Suppr超能文献

鼻内咪达唑仑、氯胺酮及其组合用于不合作小儿牙科患者镇静的比较评估:一项三盲随机交叉试验。

A comparative evaluation of intranasal midazolam, ketamine and their combination for sedation of young uncooperative pediatric dental patients: a triple blind randomized crossover trial.

作者信息

Bahetwar S K, Pandey R K, Saksena A K, Chandra Girish

机构信息

Department of Pedodontics with Preventive Dentistry, Swargiya Dadasaheb Kalmegh Smruti Dental College and Hospital, Hingna, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.

出版信息

J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2011 Summer;35(4):415-20. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.35.4.l43h3354705u2574.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of intranasal (IN) administration of midazolam (M), ketamine (K) and their combination (MK) to produce moderate sedation in young, uncooperative pediatric dental patients.

STUDY DESIGN

In this three stage crossover trial forty five uncooperative ASA type-1 children, who required dental treatment, were randomly assigned to receive one of the three drugs/combination by IN route during three subsequent visits. The efficacy and safety of the agents were assessed by overall success rate and by monitoring of vital signs, respectively.

RESULTS

The onset of sedation was rapid with K as compared to M and MK. The difference was statistically significant (P < 0.01) between K and M. The overall success rate was 89% with K, MK was 84% and 69% with M. The difference between the overall success rates of K and M was statistically significant (P < 0.01). Vital signs were within physiological limits and there were no significant adverse effects with any medication.

CONCLUSIONS

M, K and MK are safe and effective by IN route to produce moderate sedation for providing dental care to pediatric dental patients who have been otherwise indicated for treatment under general anesthesia.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估和比较鼻内(IN)给予咪达唑仑(M)、氯胺酮(K)及其组合(MK),对年轻、不合作的儿童牙科患者进行中度镇静的疗效和安全性。

研究设计

在这项三阶段交叉试验中,45名需要牙科治疗的不合作的ASA 1级儿童在随后的三次就诊期间被随机分配通过鼻内途径接受三种药物/组合中的一种。分别通过总体成功率和生命体征监测来评估药物的疗效和安全性。

结果

与M和MK相比,K的镇静起效迅速。K和M之间的差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.01)。K的总体成功率为89%,MK为84%,M为69%。K和M的总体成功率之间的差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.01)。生命体征在生理范围内,任何药物均未产生明显不良反应。

结论

对于已被指明需在全身麻醉下进行治疗的儿童牙科患者,M、K和MK通过鼻内途径进行中度镇静以提供牙科护理是安全有效的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验