Cuadrado Antonio, Rodríguez Gascón Alicia, Hernández Rose María, Castilla Ana María, de la Maza Ane, López de Ocáriz Alicia, Calvo Begoña, Pedraz José Luis
Clinical Trial Unit, Txagorritxu Hospital, Vitoria, Spain.
Arzneimittelforschung. 2002;52(5):371-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1299900.
A randomised, cross-over, open study of bioequivalence between two different atenolol (CAS 29122-68-7) tablet formulations is presented. An in vitro comparative study between the two formulations was also performed. Both products meet the USP 23 (United States Pharmacopea) specification. The values of similarity factor (f2) and difference factor (f1) obtained ensure sameness or equivalence of the two dissolution curves. Twenty-four healthy volunteers (male/female) participated in the bioequivalence study. Each treatment was given as a single 100-mg tablet following an overnight fast. Atenolol concentrations in plasma were determined up to 30 h after treatment by HPLC. The pharmacokinetic parameters AUC0-infinity, Cmax and Cmax/AUC0-infinity were tested for bioequivalence after logarithmic transformation of data and ratios of tmax were evaluated nonparametrically. The parametric analysis revealed the following test/reference ratios and their 90% confidence intervals (90% CI): 1.06 (0.99-1.13) for AUC, 1.07 (0.97-1.18) for Cmax, and 0.99 (0.94-1.07) for Cmax/AUC0-infinity. The 90% CI for tmax was 0.91-1.23. All parameters showed bioequivalence between both formulations. A discrete fall in both systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure was observed after the drug administration. The fall extent (approximately 11 mmHg in supine position) and the time course of both parameters after the drug administration was similar for both formulations. Minimal values for SBP and DBP were achieved at 6 h after the drug administration for both formulations. Heart rates were also reduced after the administration of both formulations of atenolol in a similar extent (12 b.p.m.) and following a similar time profile (i.e. maximal reductions were observed between 1 and 3 h after the drug administration). It can be concluded that both formulations are equivalent in vitro and in vivo.
本文介绍了两种不同阿替洛尔(CAS 29122-68-7)片剂制剂生物等效性的随机、交叉、开放研究。同时还对两种制剂进行了体外比较研究。两种产品均符合美国药典第23版(USP 23)的规范。所获得的相似性因子(f2)和差异因子(f1)值确保了两条溶出曲线的一致性或等效性。24名健康志愿者(男性/女性)参与了生物等效性研究。在禁食过夜后,每种治疗均给予一片100毫克的片剂。通过高效液相色谱法(HPLC)测定治疗后长达30小时的血浆中阿替洛尔浓度。对数据进行对数转换后,测试药代动力学参数AUC0-无穷大、Cmax和Cmax/AUC0-无穷大的生物等效性,并对tmax的比值进行非参数评估。参数分析得出以下测试/参比制剂的比值及其90%置信区间(90%CI):AUC为1.06(0.99-1.13),Cmax为1.07(0.97-1.18),Cmax/AUC0-无穷大为0.99(0.94-1.07)。tmax的90%CI为0.91-1.23。所有参数均显示两种制剂具有生物等效性。给药后观察到收缩压(SBP)和舒张压(DBP)均有明显下降。两种制剂给药后血压下降程度(仰卧位约11 mmHg)和这两个参数的时间进程相似。两种制剂在给药后6小时均达到SBP和DBP的最小值。两种阿替洛尔制剂给药后心率也有相似程度的降低(12次/分钟),且时间变化趋势相似(即给药后1至3小时心率降低幅度最大)。可以得出结论,两种制剂在体外和体内均等效。