• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Patient autonomy in emergency medicine.

作者信息

Naess A C, Foerde R, Steen P A

机构信息

Centre for Medical Ethics, School of Medicine, University of Oslo, Pb. 1130 Blindern, N-0317 Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Med Health Care Philos. 2001;4(1):71-7. doi: 10.1023/a:1009982710625.

DOI:10.1023/a:1009982710625
PMID:11315422
Abstract

Theoretical models for patient-physician communication in clinical practice are frequently described in the literature. Respecting patient autonomy is an ethical problem the physician faces in a medical emergency situation. No theoretical physician-patient model seems to be ideal for solving the communication problem in clinical practice. Theoretical models can at best give guidance to behavior and judgement in emergency situations. In this article the premises of autonomous treatment decisions are discussed. Based on a case-report we discuss different genuine efforts the physician can do to uncover treatment refusal and respect patient autonomy in an emergency situation. Autonomy requires competence and in emergency medicine time does not allow intimate exploration of patient competence and reasons for treatment refusal. We find that the physician must base her decision on a firm theoretical base combined with a practical and realistic view of the patient's situation on a case to case basis.

摘要

相似文献

1
Patient autonomy in emergency medicine.
Med Health Care Philos. 2001;4(1):71-7. doi: 10.1023/a:1009982710625.
2
Patients without choices: the ethics of decision-making in emergency medicine.没有选择的患者:急诊医学中的决策伦理
J Emerg Med. 1985;3(2):149-56. doi: 10.1016/0736-4679(85)90048-4.
3
Introduction to The Silent World of Doctor and Patient.《医生与患者的沉默世界》引言
West New Engl Law Rev. 1987;9(1):1-19.
4
Respecting autonomy by respecting persons: taking the patient's story seriously.通过尊重人来尊重自主性:认真对待患者的经历。
Humane Med. 1990 Spring;6(2):107-12.
5
Refusal of care: the physician-patient relationship and decisionmaking capacity.拒绝治疗:医患关系与决策能力
Ann Emerg Med. 2007 Oct;50(4):456-61. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.04.016. Epub 2007 Jun 20.
6
Liberal rationalism and medical decision-making.自由主义理性主义与医学决策
Bioethics. 1997 Apr;11(2):115-29. doi: 10.1111/1467-8519.00049.
7
Physician-patient encounters "on a darkling plain.医患会面“在一片昏暗的平原上” 。 (此句单独看表意不太完整,可能在具体语境中有更确切含义)
West New Engl Law Rev. 1987;9(1):207-26.
8
Self-determination and moral responsibility.
West New Engl Law Rev. 1987;9(1):53-65.
9
Ethics and communication with the terminally ill.临终关怀中的伦理与沟通。
Health Commun. 1995;7(3):267-81. doi: 10.1207/s15327027hc0703_5.
10
Tell me what's wrong with me: a discourse analysis approach to the concept of patient autonomy.告诉我我怎么了:一种关于患者自主性概念的话语分析方法。
J Med Ethics. 1998 Dec;24(6):394-400. doi: 10.1136/jme.24.6.394.

引用本文的文献

1
Identifying High-Priority Ethical Challenges for Precision Emergency Medicine: Nominal Group Study.确定精准急诊医学的高度优先伦理挑战:名义群体研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Feb 6;9:e68371. doi: 10.2196/68371.
2
Empathy and Occupational Health and Well-Being in Ecuadorian Physicians Working with COVID-19 Patients: A Mixed-Method Study.厄瓜多尔治疗新冠肺炎患者的医生的同理心与职业健康和幸福感:一项混合方法研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Apr 19;11(8):1177. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11081177.
3
Which communication technology is effective for promoting reproductive health? Television, radio, and mobile phones in sub-Saharan Africa.

本文引用的文献

1
Physician recommendations and patient autonomy: finding a balance between physician power and patient choice.医生的建议与患者自主权:在医生权力与患者选择之间寻求平衡。
Ann Intern Med. 1996 Nov 1;125(9):763-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-125-9-199611010-00010.
2
Understanding patients' decisions. Cognitive and emotional perspectives.理解患者的决策:认知与情感视角
JAMA. 1993 Jul 7;270(1):72-6.
3
Advance directives. Stability of patients' treatment choices.预立医疗指示。患者治疗选择的稳定性。
在撒哈拉以南非洲地区,哪种传播技术对促进生殖健康有效?电视、广播和移动电话。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 17;17(8):e0272501. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272501. eCollection 2022.
4
Challenges of Obtaining Informed Consent in Emergency Ward: A Qualitative Study in One Iranian Hospital.急诊病房获取知情同意书的挑战:伊朗一家医院的定性研究
Open Nurs J. 2017 Dec 29;11:263-276. doi: 10.2174/1874434601711010263. eCollection 2017.
5
The impact of dental phobia on patient consent.牙科恐惧症对患者同意的影响。
Br Dent J. 2015 Aug 28;219(4):183-5. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2015.648.
6
Decision-making capacity should not be decisive in emergencies.在紧急情况下,决策能力不应起决定性作用。
Med Health Care Philos. 2014 May;17(2):229-38. doi: 10.1007/s11019-013-9534-9.
7
The admissibility of research in emergency medicine.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2007 Sep;13(3):315-32. doi: 10.1007/s11948-007-9024-7.
8
Ethical principles--emergency medicine.伦理原则——急诊医学
Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2006 Aug;24(3):513-45. doi: 10.1016/j.emc.2006.05.007.
9
The impact of factitious disorder on the physician-patient relationship. An epistemological model.
Med Health Care Philos. 2002;5(3):253-61. doi: 10.1023/a:1021106022330.
Arch Intern Med. 1994 Jan 24;154(2):209-17. doi: 10.1001/archinte.154.2.209.
4
Myth of substituted judgment. Surrogate decision making regarding life support is unreliable.替代判断的神话。关于维持生命治疗的替代决策是不可靠的。
Arch Intern Med. 1994 Jan 10;154(1):90-6. doi: 10.1001/archinte.154.1.90.
5
Do patients' evaluations of a future health state change when they actually enter that state?
Med Care. 1993 Nov;31(11):1002-12. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199311000-00003.
6
Attitudes toward assisted suicide and euthanasia among physicians in Washington State.华盛顿州医生对协助自杀和安乐死的态度。
N Engl J Med. 1994 Jul 14;331(2):89-94. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199407143310206.
7
How age, outcome severity, and scale influence general medicine clinic patients' interpretations of verbal probability terms.年龄、结果严重程度和量表如何影响普通内科门诊患者对口头概率术语的理解。
J Gen Intern Med. 1994 May;9(5):268-71. doi: 10.1007/BF02599654.
8
Deciding about cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The contributions of decision analysis.
Arch Intern Med. 1995 Mar 13;155(5):513-21.
9
Discussions about the use of life-sustaining treatments: a literature review of physicians' and patients' attitudes and practices. End of Life Study Group.关于维持生命治疗使用情况的讨论:医生与患者态度及做法的文献综述。临终研究小组。
J Clin Ethics. 1994 Fall;5(3):195-203.
10
The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice.决策的框架与选择的心理学。
Science. 1981 Jan 30;211(4481):453-8. doi: 10.1126/science.7455683.