al-Rakaf H, Bello L L, Turkustani A, Adenubi J O
Department of Preventive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Saudi Arabia.
Int J Paediatr Dent. 2001 Jan;11(1):33-40. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-263x.2001.00237.x.
To compare the effects of 3 different doses of intra-nasal midazolam in the conscious sedation of young paediatric dental patients and to compare the effectiveness of the sedation in the fasting and non-fasting child.
Double blind random controlled trial.
Thirty-eight uncooperative young children aged 2-5 years (mean age 4.02 years) were randomly assigned to one of 3 groups. The groups and the doses of midazolam administered intra-nasally were A: 0.3 mg/kg, B: 0.4 mg/kg, and C: 0.5 mg/kg body weight. Each child in each group had two visits for restorative treatment: one without food (fasting) and the other with soft drink and light food (non-fasting) before treatment. Child behaviour and sedative effects were evaluated using the scoring system of Houpt. The vital signs were monitored continuously using a pulse oximeter and Dinamap machine.
There was rapid onset of sedation with the maximal effect between 8 and 15 minutes. This sedation lasted for 25-40 minutes in Groups A and B and for 60 minutes in Group C. Conscious sedation and dental treatment were achieved in 79%, 96% and 100% of the children in Groups A, B and C, respectively. Consistently higher Houpt scores were seen in Groups B and C, with statistically significant differences between Groups A and C, and B and C (Tukey's range test, P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the general behaviour of the child, the onset and the duration of sedation between the fasting and the non-fasting child (nonparametric ANOVA P > 0.05). All the vital signs were within normal physiological limits and there were no significant adverse effects either with or without fasting.
All 3 doses of intranasal midazolam were effective in modifying the behaviour of the uncooperative child patient to accept dental treatment. This was irrespective of fasting.
比较3种不同剂量的鼻内咪达唑仑对小儿牙科患者清醒镇静的效果,并比较禁食和非禁食儿童镇静的有效性。
双盲随机对照试验。
38名2至5岁(平均年龄4.02岁)不合作的幼儿被随机分为3组。鼻内给予咪达唑仑的组别和剂量分别为:A组:0.3mg/kg,B组:0.4mg/kg,C组:0.5mg/kg体重。每组中的每个孩子都有两次进行修复治疗的就诊:一次在治疗前未进食(禁食),另一次在治疗前饮用了软饮料并食用了清淡食物(非禁食)。使用Houpt评分系统评估儿童行为和镇静效果。使用脉搏血氧仪和Dinamap机器持续监测生命体征。
镇静起效迅速,最大效果出现在8至15分钟之间。A组和B组的这种镇静持续25至40分钟,C组持续60分钟。A组、B组和C组分别有79%、96%和100%的儿童实现了清醒镇静和牙科治疗。B组和C组的Houpt评分始终较高,A组与C组以及B组与C组之间存在统计学显著差异(Tukey范围检验,P<0.05)。禁食和非禁食儿童在一般行为、镇静的起效和持续时间方面没有显著差异(非参数方差分析P>0.05)。所有生命体征均在正常生理范围内,无论禁食与否均无显著不良反应。
所有3种剂量的鼻内咪达唑仑均可有效改变不合作儿童患者的行为以接受牙科治疗。这与禁食与否无关。