Suppr超能文献

口服抗糖尿病药物的体内生物等效性:吡格列酮片

In vivo bioequivalence of oral antidiabetic agents: pioglitazone tablets.

作者信息

Wong Hong, Ozalp Yildiz, Lainesse Audrey, Alpan Recep Serdar

机构信息

SFBC Anapharm, Sainte-Foy, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

Arzneimittelforschung. 2004 Sep;54(9A):618-24. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1297059.

Abstract

The study was designed to evaluate the bioequivalence of two pioglitazone (CAS 112529-15-4) formulations. The trial was performed in 26 healthy male volunteers with the aim of comparing a new generic product (tablets containing 30 mg pioglit-azone hydrochloride, test) with the originator product (reference). The trial was performed according to an open, crossover design in one study centre. In each of the two study periods (separated by a wash-out of 14 days) a single oral dose of 30 mg (test or reference) formulation was administered. Blood samples were taken up to 120 h post dose, the plasma was separated and the concentrations of pioglitazone and its principal active metabolite hydroxypioglitazone were determined by LC-MS-MS method. AUC0-inf, AUC0-t, Cmax, and Tmax were calculated for both formulations. The mean Cmax of pioglitazone ranged between 1.01 microg/mL and 1.05 microg/mL, while the mean AUC0-inf and AUC0-t ranged between 10.89 microg x h/mL and 10.98 microg x h/mL as well as between 10.56 microg x h/mL and 10.62 microg x h/mL for the test and reference formulations, respectively. The median Tmax for the test tablets was 1.50 h and for the reference was 1.75 h. The ratios test/reference formulation for AUC0-inf, AUC0-t and Cmax were 99.70%, 100.13% and 99.17%, respectively. Furthermore, the 90% geometric confidence intervals of the mean ratio of In-transformed AUC0-inf were narrow and symmetrical around 100%, i.e. 90.59% to 109.72%, for AUC0-t, 90.69% to 110.55%, whereas for Cmax they were 87.52% to 112.37%. As in the case of pioglitazone, mean values of the principal bioequivalence parameters of hydroxypioglitazone did not differ significantly after administration of the test and reference formulations. In the light of the present study it can be concluded that the two evaluated pioglitazone formulations, i.e. test formulation of pioglitazone hydrochloride and reference formulation, are bioequivalent in terms of the rate and extent of absorption.

摘要

本研究旨在评估两种吡格列酮(CAS 112529-15-4)制剂的生物等效性。该试验在26名健康男性志愿者中进行,目的是比较一种新的仿制药(含30 mg盐酸吡格列酮的片剂,试验品)与原研产品(参比品)。试验在一个研究中心按照开放、交叉设计进行。在两个研究周期的每个周期(间隔14天的洗脱期),均给予单次口服剂量30 mg(试验品或参比品)制剂。给药后至120小时采集血样,分离血浆,采用液相色谱-质谱联用(LC-MS-MS)法测定吡格列酮及其主要活性代谢物羟基吡格列酮的浓度。计算两种制剂的AUC0-inf、AUC0-t、Cmax和Tmax。吡格列酮的平均Cmax在1.01μg/mL至1.05μg/mL之间,试验制剂和参比制剂的平均AUC0-inf和AUC0-t分别在10.89μg·h/mL至10.98μg·h/mL以及10.56μg·h/mL至10.62μg·h/mL之间。试验片剂的中位Tmax为1.50小时,参比片剂为1.75小时。试验制剂与参比制剂的AUC0-inf、AUC0-t和Cmax的比值分别为99.70%、100.13%和99.17%。此外,In转换后的AUC0-inf平均比值的90%几何置信区间较窄且关于100%对称,AUC0-t为90.59%至109.72%,Cmax为87.52%至112.37%。与吡格列酮的情况一样,给予试验制剂和参比制剂后,羟基吡格列酮主要生物等效性参数的平均值无显著差异。根据本研究可以得出结论,所评估的两种吡格列酮制剂,即盐酸吡格列酮试验制剂和参比制剂,在吸收速率和程度方面具有生物等效性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验