• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

顺势疗法颠茄30CH对健康志愿者的影响——一项随机双盲实验。

The effects of homeopathic belladonna 30CH in healthy volunteers -- a randomized, double-blind experiment.

作者信息

Walach H, Köster H, Hennig T, Haag G

机构信息

Department of Environmental Medicine and Hygiene, University Hospital, Freiburg, Germany.

出版信息

J Psychosom Res. 2001 Mar;50(3):155-60. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3999(00)00224-5.

DOI:10.1016/s0022-3999(00)00224-5
PMID:11316508
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The practice of homeopathy rests on symptoms, which have been produced by medicinal substances in healthy volunteers, often applied at ultramolecular dilutions. It is unknown whether these symptom patterns are due to specific effects or chance fluctuation.

METHODS

We tested the hypothesis that a homeopathic substance can bring about symptoms different from observation and placebo in a double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover design with baseline observation.

RESULTS

87 out of 118 healthy volunteers took both placebo and homeopathic belladonna 30CH in random sequence, after a 2-week observation period, and finished the 8-week trial. Apart from an insignificant tendency for subjects to report more symptoms with belladonna (mean number: 27.34), as compared to observation (24.26) or placebo (24.17), there was no indication that subjects reacted differently to homeopathy than to placebo or during baseline.

CONCLUSION

There is no indication that belladonna 30CH produces symptoms different from placebo or from no intervention. Symptoms of a homeopathic pathogenetic trial (HPT) are most likely chance fluctuations.

摘要

目的

顺势疗法基于健康志愿者服用药物(通常为超分子稀释剂)后产生的症状。目前尚不清楚这些症状模式是由于特定效应还是随机波动所致。

方法

我们采用双盲、安慰剂对照交叉设计并进行基线观察,检验顺势疗法药物能否产生与观察和安慰剂不同的症状这一假设。

结果

118名健康志愿者中有87人在经过2周观察期后,随机先后服用了安慰剂和顺势疗法的30CH颠茄制剂,并完成了为期8周的试验。与观察期(平均24.26个)或安慰剂组(平均24.17个)相比,受试者报告服用颠茄制剂后出现更多症状的倾向并不显著,没有迹象表明受试者对顺势疗法的反应与对安慰剂或基线期的反应不同。

结论

没有迹象表明30CH颠茄制剂产生的症状与安慰剂或无干预情况不同。顺势疗法致病试验(HPT)的症状很可能是随机波动。

相似文献

1
The effects of homeopathic belladonna 30CH in healthy volunteers -- a randomized, double-blind experiment.顺势疗法颠茄30CH对健康志愿者的影响——一项随机双盲实验。
J Psychosom Res. 2001 Mar;50(3):155-60. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3999(00)00224-5.
2
Ultramolecular homeopathy has no observable clinical effects. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled proving trial of Belladonna 30C.超分子顺势疗法没有可观察到的临床效果。一项关于颠茄30C的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照验证试验。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2003 Nov;56(5):562-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2003.01900.x.
3
Homeopathic pathogenetic trials produce specific symptoms different from placebo.顺势疗法的致病试验产生与安慰剂不同的特定症状。
Forsch Komplementmed. 2009 Apr;16(2):105-10. doi: 10.1159/000209386. Epub 2009 Apr 9.
4
Homeopathic proving symptoms: result of a local, non-local, or placebo process? A blinded, placebo-controlled pilot study.顺势疗法验证症状:局部、非局部或安慰剂效应的结果?一项双盲、安慰剂对照的试点研究。
Homeopathy. 2004 Oct;93(4):179-85. doi: 10.1016/j.homp.2004.07.006.
5
A double-blind, randomized, homeopathic pathogenetic trial with healthy persons: comparing two high potencies.一项针对健康人的双盲、随机顺势疗法致病试验:比较两种高药力制剂。
Forsch Komplementarmed Klass Naturheilkd. 2004 Oct;11(5):274-80. doi: 10.1159/000082120.
6
Do Homeopathic Pathogenetic Trials generate recognisable and reproducible symptom pictures?: Results from a pilot pathogenetic trial of Ozone 30c.顺势疗法致病试验能否产生可识别且可重复的症状图谱?:臭氧30c致病试验的初步结果。
Homeopathy. 2014 Apr;103(2):108-12. doi: 10.1016/j.homp.2013.12.001.
7
Can homeopaths detect homeopathic medicines? A pilot study for a randomised, double-blind, placebo controlled investigation of the proving hypothesis.顺势疗法从业者能检测出顺势疗法药物吗?一项关于验证假设的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究的初步试验。
Br Homeopath J. 2001 Jul;90(3):126-30. doi: 10.1054/homp.1999.0475.
8
Test of a homeopathic dilution of Aconitum napellus. A clinical, randomized, double-blind, controlled crossover study in healthy volunteers.
Forsch Komplementmed. 2009 Jun;16(3):168-73. doi: 10.1159/000219316. Epub 2009 Jun 5.
9
Efficacy of homeopathic treatment of skin reactions during radiotherapy for breast cancer: a randomised, double-blind clinical trial.
Br Homeopath J. 2000 Jan;89(1):8-12. doi: 10.1054/homp.1999.0328.
10
Homeopathy--between tradition and modern science: remedies as carriers of significance.顺势疗法——介于传统与现代科学之间:药物作为意义的载体。
Homeopathy. 2013 Apr;102(2):114-22. doi: 10.1016/j.homp.2013.01.003.

引用本文的文献

1
An exploration of the relationship between placebo and homeopathy and the implications for clinical trial design.安慰剂与顺势疗法之间的关系探索及其对临床试验设计的启示。
JRSM Short Rep. 2013 Jul 30;4(9):2042533313490927. doi: 10.1177/2042533313490927.
2
Homeopathic drug proving of Okoubaka aubrevillei: a randomised placebo-controlled trial.奥库巴卡·奥布雷维利顺势疗法药物验证:一项随机安慰剂对照试验。
Trials. 2013 Apr 5;14:96. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-96.
3
Ultramolecular homeopathy has no observable clinical effects. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled proving trial of Belladonna 30C.
超分子顺势疗法没有可观察到的临床效果。一项关于颠茄30C的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照验证试验。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2003 Nov;56(5):562-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2003.01900.x.