• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种外源酶制剂对瘤胃模拟技术(Rusitec)中微生物蛋白质合成、酶活性及与饲料附着的影响。

Effects of an exogenous enzyme preparation on microbial protein synthesis, enzyme activity and attachment to feed in the Rumen Simulation Technique (Rusitec).

作者信息

Wang Y, McAllister T A, Rode L M, Beauchemin K A, Morgavi D P, Nsereko V L, Iwaasa A D, Yang W

机构信息

Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Research Centre, P.O. Box 3000, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada T1J 4B1.

出版信息

Br J Nutr. 2001 Mar;85(3):325-32. doi: 10.1079/bjn2000277.

DOI:10.1079/bjn2000277
PMID:11299078
Abstract

The effects of an exogenous enzyme preparation, the application method and feed type on ruminal fermentation and microbial protein synthesis were investigated using the rumen simulation technique (Rusitec). Steam-rolled barley grain and chopped alfalfa hay were sprayed with water (control, C), an enzyme preparation with a predominant xylanase activity (EF), or autoclaved enzyme (AEF) 24 h prior to feeding, or the enzyme was supplied in the buffer infused into the Rusitec (EI). Microbial N incorporation was measured using (15NH4)2SO4 in the buffer. Spent feed bags were pummelled mechanically in buffer to segregate the feed particle-associated (FPA) and feed particle-bound (FPB) bacterial fractions. Enzymes applied to feed reduced neutral-detergent fibre content, and increased the concentration of reducing sugars in barley grain, but not alfalfa hay. Ruminal cellulolytic bacteria were more numerous with EF than with C. Disappearance of DM from barley grain was higher with EF than with C, but alfalfa was unaffected by EF. Treatment EF increased incorporation of 15N into FPA and FPB fractions at 24 and 48 h. In contrast, AEF reduced the 24 h values, relative to C; AEF and C were similar at 48 h. Infused enzyme (EI) did not affect 15N incorporation. Xylanase activity in effluent was increased by EF and EI, compared to C, but not by AEF. Xylanase activity in FPA was higher at 48 h than at 24 h with all treatments; it was higher with EF than C at 24 and 48 h, but was not altered by AEF or EI. Applying enzymes onto feeds before feeding was more effective than dosing directly into the artificial rumen for increasing ruminal fibrolytic activity.

摘要

采用瘤胃模拟技术(Rusitec)研究了外源酶制剂、应用方法和饲料类型对瘤胃发酵及微生物蛋白合成的影响。在饲喂前24小时,将蒸汽压片大麦和切碎的苜蓿干草喷水(对照,C)、喷一种以木聚糖酶活性为主的酶制剂(EF)或高压灭菌酶(AEF),或者将酶添加到注入Rusitec的缓冲液中(EI)。使用缓冲液中的(15NH4)2SO4测量微生物氮掺入量。将用过的饲料袋在缓冲液中机械捶打,以分离与饲料颗粒相关的(FPA)和与饲料颗粒结合的(FPB)细菌部分。应用于饲料的酶降低了中性洗涤纤维含量,并增加了大麦中的还原糖浓度,但对苜蓿干草没有影响。与对照相比,EF处理的瘤胃纤维素分解菌数量更多。EF处理的大麦干物质消失率高于对照,但苜蓿不受EF影响。处理EF在24小时和48小时时增加了15N向FPA和FPB部分的掺入。相比之下,AEF相对于对照降低了24小时的值;48小时时AEF和对照相似。注入酶(EI)不影响15N掺入。与对照相比,EF和EI增加了流出物中的木聚糖酶活性,但AEF没有。所有处理下FPA中的木聚糖酶活性在48小时时高于24小时;24小时和48小时时EF处理的木聚糖酶活性高于对照,但AEF和EI处理未改变。在饲喂前将酶应用于饲料比直接添加到人工瘤胃中更有效地提高瘤胃纤维分解活性。

相似文献

1
Effects of an exogenous enzyme preparation on microbial protein synthesis, enzyme activity and attachment to feed in the Rumen Simulation Technique (Rusitec).一种外源酶制剂对瘤胃模拟技术(Rusitec)中微生物蛋白质合成、酶活性及与饲料附着的影响。
Br J Nutr. 2001 Mar;85(3):325-32. doi: 10.1079/bjn2000277.
2
Effects of particle size of alfalfa-based dairy cow diets on chewing activity, ruminal fermentation, and milk production.以苜蓿为基础的奶牛日粮颗粒大小对咀嚼活动、瘤胃发酵及产奶性能的影响。
J Dairy Sci. 2003 Feb;86(2):630-43. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73641-8.
3
Effect of dietary or abomasal supplementation of exogenous polysaccharide-degrading enzymes on rumen fermentation and nutrient digestibility.日粮或真胃补充外源多糖降解酶对瘤胃发酵和养分消化率的影响。
J Anim Sci. 1998 Dec;76(12):3146-56. doi: 10.2527/1998.76123146x.
4
The proportion of the diet to which fibrolytic enzymes are added affects nutrient digestion by lactating dairy cows.添加纤维分解酶的日粮比例会影响泌乳奶牛的营养消化。
J Dairy Sci. 2002 Dec;85(12):3420-9. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74430-5.
5
Fibrolytic enzyme treatment of barley grain and source of forage in high-grain diets fed to growing cattle.在饲喂生长牛的高谷物日粮中,大麦籽粒的纤维分解酶处理及饲料来源
J Anim Sci. 1998 Nov;76(11):2912-20. doi: 10.2527/1998.76112912x.
6
Using a fibrolytic enzyme in barley-based diets containing wheat dried distillers grains with solubles: ruminal fermentation, digestibility, and growth performance of feedlot steers.在含有小麦干酒糟及其可溶物的大麦型日粮中使用纤维分解酶:育肥牛的瘤胃发酵、消化率及生长性能
J Anim Sci. 2014 Sep;92(9):3978-87. doi: 10.2527/jas.2014-7707. Epub 2014 Jul 1.
7
Effects of a proteolytic feed enzyme on intake, digestion, ruminal fermentation, and milk production.一种蛋白水解饲料酶对采食量、消化、瘤胃发酵和产奶量的影响。
J Dairy Sci. 2005 Jun;88(6):2140-53. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)72890-3.
8
Effects of particle size of alfalfa-based dairy cow diets on site and extent of digestion.以苜蓿为基础的奶牛日粮颗粒大小对消化部位及消化程度的影响。
J Dairy Sci. 2002 Aug;85(8):1958-68. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74272-0.
9
Influence of carbohydrate source on ruminal fermentation characteristics, performance, and microbial protein synthesis in dairy cows.碳水化合物来源对奶牛瘤胃发酵特性、生产性能及微生物蛋白质合成的影响。
J Dairy Sci. 2008 Jul;91(7):2726-35. doi: 10.3168/jds.2007-0809.
10
Effect of grain processing and silage on microbial protein synthesis and nutrient digestibility in beef cattle fed barley-based diets.谷物加工和青贮对以大麦为基础日粮的肉牛微生物蛋白合成及养分消化率的影响。
J Anim Sci. 2003 Apr;81(4):1057-67. doi: 10.2527/2003.8141057x.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of yeast and exogenous fibrolytic enzyme additives on lamb performance and feed efficiency.酵母和外源纤维分解酶添加剂对羔羊生产性能和饲料效率的影响。
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2024 Aug 7;56(7):235. doi: 10.1007/s11250-024-04095-8.
2
Effect of red osier dogwood extract on in vitro gas production, dry matter digestibility, and fermentation characteristics of forage-based diet or grain-based diet.红皮柳提取物对以草料为基础的日粮或谷物为基础的日粮的体外产气、干物质消化率及发酵特性的影响。
Heliyon. 2024 Mar 15;10(6):e27991. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27991. eCollection 2024 Mar 30.
3
Study on Dynamic Fermentation of Oat Silage Assisted by Exogenous Fibrolytic Enzymes.
外源纤维分解酶辅助燕麦青贮动态发酵的研究
Plants (Basel). 2023 Dec 19;13(1):6. doi: 10.3390/plants13010006.
4
Reduced-particle size wheat bran and endoxylanase supplementation in broiler feed affect arabinoxylan hydrolysis and fermentation with broiler age differently.在肉鸡饲料中添加粒径减小的麦麸和木聚糖酶对阿拉伯木聚糖水解及发酵的影响因肉鸡年龄而异。
Anim Nutr. 2022 Nov 23;12:308-320. doi: 10.1016/j.aninu.2022.11.003. eCollection 2023 Mar.
5
Intake, digestibility, growth performance and blood profile of rams fed sugarcane bagasse or rice husk treated with and effective microorganisms.用光合细菌和有效微生物处理的甘蔗渣或稻壳喂养的公羊的摄入量、消化率、生长性能和血液指标
Heliyon. 2022 Dec 1;8(12):e11958. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11958. eCollection 2022 Dec.
6
Study of the influence of exogenous fibrolytic enzyme additive on chemical composition, fermentation characteristics, and nutritional value of brewer's spent grain.外源纤维分解酶添加剂对啤酒糟化学成分、发酵特性及营养价值影响的研究
Food Sci Nutr. 2022 Jan 23;10(6):1707-1713. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.2743. eCollection 2022 Jun.
7
Feeding Date-Palm Leaves Ensiled with Fibrolytic Enzymes or Multi-Species Probiotics to Farafra Ewes: Intake, Digestibility, Ruminal Fermentation, Blood Chemistry, Milk Production and Milk Fatty Acid Profile.给法拉夫拉母羊饲喂添加纤维分解酶或多菌种益生菌青贮的椰枣叶:采食量、消化率、瘤胃发酵、血液生化指标、产奶量及乳脂肪酸组成
Animals (Basel). 2022 Apr 25;12(9):1107. doi: 10.3390/ani12091107.
8
Effect of Cellulase Enzyme Produced from on the Milk Production, Composition, Amino Acid, and Fatty Acid Profiles of Egyptian Buffaloes Fed a High-Forage Diet.由……产生的纤维素酶对采食高粗饲料日粮的埃及水牛产奶量、乳成分、氨基酸和脂肪酸谱的影响
Animals (Basel). 2021 Oct 27;11(11):3066. doi: 10.3390/ani11113066.
9
Effect of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) leaves on productive performance of growing lambs.枣椰树(Phoenix dactylifera L.)叶对生长羔羊生产性能的影响。
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2021 Jan 5;53(1):72. doi: 10.1007/s11250-020-02493-2.
10
Pretreatment of Rapeseed Meal Increases Its Recalcitrant Fiber Fermentation and Alters the Microbial Community in an Model of Swine Large Intestine.菜籽粕预处理可提高其难降解纤维的发酵能力,并改变猪大肠模型中的微生物群落。
Front Microbiol. 2020 Nov 19;11:588264. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.588264. eCollection 2020.