Bahetwar S K, Pandey R K, Saksena A K, Chandra Girish
Department of Pedodontics with Preventive Dentistry, Swargiya Dadasaheb Kalmegh Smruti Dental College and Hospital, Hingna, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2011 Summer;35(4):415-20. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.35.4.l43h3354705u2574.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of intranasal (IN) administration of midazolam (M), ketamine (K) and their combination (MK) to produce moderate sedation in young, uncooperative pediatric dental patients.
In this three stage crossover trial forty five uncooperative ASA type-1 children, who required dental treatment, were randomly assigned to receive one of the three drugs/combination by IN route during three subsequent visits. The efficacy and safety of the agents were assessed by overall success rate and by monitoring of vital signs, respectively.
The onset of sedation was rapid with K as compared to M and MK. The difference was statistically significant (P < 0.01) between K and M. The overall success rate was 89% with K, MK was 84% and 69% with M. The difference between the overall success rates of K and M was statistically significant (P < 0.01). Vital signs were within physiological limits and there were no significant adverse effects with any medication.
M, K and MK are safe and effective by IN route to produce moderate sedation for providing dental care to pediatric dental patients who have been otherwise indicated for treatment under general anesthesia.
本研究旨在评估和比较鼻内(IN)给予咪达唑仑(M)、氯胺酮(K)及其组合(MK),对年轻、不合作的儿童牙科患者进行中度镇静的疗效和安全性。
在这项三阶段交叉试验中,45名需要牙科治疗的不合作的ASA 1级儿童在随后的三次就诊期间被随机分配通过鼻内途径接受三种药物/组合中的一种。分别通过总体成功率和生命体征监测来评估药物的疗效和安全性。
与M和MK相比,K的镇静起效迅速。K和M之间的差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.01)。K的总体成功率为89%,MK为84%,M为69%。K和M的总体成功率之间的差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.01)。生命体征在生理范围内,任何药物均未产生明显不良反应。
对于已被指明需在全身麻醉下进行治疗的儿童牙科患者,M、K和MK通过鼻内途径进行中度镇静以提供牙科护理是安全有效的。