性与易用性
Methods Inf Med. 2000 Dec;39(4-5):325-31.
3
Modelling and reclassification of surgical procedures--experiences from the use of GALEN methods in the domain of thoracic surgery.
Med Inform Internet Med. 2000 Apr-Jun;25(2):109-22. doi: 10.1080/14639230050058293.
4
Thesauri and formal classifications: terminologies for people and machines.叙词表与形式分类法:面向人和机器的术语体系
Methods Inf Med. 1998 Nov;37(4-5):501-9.
5
A model for the evaluation of computerised codes. The Gabrieli Medical Nomenclature as an example.一种用于评估计算机代码的模型。以加布里埃利医学术语为例。
Aust Fam Physician. 1997 Jul;26 Suppl 2:S76-8.
6
The GRAIL concept modelling language for medical terminology.用于医学术语的GRAIL概念建模语言。
Artif Intell Med. 1997 Feb;9(2):139-71. doi: 10.1016/s0933-3657(96)00369-7.
7
Statistical methodology for reliability studies.可靠性研究的统计方法。
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1991 Feb;14(2):119-32.