Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Japan.
Clin Ther. 2010 May;32(5):861-81. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2010.04.020.
In a previously reported randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study of the efficacy and tolerability of olmesartan medoxomil (OLM) and azelnidipine (AZL) combination therapy compared with monotherapy with each agent in Japanese patients with essential hypertension (the REZALT study), the use of a combination of OLM, an angiotensin II receptor blocker, plus AZL, a dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker, was associated with significantly greater reductions in office sitting blood pressure (BP) and 24-hour ambulatory BP compared with monotherapy with either agent, and was well tolerated.
This article reports the results from an a priori planned analysis and post hoc analyses of the diurnal BP and pulse rate (PR) profiles of OLM/AZL versus monotherapy with either agent from the REZALT study.
Male and female Japanese outpatients with essential hypertension were eligible if they met the following inclusion criteria: age > or = 20 years; systolic BP (SBP) > or = 140 to <180 mm Hg and diastolic BP (DBP) > or = 90 to <110 mm Hg; and 24-hour ambulatory SBP/DBP > or = 135/> or = 80 mm Hg. Patients were randomly assigned to receive OLM/AZL 10/8 mg, OLM/AZL 20/16 mg, OLM 20 mg, or AZL 16 mg, once daily for 12 weeks. The effectiveness of the treatments was assessed using 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) and PR, analyzed by time period (BP and PR, 24 hours, daytime [7 AM-<10 PM], nighttime [10 PM-<7 AM], and early morning [6 AM-<9 AM]; PR, morning [6 AM -<11 AM]) and dipping status at baseline (dippers [(Daytime BP - Nighttime BP)/Daytime BP > or = 10%] or nondippers [(Daytime BP - Nighttime BP)/Daytime BP <10%]).
A total of 867 patients were enrolled, and 862 randomized patients were included in the full analysis set (590 men, 272 women; mean age, 56.6 years). A total of 839 patients had assessable ABPM data (213, 211, 206, and 209 patients in the OLM/AZL 10/8 mg, OLM/AZL 20/16 mg, OLM, and AZL groups, respectively). No clinically significant between-group differences were observed in baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. Combination therapy was associated with significantly greater antihypertensive effects on 24-hour ABPM compared with either monotherapy in all of the time periods, as follows: SBP/DBP reductions with OLM/AZL 20/16 mg in the daytime, nighttime, and early morning were -22.6/-14.1, -21.2/-12.5, and -20.6/-11.9 mm Hg, respectively (all, P < 0.05 vs the other 3 treatment groups). The SBP/DBP reductions with OLM/AZL 10/8 mg (daytime, -18.2/-11.0 mm Hg; nighttime, -18.1/-10.0 mm Hg; and early morning, -15.6/-9.3 mm Hg) were also significantly greater than with OLM 20 mg (-11.8/-6.7, -12.8/-7.2, and -11.0/ -6.9 mm Hg, respectively; all, P < 0.01) and AZL 16 mg (-13.1/-7.8, -10.2/-5.5, and -9.9/-6.1 mm Hg; all, P < 0.001) in all of the time periods. The antihypertensive effects associated with OLM/AZL 10/8 mg or 20/16 mg were significantly greater than those with monotherapies regardless of dipping pattern at baseline (all, P < 0.05) in all of the time periods, with the exception of nighttime reduction with OLM/AZL 10/8 mg versus OLM in dippers. The numbers of patients who had any increase in BP were 12/213 (5.6%) with OLM/AZL 10/8 mg, 13/211 (6.2%) with OLM/AZL 20/16 mg, 35/206 (17.0%) with OLM, and 36/209 (17.2%) with AZL. The AZL-containing regimens were associated with reduced morning PR (mean [95% CI] changes from baseline to week 12: -1.5 beats/min [-2.5 to -0.4] with OLM/AZL 10/8 mg, -2.1 beats/min [-3.0 to -1.1] with OLM/AZL 20/16 mg, 0.4 beat/min [-0.5 to 1.3] with OLM, and -1.9 beats/min [-2.8 to -1.0] with AZL).
In this study in Japanese patients with essential hypertension, the reductions in daytime, nighttime, and early-morning BP assessed using 24-hour ABPM were significantly greater with combination OLM/AZL than with either monotherapy, regardless of dipping pattern at baseline. Japan Pharmaceutical Information Center registration number: JapicCTI-060286.
在一项先前报道的、评估奥美沙坦酯(OLM)与阿折地平(AZL)联合治疗方案与两种药物单药治疗方案在日本原发性高血压患者中的疗效和耐受性的随机、双盲、平行组研究(REZALT 研究)中,与单药治疗相比,使用 OLM(血管紧张素 II 受体阻滞剂)加 AZL(二氢吡啶钙通道阻滞剂)的联合治疗方案可显著降低诊室坐位血压(BP)和 24 小时动态血压(ABP),且耐受性良好。
本文报告了一项预先计划的分析和事后分析的结果,即 OLM/AZL 联合治疗与两种药物单药治疗方案对 REZALT 研究中患者的日间血压(BP)和脉搏率(PR)的影响。
符合以下纳入标准的日本门诊原发性高血压男性和女性患者可入组:年龄≥20 岁;收缩压(SBP)≥140mmHg 且<180mmHg,舒张压(DBP)≥90mmHg 且<110mmHg;24 小时 ABP 中 SBP/DBP≥135mmHg/≥80mmHg。患者被随机分配接受 OLM/AZL 10/8mg、OLM/AZL 20/16mg、OLM 20mg 或 AZL 16mg,每日 1 次,共 12 周。通过 24 小时 ABP 监测(ABPM)和 PR 评估治疗效果,通过时间段(BP 和 PR,24 小时、白天[7 AM-<10 PM]、夜间[10 PM-<7 AM]和清晨[6 AM-<9 AM];PR,上午[6 AM-<11 AM])和基线时的血压下降情况(昼夜血压差值与白天血压的比值>或=10%为杓型,<10%为非杓型)进行评估。
共纳入 867 例患者,862 例随机患者纳入全分析集(590 例男性,272 例女性;平均年龄 56.6 岁)。839 例患者有可评估的 ABPM 数据(OLM/AZL 10/8mg、OLM/AZL 20/16mg、OLM 和 AZL 组分别有 213、211、206 和 209 例患者)。基线时的人口统计学和临床特征在各组间无显著差异。与两种药物单药治疗相比,联合治疗在所有时间段均显示出更显著的降压效果,如下:OLM/AZL 20/16mg 在白天、夜间和清晨的 SBP/DBP 降低分别为-22.6/-14.1mmHg、-21.2/-12.5mmHg 和-20.6/-11.9mmHg(均 P<0.05)。OLM/AZL 10/8mg 的 SBP/DBP 降低(白天-18.2/-11.0mmHg,夜间-18.1/-10.0mmHg,清晨-15.6/-9.3mmHg)也明显大于 OLM 20mg(分别为-11.8/-6.7mmHg、-12.8/-7.2mmHg 和-11.0/-6.9mmHg,均 P<0.01)和 AZL 16mg(分别为-13.1/-7.8mmHg、-10.2/-5.5mmHg 和-9.9/-6.1mmHg;均 P<0.001)。无论基线时的血压下降模式如何(所有 P<0.05),OLM/AZL 10/8mg 或 20/16mg 的降压效果均明显优于单药治疗。除了 OLM/AZL 10/8mg 与 OLM 治疗夜间降压效果的杓型比较外,与单药治疗相比,OLM/AZL 10/8mg 或 20/16mg 的夜间降压效果差异无统计学意义。出现任何血压升高的患者数量分别为:OLM/AZL 10/8mg 组 12/213(5.6%),OLM/AZL 20/16mg 组 13/211(6.2%),OLM 组 35/206(17.0%)和 AZL 组 36/209(17.2%)。AZL 组的方案与清晨 PR 降低相关(从基线到第 12 周的平均[95%CI]变化:OLM/AZL 10/8mg 组为-1.5 次/分[-2.5 至-0.4],OLM/AZL 20/16mg 组为-2.1 次/分[-3.0 至-1.1],OLM 组为 0.4 次/分[-0.5 至 1.3],AZL 组为-1.9 次/分[-2.8 至-1.0])。
在这项研究中,使用 24 小时 ABPM 评估的白天、夜间和清晨血压降低幅度,与两种药物单药治疗相比,联合 OLM/AZL 治疗更为显著,无论基线时的血压下降模式如何。日本医药信息中心注册编号:JapicCTI-060286。