• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Compliance, satisfaction, and quality of life of patients with colorectal cancer receiving home chemotherapy or outpatient treatment: a randomised controlled trial.接受家庭化疗或门诊治疗的结直肠癌患者的依从性、满意度和生活质量:一项随机对照试验。
BMJ. 2001 Apr 7;322(7290):826. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7290.826.
2
Economic and patient-reported outcomes of outpatient home-based versus inpatient hospital-based chemotherapy for patients with colorectal cancer.门诊家庭为基础的与住院医院为基础的化疗对结直肠癌患者的经济学和患者报告结局比较。
Support Care Cancer. 2011 Jul;19(7):971-8. doi: 10.1007/s00520-010-0917-7. Epub 2010 May 23.
3
A systematic overview of chemotherapy effects in colorectal cancer.结直肠癌化疗效果的系统综述。
Acta Oncol. 2001;40(2-3):282-308. doi: 10.1080/02841860151116367.
4
3-month versus 6-month adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with high-risk stage II and III colorectal cancer: 3-year follow-up of the SCOT non-inferiority RCT.高危 II 期和 III 期结直肠癌患者的 3 个月与 6 个月辅助化疗:SCOT 非劣效 RCT 的 3 年随访。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Dec;23(64):1-88. doi: 10.3310/hta23640.
5
[Home chemotherapy and outpatient treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer].[转移性结直肠癌的家庭化疗与门诊治疗]
Nihon Rinsho. 2003 Sep;61 Suppl 7:333-7.
6
Adjuvant regional chemotherapy and systemic chemotherapy versus systemic chemotherapy alone in patients with stage II-III colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled phase III trial.II-III期结直肠癌患者辅助区域化疗与全身化疗联合与单纯全身化疗的比较:一项多中心随机对照III期试验
Lancet Oncol. 2005 Jul;6(7):459-68. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(05)70222-9.
7
Randomised phase 2 trial of SIR-Spheres plus fluorouracil/leucovorin chemotherapy versus fluorouracil/leucovorin chemotherapy alone in advanced colorectal cancer.钇90微球联合氟尿嘧啶/亚叶酸钙化疗与单纯氟尿嘧啶/亚叶酸钙化疗治疗晚期结直肠癌的随机2期试验
J Surg Oncol. 2004 Nov 1;88(2):78-85. doi: 10.1002/jso.20141.
8
Capecitabine (Xeloda) improves medical resource use compared with 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin in a phase III trial conducted in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma.在一项针对晚期结直肠癌患者开展的III期试验中,与5-氟尿嘧啶加亚叶酸相比,卡培他滨(希罗达)改善了医疗资源的使用情况。
Eur J Cancer. 2001 Mar;37(5):597-604. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(00)00444-5.
9
Patient preference and pharmacokinetics of oral modulated UFT versus intravenous fluorouracil and leucovorin: a randomised crossover trial in advanced colorectal cancer.口服替加氟尿嘧啶复方制剂与静脉注射氟尿嘧啶和亚叶酸钙相比的患者偏好及药代动力学:一项晚期结直肠癌的随机交叉试验
Eur J Cancer. 2002 Feb;38(3):349-58. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(01)00371-9.
10
Adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil, L-folinic acid and levamisole for patients with colorectal cancer: non-randomised comparison of weekly versus four-weekly schedules--less pain, same gain. QUASAR Colorectal Cancer Study Group.5-氟尿嘧啶、亚叶酸钙和左旋咪唑辅助化疗用于结直肠癌患者:每周与每四周方案的非随机比较——疼痛减轻,疗效相同。QUASAR结直肠癌研究组
Ann Oncol. 2000 Aug;11(8):947-55. doi: 10.1023/a:1008303229469.

引用本文的文献

1
Hospital at home for oncologic patients: SEOM-SEHAD consensus on clinical practice.肿瘤患者的居家医院:SEOM-SEHAD关于临床实践的共识
Clin Transl Oncol. 2025 Apr 23. doi: 10.1007/s12094-025-03875-4.
2
Delivery of intravenous anti-cancer therapy at home versus in hospital or community settings for adults with cancer.成年癌症患者在家中与在医院或社区环境中接受静脉抗癌治疗的情况。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Apr 22;4(4):CD014861. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014861.pub2.
3
Ten-year follow-up of outcomes, patterns of care, and psychosocial burden in adolescent and young adult patients with bone sarcomas from a large cohort in a low-income and middle-income country.低收入和中等收入国家一个大型队列中骨肉瘤青少年和青年患者的结局、护理模式及心理社会负担的十年随访
Cancer. 2025 Jan 1;131(1):e35547. doi: 10.1002/cncr.35547. Epub 2024 Sep 19.
4
National expert consensus on home-administered oncologic therapies in Spain.西班牙居家肿瘤治疗国家专家共识
Front Oncol. 2024 Feb 16;14:1335344. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1335344. eCollection 2024.
5
Balancing benefits and risks in lung cancer therapies: patient preferences for lung cancer treatment alternatives.肺癌治疗中的收益与风险平衡:患者对肺癌治疗方案的偏好
Front Psychol. 2023 Jun 21;14:1062830. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1062830. eCollection 2023.
6
Overcoming barriers to patient adherence: the case for developing innovative drug delivery systems.克服患者依从性障碍:开发创新药物传递系统的案例。
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2023 May;22(5):387-409. doi: 10.1038/s41573-023-00670-0. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
7
Home Cancer Care Research: A Bibliometric and Visualization Analysis (1990-2021).家庭癌症护理研究:文献计量学和可视化分析(1990-2021)。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 12;19(20):13116. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192013116.
8
Evaluation of adverse events and health-related quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer receiving ambulatory home-based chemotherapy in Thailand.评价在泰国接受门诊家庭化疗的结直肠癌患者的不良事件和与健康相关的生活质量。
Nurs Open. 2021 Nov;8(6):3036-3044. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1016. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
9
Impacts on health outcomes and on resources utilization for anticancer drugs injection at home, a complex intervention: a systematic review.家庭注射抗癌药物的复杂干预对健康结果和资源利用的影响:系统评价。
Support Care Cancer. 2021 Oct;29(10):5581-5596. doi: 10.1007/s00520-021-06145-5. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
10
Safety and family satisfaction of a home-delivered chemotherapy program for children with cancer.儿童癌症家庭化疗项目的安全性和家庭满意度。
Ital J Pediatr. 2021 Feb 26;47(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s13052-021-00993-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Home or hospital? An evaluation of the costs, preferences, and outcomes of domiciliary chemotherapy.在家还是在医院?对居家化疗的成本、偏好及结果的评估。
Int J Health Serv. 2000;30(3):557-79. doi: 10.2190/CY03-EV15-K38Y-X4AA.
2
A randomised crossover trial of chemotherapy in the home: patient preferences and cost analysis.家庭化疗随机交叉试验:患者偏好与成本分析。
Med J Aust. 2000 Aug 7;173(3):125-7.
3
The health and cost effects of substituting home care for inpatient acute care: a review of the evidence.用家庭护理替代住院急性护理的健康和成本影响:证据综述。
CMAJ. 1999 Apr 20;160(8):1151-5.
4
Effectiveness of home care programmes for patients with incurable cancer on their quality of life and time spent in hospital: systematic review.针对无法治愈癌症患者的家庭护理计划对其生活质量和住院时间的有效性:系统评价
BMJ. 1998 Jun 27;316(7149):1939-44. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7149.1939.
5
Home chemotherapy for cancer patients: cost analysis and safety.癌症患者的居家化疗:成本分析与安全性
Med J Aust. 1996 Aug 19;165(4):184-7. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1996.tb124921.x.
6
An historical perspective on home care policy.家庭护理政策的历史视角。
Milbank Q. 1993;71(1):129-66.
7
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology.欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织QLQ-C30:一种用于肿瘤学国际临床试验的生活质量评估工具。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993 Mar 3;85(5):365-76. doi: 10.1093/jnci/85.5.365.
8
A prospective, controlled evaluation of home chemotherapy for children with cancer.一项针对癌症患儿家庭化疗的前瞻性对照评估。
Pediatrics. 1995 Jun;95(6):896-900.
9
Compliance with cancer therapy by patients and physicians.患者和医生对癌症治疗的依从性。
Am J Med. 1983 Apr;74(4):673-8. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(83)91026-4.
10
Therapeutic compliance and the cancer patient.治疗依从性与癌症患者
Health Educ Q. 1984 Spring;10 Suppl:43-56.

接受家庭化疗或门诊治疗的结直肠癌患者的依从性、满意度和生活质量:一项随机对照试验。

Compliance, satisfaction, and quality of life of patients with colorectal cancer receiving home chemotherapy or outpatient treatment: a randomised controlled trial.

作者信息

Borras J M, Sanchez-Hernandez A, Navarro M, Martinez M, Mendez E, Ponton J L, Espinas J A, Germa J R

机构信息

Cancer Prevention and Control Unit, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Gran Via Km 2,7 s/n, 08907-Hospitalet, Spain.

出版信息

BMJ. 2001 Apr 7;322(7290):826. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7290.826.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.322.7290.826
PMID:11290635
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC30558/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare chemotherapy given at home with outpatient treatment in terms of colorectal cancer patients' safety, compliance, use of health services, quality of life, and satisfaction with treatment.

DESIGN

Randomised controlled trial.

SETTING

Large teaching hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

87 patients receiving adjuvant or palliative chemotherapy for colorectal cancer.

INTERVENTIONS

Treatment with fluorouracil (with or without folinic acid or levamisole) at outpatient clinic or at home.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Treatment toxicity; patients' compliance with treatment, quality of life, satisfaction with care, and use of health resources.

RESULTS

42 patients were treated at outpatient clinic and 45 at home. The two groups were balanced in terms of age, sex, site of cancer, and disease stage. Treatment related toxicity was similar in the two groups (difference 7% (95% confidence interval -12% to 26%)), but there were more voluntary withdrawals from treatment in the outpatient group than in the home group (14% v 2%, difference 12% (1% to 24%)). There were no differences between groups in terms of quality of life scores during and after treatment. Levels of patient satisfaction were higher in the home treatment group, specifically with regard to information received and nursing care. There were no significant differences in use of health services.

CONCLUSIONS

Home chemotherapy seemed an acceptable and safe alternative to hospital treatment for patients with colorectal cancer that may improve compliance and satisfaction with treatment.

摘要

目的

比较在家化疗与门诊治疗在结直肠癌患者安全性、依从性、卫生服务利用、生活质量及治疗满意度方面的差异。

设计

随机对照试验。

地点

大型教学医院。

参与者

87例接受结直肠癌辅助或姑息化疗的患者。

干预措施

在门诊或家中使用氟尿嘧啶(加或不加亚叶酸或左旋咪唑)进行治疗。

主要观察指标

治疗毒性;患者的治疗依从性、生活质量、护理满意度及卫生资源利用情况。

结果

42例患者在门诊接受治疗,45例在家中接受治疗。两组在年龄、性别、癌症部位及疾病分期方面均衡。两组治疗相关毒性相似(差异7%(95%置信区间-12%至26%)),但门诊组自愿退出治疗的患者比在家治疗组多(14%对2%,差异12%(1%至24%))。两组在治疗期间及治疗后的生活质量评分方面无差异。在家治疗组患者满意度更高,尤其是在信息获取和护理方面。卫生服务利用方面无显著差异。

结论

对于结直肠癌患者,在家化疗似乎是一种可接受且安全的替代医院治疗的方法,可能会提高治疗依从性和满意度。