Merkesdal S, Ruof J, Huelsemann J L, Schoeffski O, Maetzel A, Mau W, Zeidler H
Division of Rheumatology, Hannover Medical School, Center for Health Economics, University of Hannover, Germany.
J Rheumatol. 2001 Mar;28(3):657-61.
The aim of our study was to comprehensively review and critically appraise the cost domains used in economic evaluations of the rheumatic diseases and to use this information to propose standardization of cost domains. The literature search identified 210 abstracts, 32 of which included original cost data. The listed cost categories were grouped into 3 major areas: (direct) health care costs, other (direct) disease related costs, and productivity costs (indirect costs). The number of individual cost categories was reduced by considering the following criteria: (1) inclusion of all relevant cost domains; (2) avoidance of double counting; (3) summarizing of related categories under one representative heading; (4) feasibility of level of aggregation. After adjustment for synonymous labeling, 38 cost categories remained. The subsequent development of a classification scheme of cost categories led to a set of 19 separate cost domains including 7 outpatient, 3 inpatient, 6 other disease related, and 3 productivity cost domains. This literature review indicates that cost assessment in economic evaluations in rheumatoid arthritis lacks standardization. A preliminary scheme to categorize cost assessment in rheumatic conditions is presented. The adoption of standards for economic evaluation would greatly facilitate national and international comparisons.
我们研究的目的是全面回顾并严格评估用于风湿性疾病经济评估的成本领域,并利用这些信息提出成本领域的标准化建议。文献检索共识别出210篇摘要,其中32篇包含原始成本数据。列出的成本类别被归为三大类:(直接)医疗保健成本、其他(直接)疾病相关成本和生产力成本(间接成本)。通过考虑以下标准减少了单个成本类别的数量:(1)纳入所有相关成本领域;(2)避免重复计算;(3)在一个代表性标题下汇总相关类别;(4)汇总水平的可行性。在对同义词标注进行调整后,剩下38个成本类别。随后制定的成本类别分类方案产生了一套19个独立的成本领域,包括7个门诊、3个住院、6个其他疾病相关和3个生产力成本领域。这篇文献综述表明,类风湿关节炎经济评估中的成本评估缺乏标准化。本文提出了一个对风湿性疾病成本评估进行分类的初步方案。采用经济评估标准将极大地促进国内和国际比较。