Fronstin P
EBRI Issue Brief. 2001 Mar(231):1-30.
This Issue Brief discusses the emerging issue of "defined contribution" (DC) health benefits. The term "defined contribution" is used to describe a wide variety of approaches to the provision of health benefits, all of which have in common a shift in the responsibility for payment and selection of health care services from employers to employees. DC health benefits often are mentioned in the context of enabling employers to control their outlay for health benefits by avoiding increases in health care costs. DC health benefits may also shift responsibility for choosing a health plan and the associated risks of choosing a plan from employers to employees. There are three primary reasons why some employers currently are considering some sort of DC approach. First, they are once again looking for ways to keep their health care cost increases in line with overall inflation. Second, some employers are concerned that the public "backlash" against managed care will result in new legislation, regulations, and litigation that will further increase their health care costs if they do not distance themselves from health care decisions. Third, employers have modified not only most employee benefit plans, but labor market practices in general, by giving workers more choice, control, and flexibility. DC-type health benefits have existed as cafeteria plans since the 1980s. A cafeteria plan gives each employee the opportunity to determine the allocation of his or her total compensation (within employer-defined limits) among various employee benefits (primarily retirement or health). Most types of DC health benefits currently being discussed could be provided within the existing employment-based health insurance system, with or without the use of cafeteria plans. They could also allow employees to purchase health insurance directly from insurers, or they could drive new technologies and new forms of risk pooling through which health care services are provided and financed. DC health benefits differ from DC retirement plans. Under a DC health plan, employees may face different premiums based on their personal health risk and perhaps other factors such as age and geographic location. Their ability to afford health insurance may depend on how premiums are regulated by the state and how much money their employer provides. In contrast, under a DC retirement plan, employers' contributions are based on the same percentage of income for all employees, but employees are not subject to paying different prices for the same investment.
本问题简报讨论了“固定缴款型”(DC)健康福利这一新兴问题。“固定缴款型”一词用于描述提供健康福利的多种方式,所有这些方式的共同之处在于,支付和选择医疗服务的责任从雇主转移到了员工身上。DC健康福利经常在这样的背景下被提及,即让雇主通过避免医疗成本增加来控制其健康福利支出。DC健康福利还可能将选择健康计划的责任以及选择计划所带来的相关风险从雇主转移到员工身上。目前一些雇主考虑采用某种DC方式主要有三个原因。首先,他们再次寻求方法,使医疗成本的增长与总体通货膨胀保持一致。其次,一些雇主担心公众对管理式医疗的“强烈反对”会导致新的立法、监管和诉讼,如果他们不与医疗决策保持距离,这些将进一步增加其医疗成本。第三,雇主不仅修改了大多数员工福利计划,而且总体上改变了劳动力市场做法,给予员工更多的选择、控制权和灵活性。自20世纪80年代以来,DC型健康福利就以自助式福利计划的形式存在。自助式福利计划让每位员工有机会在雇主设定的范围内,确定其总薪酬在各种员工福利(主要是退休福利或健康福利)之间的分配。目前讨论的大多数DC健康福利类型可以在现有的基于就业的医疗保险体系内提供,无论是否使用自助式福利计划。它们还可以允许员工直接从保险公司购买医疗保险,或者推动新技术和新的风险分担形式,通过这些形式来提供和资助医疗服务。DC健康福利与DC退休计划不同。在DC健康计划下,员工可能因其个人健康风险以及年龄和地理位置等其他因素而面临不同的保费。他们购买医疗保险的能力可能取决于该州对保费的监管方式以及雇主提供的资金数额。相比之下,在DC退休计划下,雇主对所有员工的缴款基于相同的收入百分比,但员工不会因相同的投资而支付不同的价格。