Vaisman M, Spina L D, Eksterman L F, dos Santos M J, Lima J S, Volpato N M, da Silva R L, de Brito A P, Noël F
Serviço de Endocrinologia (HUCFF-Hospital Universitário Clementino Fraga Filho), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Arzneimittelforschung. 2001;51(3):246-52. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1300031.
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the bioequivalence and therapeutic equivalence of the two most commonly prescribed L-thyroxine (monsodium L-thyroxine hydrate, CAS 25416-65-3) formulations in Brazil in patients treated for hypothyroidism. Twenty-four patients received 100 micrograms L-thyroxine daily of either Puran T4 (test) or the Brazilian reference formulation (reference) during 42 days, in a two-period crossover design. Serum samples obtained over a 24-h interval were analyzed for their total T4 concentration by a chemiluminescent immunoassay. Content and uniformity of the tablets and dissolution studies were also assessed according to USP 24 monograph using an isocratic HPLC-UV system and a rotating-paddle method. The mean pharmacokinetic parameters for total T4, expressed as geometric means (CV), for the test and reference were, respectively: Cmax (microgram/dl) 9.8 (14.3%) and 10.8 (14.9%); AUC0-24 h (microgram/dl.h) 206.8 (13.9%) and 230.4 (14.9%). Median values (90% CI) for Tmax (h) were 3 (2-3) and 2 (2-4) for the test and reference, respectively. 90% CI for ratios of LogCmax and LogAUC0-24 h were 86.6-94.9 and 86.3-93.4, respectively. Although the test exhibited values of Cmax and AUC0-24 h around 10% lower than the reference, these formulations must be considered bioequivalent since the 90% CI for both Cmax and AUC0-24 h mean ratio were within the 80-125% interval as proposed by the US Food and Drug Administration and the Brazilian legislation. TSH dosages within the normal range further support therapeutic equivalence between the two formulations. Dissolution data were roughly in agreement with in vivo results since both formulations comply with the USP dissolution criteria although the test tablets had a slower dissolution rate than the reference tablets. As a conclusion, the two oral formulations of L-thyroxine are both bioequivalent and therapeutically equivalent although presenting a small difference in their extent of absorption. Noteworthy, the dissolution profiles of the tablets correlate well with their bioavailability in the present experimental conditions.
本研究的目的是评估巴西两种最常用的左旋甲状腺素(L-甲状腺素钠水合物,CAS 25416-65-3)制剂在甲状腺功能减退症患者中的生物等效性和治疗等效性。24名患者在42天内采用两周期交叉设计,每日接受100微克左旋甲状腺素,分别为Puran T4(试验制剂)或巴西参比制剂。通过化学发光免疫分析法分析24小时间隔内采集的血清样本的总T4浓度。还根据美国药典第24版专论,使用等度HPLC-UV系统和转桨法评估了片剂的含量、均匀度和溶出度研究。试验制剂和参比制剂的总T4平均药代动力学参数,以几何均值(CV)表示,分别为:Cmax(微克/分升)9.8(14.3%)和10.8(14.9%);AUC0-24 h(微克/分升·小时)206.8(13.9%)和230.4(14.9%)。试验制剂和参比制剂的Tmax(小时)中位数(90%CI)分别为3(2-3)和2(2-4)。LogCmax和LogAUC0-24 h比值的90%CI分别为86.6-94.9和86.3-93.4。尽管试验制剂的Cmax和AUC0-24 h值比参比制剂低约10%,但由于Cmax和AUC0-24 h平均比值的90%CI均在80-125%区间内(这是美国食品药品监督管理局和巴西法规所规定的),因此这两种制剂必须被视为生物等效。正常范围内的促甲状腺激素剂量进一步支持了两种制剂之间的治疗等效性。溶出度数据与体内结果大致一致,因为两种制剂均符合美国药典溶出度标准,尽管试验片剂的溶出速率比参比片剂慢。结论是,两种左旋甲状腺素口服制剂虽然在吸收程度上存在微小差异,但均具有生物等效性和治疗等效性。值得注意的是,在本实验条件下,片剂的溶出曲线与其生物利用度具有良好的相关性。