• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于选择的改革对医疗保险是否有效?来自联邦雇员健康福利计划的证据。

Will choice-based reform work for Medicare? Evidence from the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program.

作者信息

Florence Curtis S, Atherly Adam, Thorpe Kenneth E

机构信息

Department of Health Policy and Management, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2006 Oct;41(5):1741-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00580.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00580.x
PMID:16987300
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1955303/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

. To examine the effect of premiums and benefits on the health plan choices of older enrollees who choose Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (FEHBP) health plans as their primary payer.

DATA SOURCES

Administrative enrollment data from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) and plan premiums and benefits data taken from the Checkbook Guide to health plans.

STUDY DESIGN

We estimate individual plan choice models where the choice of health plan is a function of out-of-pocket premium, actuarial value, plan attributes, and individual characteristics. Plan attributes include plan structure (fee-for-service/preferred provider organization, point-of-service, or health maintenance organization), drug benefit structure, and whether or not the plan covers other types of spending such as dental services and diabetic supplies. The models are estimated by conditional logit. Our study focuses on three populations that currently choose FEHBP as their primary health care coverage and are similar to the Medicare population: current employees and retirees who are approaching the age of Medicare eligibility (ages 60-64) and current federal employees age 65+. Current employees age 65+ are eligible for Medicare, but their FEHBP plan is their primary payer. Retirees and employees 60-64 are not yet eligible for Medicare but are similar in many respects to recently age-eligible Medicare beneficiaries. We also estimate our model for current employees age 55 and younger as a comparison group.

DATA COLLECTION METHODS

We select a random sample of retirees and employees age 60-64, as well as all current employees age 65+, from the OPM administrative database for the calendar year 2001. The plan choices available to each person are determined by the plans participating in their metropolitan statistical area. We match plan premium and attribute information from the Checkbook Guide to each plan in the enrollee's list of choices.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

We find that current workers 65+, 60-64, and non-Medicare eligible retirees are sensitive to variation in plan premiums. The premium elasticities for these groups are similar in magnitude to those of the age 55 and under employee group. Older workers and retirees not yet eligible for Medicare are willing to pay a substantial amount for plans with open provider networks. The willingness to pay for open networks is significantly greater for these groups than for younger employees. Willingness to pay for open network plans varies significantly by income, but varies little by age within group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our finding that older workers and non-Medicare eligible retirees are sensitive to plan premiums suggests that choice-based reform of Medicare would lead to cost-conscious choices by Medicare beneficiaries. However, our finding that these groups are willing to pay more for open network plans than younger employees suggest that higher risk individuals may migrate toward higher benefit, higher cost plans. Our findings on the relationship between income and willingness to pay for open network plans suggest that means testing is a viable reform for lowering Medicare program costs.

摘要

目的

研究保费和福利对选择联邦雇员健康福利计划(FEHBP)作为主要支付方的老年参保者健康计划选择的影响。

数据来源

人事管理办公室(OPM)的行政参保数据,以及从健康计划支票簿指南获取的计划保费和福利数据。

研究设计

我们估计个体计划选择模型,其中健康计划的选择是自付保费、精算价值、计划属性和个体特征的函数。计划属性包括计划结构(按服务收费/优选提供者组织、服务点或健康维护组织)、药品福利结构,以及该计划是否涵盖其他类型的支出,如牙科服务和糖尿病用品。这些模型通过条件logit进行估计。我们的研究聚焦于目前选择FEHBP作为主要医疗保健覆盖的三类人群,他们与医疗保险人群相似:即将达到医疗保险资格年龄的在职员工和退休人员(60 - 64岁)以及65岁及以上的现任联邦雇员。65岁及以上的在职员工有资格享受医疗保险,但他们的FEHBP计划是其主要支付方。60 - 64岁的退休人员和员工尚未有资格享受医疗保险,但在许多方面与最近达到年龄资格的医疗保险受益人相似。我们还将55岁及以下的在职员工作为对照组估计我们的模型。

数据收集方法

我们从2001年的OPM行政数据库中随机抽取60 - 64岁的退休人员和员工样本,以及所有65岁及以上的现任员工。每个人可选择的计划由其所在大都市统计区参与的计划决定。我们将支票簿指南中的计划保费和属性信息与参保者选择列表中的每个计划进行匹配。

主要发现

我们发现65岁及以上的在职员工、60 - 64岁的员工以及无医疗保险资格的退休人员对计划保费的变化较为敏感。这些群体的保费弹性在幅度上与55岁及以下员工群体相似。尚未有资格享受医疗保险的老年员工和退休人员愿意为拥有开放提供者网络的计划支付可观的费用。这些群体为开放网络支付的意愿明显高于年轻员工。为开放网络计划支付的意愿因收入差异显著,但在群体内年龄差异不大。

结论

我们发现老年员工和无医疗保险资格的退休人员对计划保费敏感,这表明基于选择的医疗保险改革将导致医疗保险受益人做出注重成本的选择。然而,我们发现这些群体比年轻员工更愿意为开放网络计划支付更多费用,这表明高风险个体可能会转向福利更高、成本更高的计划。我们关于收入与为开放网络计划支付意愿之间关系的发现表明,收入调查是降低医疗保险项目成本的一项可行改革。

相似文献

1
Will choice-based reform work for Medicare? Evidence from the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program.基于选择的改革对医疗保险是否有效?来自联邦雇员健康福利计划的证据。
Health Serv Res. 2006 Oct;41(5):1741-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00580.x.
2
The health plan choices of retirees under managed competition.管理式竞争下退休人员的健康保险计划选择
Health Serv Res. 2000 Dec;35(5 Pt 1):949-76.
3
Medicare on life support: will it survive?处于维持生命状态的医疗保险:它能挺过去吗?
EBRI Issue Brief. 1997 Sep(189):1-22.
4
Savings needed to fund health insurance and health care expenses in retirement: findings from a simulation model.退休后用于支付医疗保险和医疗费用所需的储蓄:来自模拟模型的结果。
EBRI Issue Brief. 2008 May(317):1-2, 4-27.
5
Features of employment-based health plans.基于就业的健康保险计划的特点。
EBRI Issue Brief. 1998 Sep(201):1-21.
6
Early experience with employee choice of consumer-directed health plans and satisfaction with enrollment.员工选择消费者导向型健康计划的早期体验及对参保的满意度。
Health Serv Res. 2004 Aug;39(4 Pt 2):1141-58. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00279.x.
7
The Federal Employees Health Benefits Plan: implications for medicare reform.联邦雇员健康福利计划:对医疗保险改革的影响
Inquiry. 1999 Summer;36(2):188-99.
8
Determinants of Medicare plan choices: are beneficiaries more influenced by premiums or benefits?医疗保险计划选择的决定因素:受益人受保费还是福利的影响更大?
Am J Manag Care. 2015 Jul;21(7):498-504.
9
How does the employer contribution for the federal employees health benefits program influence plan selection?联邦雇员健康福利计划中的雇主缴款如何影响计划选择?
Health Aff (Millwood). 2003 Mar-Apr;22(2):211-8. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.22.2.211.
10
The Roles of Cost and Quality Information in Medicare Advantage Plan Enrollment Decisions: an Observational Study.成本和质量信息在医疗保险优势计划参保决策中的作用:一项观察性研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Feb;31(2):234-241. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3467-3. Epub 2015 Aug 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Switching Costs in Medicare Advantage.医疗保险优势中的转换成本。
Forum Health Econ Policy. 2020 Mar 5;23(1):20190023. doi: 10.1515/fhep-2019-0023.
2
Demographic factors and hospital size predict patient satisfaction variance--implications for hospital value-based purchasing.人口统计学因素和医院规模可预测患者满意度差异——对医院基于价值的采购的启示
J Hosp Med. 2015 Aug;10(8):503-9. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2371. Epub 2015 May 4.
3
Comparison of interferon-γ release assay to two cut-off points of tuberculin skin test to detect latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in primary health care workers.在初级卫生保健工作者中,比较干扰素-γ释放试验与结核菌素皮肤试验两个临界值以检测潜伏性结核分枝杆菌感染的情况。
PLoS One. 2014 Aug 19;9(8):e102773. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102773. eCollection 2014.
4
Switching health insurance plans: results from a health survey.医疗保险计划转换:一项健康调查的结果。
Health Care Anal. 2011 Dec;19(4):312-28. doi: 10.1007/s10728-010-0154-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Health plan switching among members of the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program.联邦雇员健康福利计划成员之间的医保计划转换
Inquiry. 2005 Fall;42(3):255-65. doi: 10.5034/inquiryjrnl_42.3.255.
2
The effect of benefits, premiums, and health risk on health plan choice in the Medicare program.福利、保费和健康风险对医疗保险计划中健康计划选择的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2004 Aug;39(4 Pt 1):847-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00261.x.
3
How does the employer contribution for the federal employees health benefits program influence plan selection?联邦雇员健康福利计划中的雇主缴款如何影响计划选择?
Health Aff (Millwood). 2003 Mar-Apr;22(2):211-8. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.22.2.211.
4
The effect of health plan characteristics on Medicare+ Choice enrollment.健康计划特征对“老年医保+选择”参保率的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2003 Feb;38(1 Pt 1):113-35. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.00108.
5
The health plan choices of retirees under managed competition.管理式竞争下退休人员的健康保险计划选择
Health Serv Res. 2000 Dec;35(5 Pt 1):949-76.
6
Consumer health plan choice: current knowledge and future directions.消费者健康计划选择:当前知识与未来方向
Annu Rev Public Health. 1997;18:507-28. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.18.1.507.
7
The FEHBP as a model for a new Medicare program.联邦雇员健康福利计划作为新医疗保险计划的一个典范。
Health Aff (Millwood). 1995 Winter;14(4):47-61. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.14.4.47.