• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用潜在语义结构索引(LaSSI)进行化学相似性搜索并与TOPOSIM进行比较。

Chemical similarity searches using latent semantic structural indexing (LaSSI) and comparison to TOPOSIM.

作者信息

Hull R D, Fluder E M, Singh S B, Nachbar R B, Kearsley S K, Sheridan R P

机构信息

Department of Molecular Systems, RY50S-100, Merck Research Laboratories, P.O. Box 2000, Rahway, New Jersey 07065, USA.

出版信息

J Med Chem. 2001 Apr 12;44(8):1185-91. doi: 10.1021/jm000392k.

DOI:10.1021/jm000392k
PMID:11312918
Abstract

Similarity searches based on chemical descriptors have proven extremely useful in aiding large-scale drug screening. Here we present results of similarity searching using Latent Semantic Structure Indexing (LaSSI). LaSSI uses a singular value decomposition on chemical descriptors to project molecules into a k-dimensional descriptor space, where k is the number of retained singular values. The effect of the projection is that certain descriptors are emphasized over others and some descriptors may count as partially equivalent to others. We compare LaSSI searches to searches done with TOPOSIM, our standard in-house method, which uses the Dice similarity definition. Standard descriptor-based methods such as TOPOSIM count all descriptors equally and treat all descriptors as independent. For this work we use atom pairs and topological torsions as examples of chemical descriptors. Using objective criteria to determine how effective one similarity method is versus another in selecting active compounds from a large database, we find for a series of 16 drug-like probes that LaSSI is as good as or better than TOPOSIM in selecting active compounds from the MDDR database, if the user is allowed to treat k as an adjustable parameter. Typically, LaSSI selects very different sets of actives than does TOPOSIM, so it can find classes of actives that TOPOSIM would miss.

摘要

基于化学描述符的相似性搜索在大规模药物筛选中已被证明非常有用。在此,我们展示了使用潜在语义结构索引(LaSSI)进行相似性搜索的结果。LaSSI对化学描述符进行奇异值分解,将分子投影到k维描述符空间,其中k是保留的奇异值数量。投影的效果是某些描述符比其他描述符更受强调,并且一些描述符可能被视为部分等同于其他描述符。我们将LaSSI搜索与使用我们内部标准方法TOPOSIM进行的搜索进行比较,TOPOSIM使用Dice相似性定义。基于标准描述符的方法(如TOPOSIM)平等地计算所有描述符,并将所有描述符视为独立的。在这项工作中,我们使用原子对和拓扑扭转作为化学描述符的示例。使用客观标准来确定一种相似性方法相对于另一种在从大型数据库中选择活性化合物方面的有效性,我们发现对于一系列16种类药物探针,如果允许用户将k视为可调参数,那么在从MDDR数据库中选择活性化合物方面,LaSSI与TOPOSIM一样好或更好。通常,LaSSI选择的活性化合物集与TOPOSIM非常不同,因此它可以找到TOPOSIM会错过的活性化合物类别。

相似文献

1
Chemical similarity searches using latent semantic structural indexing (LaSSI) and comparison to TOPOSIM.使用潜在语义结构索引(LaSSI)进行化学相似性搜索并与TOPOSIM进行比较。
J Med Chem. 2001 Apr 12;44(8):1185-91. doi: 10.1021/jm000392k.
2
Mining the chemical quarry with joint chemical probes: an application of latent semantic structure indexing (LaSSI) and TOPOSIM (Dice) to chemical database mining.利用联合化学探针挖掘化学宝库:潜在语义结构索引(LaSSI)和TOPOSIM(Dice)在化学数据库挖掘中的应用
J Med Chem. 2001 May 10;44(10):1564-75. doi: 10.1021/jm000398+.
3
Latent semantic structure indexing (LaSSI) for defining chemical similarity.用于定义化学相似性的潜在语义结构索引(LaSSI)。
J Med Chem. 2001 Apr 12;44(8):1177-84. doi: 10.1021/jm000393c.
4
Text Influenced Molecular Indexing (TIMI): a literature database mining approach that handles text and chemistry.文本影响分子索引(TIMI):一种处理文本和化学信息的文献数据库挖掘方法。
J Chem Inf Comput Sci. 2003 May-Jun;43(3):743-52. doi: 10.1021/ci025587a.
5
Protocols for bridging the peptide to nonpeptide gap in topological similarity searches.在拓扑相似性搜索中连接肽与非肽差距的方案。
J Chem Inf Comput Sci. 2001 Sep-Oct;41(5):1395-406. doi: 10.1021/ci0100144.
6
Determination and mapping of activity-specific descriptor value ranges for the identification of active compounds.用于鉴定活性化合物的活性特异性描述符值范围的确定与映射。
J Med Chem. 2006 Apr 6;49(7):2284-93. doi: 10.1021/jm051110p.
7
Selecting optimally diverse compounds from structure databases: a validation study of two-dimensional and three-dimensional molecular descriptors.从结构数据库中选择最优多样化的化合物:二维和三维分子描述符的验证研究
J Med Chem. 1997 Apr 11;40(8):1219-29. doi: 10.1021/jm960352+.
8
How similar are similarity searching methods? A principal component analysis of molecular descriptor space.相似性搜索方法的相似程度如何?分子描述符空间的主成分分析。
J Chem Inf Model. 2009 Jan;49(1):108-19. doi: 10.1021/ci800249s.
9
Bridging chemical and biological space: "target fishing" using 2D and 3D molecular descriptors.连接化学与生物空间:使用二维和三维分子描述符进行“靶点垂钓”
J Med Chem. 2006 Nov 16;49(23):6802-10. doi: 10.1021/jm060902w.
10
Performance of similarity measures in 2D fragment-based similarity searching: comparison of structural descriptors and similarity coefficients.二维基于片段的相似性搜索中相似性度量的性能:结构描述符和相似性系数的比较
J Chem Inf Comput Sci. 2002 Nov-Dec;42(6):1407-14. doi: 10.1021/ci025531g.

引用本文的文献

1
Quantifying Mineral-Ligand Structural Similarities: Bridging the Geological World of Minerals with the Biological World of Enzymes.量化矿物-配体结构相似性:架起矿物地质世界与酶生物世界之间的桥梁。
Life (Basel). 2020 Dec 10;10(12):338. doi: 10.3390/life10120338.