Storm F K, Gierson E D, Sparks F C, Barker W F
Surgery. 1975 Feb;77(2):261-7.
To evaluate whether mechanical vein dilatation and stripping of adventitia at the time of harvest may adversely alter the long-term fate of autogenous vein grafts, dogs were subjected to reversed femoral vein interposition grafting with either normal veins, mechanically dilated veins, or adventitially stripped veins. Vein segments taken before grafting and veins exposed in situ but not grafted served as controls. Animals were killed at 3 months, and five vein segments in each category were evaluated for gross and microscopic changes. All grafts subjected to arterial interposition displayed marked neointimal proliferation and fibrosis of the media and adventitia. Notably, both dilated and stripped veins appeared to be similar and were indistinguishable from normal veins that had been subjected to arterial interposition for the same duration. Veins exposed in situ but not subjected to arterial flow remained essentially normal. Adverse alterations attributed to vein dilatation or adventitial stripping were not apparent and should not be invoked in the mechanism of graft failure at 3 months' duration.
为了评估在采集时对静脉进行机械扩张和外膜剥离是否会对自体静脉移植物的长期转归产生不利影响,将犬用于逆行股静脉移植,分别使用正常静脉、机械扩张静脉或外膜剥离静脉。移植前采集的静脉段以及原位暴露但未移植的静脉作为对照。在3个月时处死动物,对每类中的5个静脉段进行大体和显微镜检查。所有进行动脉移植的移植物均显示出明显的内膜增生以及中膜和外膜纤维化。值得注意的是,扩张静脉和剥离静脉看起来相似,与相同时间进行动脉移植的正常静脉没有区别。原位暴露但未承受动脉血流的静脉基本保持正常。在3个月时,未发现归因于静脉扩张或外膜剥离的不良改变,在移植物失败机制中不应提及这些因素。