Prisant L M
Hypertension Unit, Section of Cardiology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Georgia 30912-3105, USA.
Am J Ther. 2000 May;7(3):177-84. doi: 10.1097/00045391-200007030-00005.
This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study evaluated the efficacy and safety of single daily dose diltiazem extended-release (XR) and indapamide, given alone and combined, in 255 male and 170 female patients with mild to moderate hypertension. Blood pressure was assessed both manually in the office and by 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) techniques. Between-treatment efficacy comparisons were based on ABPM plots and changes from baseline in supine systolic (SuSBP) and diastolic (SuDBP) blood pressure after 6 weeks of double-blind treatment. Periodic 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECG), clinical laboratory tests, and physical examinations were used to assess safety. Both diltiazem XR 180, 240, and 360 mg and indapamide 2.5 mg monotherapy reduced ambulatory blood pressure to a greater extent than placebo. The ABPM data demonstrate that 2.5 mg indapamide produces an additional reduction in diastolic blood pressure when combined with fixed doses of diltiazem XR (120, 180, and 240 mg). The reduction was consistent over the entire 24-hour recording period for all combinations. Compared with monotherapy groups, higher therapeutic response rates (SuDBP < or = 90 mm Hg or Delta SuDBP > or = 10 mm Hg decrease from baseline) were also observed with combination therapy. Office blood pressure data qualitatively and quantitatively supported the observations made from the ABPM data. There were no unexpected adverse events or side-effect trends and no dose-response or clinically significant laboratory, ECG, or physical examination adverse effects. The combination therapy regimens were well tolerated with safety profiles comparable with those of the individual therapies.
这项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行组研究评估了每日单剂量缓释地尔硫䓬(XR)和吲达帕胺单独及联合使用时,对255例男性和170例女性轻至中度高血压患者的疗效和安全性。通过诊室手动测量血压以及24小时动态血压监测(ABPM)技术评估血压。治疗组间疗效比较基于ABPM图表以及双盲治疗6周后仰卧位收缩压(SuSBP)和舒张压(SuDBP)较基线的变化。定期进行12导联心电图(ECG)、临床实验室检查和体格检查以评估安全性。地尔硫䓬XR 180、240和360 mg以及吲达帕胺2.5 mg单药治疗降低动态血压的程度均大于安慰剂。ABPM数据表明,2.5 mg吲达帕胺与固定剂量的地尔硫䓬XR(120、180和240 mg)联合使用时,可进一步降低舒张压。所有联合用药方案在整个24小时记录期内降压效果均一致。与单药治疗组相比,联合治疗的治疗有效率更高(SuDBP≤90 mmHg或较基线舒张压降低≥10 mmHg)。诊室血压数据在定性和定量方面均支持ABPM数据的观察结果。未发现意外不良事件或副作用趋势,也未发现剂量反应或具有临床意义的实验室、ECG或体格检查不良反应。联合治疗方案耐受性良好,安全性与各单药治疗相当。