van Ameijden E J, Coutinho R A
Trimbos Institute (Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001 May;55(5):356-63. doi: 10.1136/jech.55.5.356.
To study community wide trends in injecting prevalence and trends in injecting transitions, and determinants.
Open cohort study with follow up every four months (Amsterdam Cohort Study). Generalised estimating equations were used for statistical analysis.
Amsterdam has adopted a harm reduction approach as drug policy.
996 drug users who were recruited from 1986 to 1998, mainly at methadone programmes, who paid 13620 cohort visits.
The prevalence of injecting decreased exponentially (66% to 36% in four to six monthly periods). Selective mortality and migration could maximally explain 33% of this decline. Instead, injecting initiation linearly decreased (4.1% to 0.7% per visit), cessation exponentially increased (10.0% to 17.1%), and relapse linearly decreased (21.3% to 11.8%). Non-injecting cocaine use (mainly pre-cooked, comparable to crack) and heroin use strongly increased. Trends were not attributable to changes in the study sample.
Harm reduction, including large scale needle exchange programmes, does not lead to an increase in injecting drug use. The injecting decline seems mainly attributable to ecological factors (for example, drug culture and market). Prevention of injecting is possible and peer-based interventions may be effective. The consequences of the recent upsurge in crack use requires further study.
研究社区范围内注射流行率的趋势、注射转变的趋势及其决定因素。
开放式队列研究,每四个月进行一次随访(阿姆斯特丹队列研究)。采用广义估计方程进行统计分析。
阿姆斯特丹已采用减少伤害方法作为毒品政策。
1986年至1998年招募的996名吸毒者,主要来自美沙酮项目,共进行了13620次队列访视。
注射流行率呈指数下降(在四至六个月期间从66%降至36%)。选择性死亡和迁移最多可解释这种下降的33%。相反,开始注射呈线性下降(每次访视从4.1%降至0.7%),停止注射呈指数上升(从10.0%升至17.1%),复吸呈线性下降(从21.3%降至11.8%)。非注射式可卡因使用(主要是预煮型,类似于快克)和海洛因使用大幅增加。这些趋势并非归因于研究样本的变化。
包括大规模针头交换项目在内的减少伤害措施不会导致注射吸毒增加。注射率下降似乎主要归因于生态因素(例如毒品文化和市场)。预防注射是可能的,基于同伴的干预措施可能有效。近期快克使用激增的后果需要进一步研究。