Rost K, Nutting P, Smith J, Werner J, Duan N
Center for Studies in Family Medicine, Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colo 80220, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Mar;16(3):143-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2001.00537.x.
To determine whether redefining primary care team roles would improve outcomes for patients beginning a new treatment episode for major depression.
Following stratification, 6 of 12 practices were randomly assigned to the intervention condition. Intervention effectiveness was evaluated by patient reports of 6-month change in 100-point depression symptom and functional status scales.
Twelve community primary care practices across the country employing no onsite mental health professional.
Using two-stage screening, practices enrolled 479 depressed adult patients (73.4% of those eligible); 90.2% completed six-month follow-up.
Two primary care physicians, one nurse, and one administrative staff member in each intervention practice received brief training to improve the detection and management of major depression.
In patients beginning a new treatment episode, the intervention improved depression symptoms by 8.2 points (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.2 to 16.1; P =.04). Within this group, the intervention improved depression symptoms by 16.2 points (95% CI, 4.5 to 27.9; P =.007), physical role functioning by 14.1 points (95% CI, 1.1 to 29.2; P =.07), and satisfaction with care (P =.02) for patients who reported antidepressant medication was an acceptable treatment at baseline. Patients already in treatment at enrollment did not benefit from the intervention.
In practices without onsite mental health professionals, brief interventions training primary care teams to assume redefined roles can significantly improve depression outcomes in patients beginning a new treatment episode. Such interventions should target patients who report that antidepressant medication is an acceptable treatment for their condition. More research is needed to determine how primary care teams can best sustain these redefined roles over time.
确定重新界定基层医疗团队的角色是否会改善开始重度抑郁症新治疗阶段的患者的治疗效果。
分层后,12家医疗机构中的6家被随机分配到干预组。通过患者报告的100分抑郁症状和功能状态量表6个月的变化来评估干预效果。
全国12家社区基层医疗诊所,均未配备现场心理健康专业人员。
通过两阶段筛查,这些诊所招募了479名成年抑郁症患者(占符合条件者的73.4%);90.2%的患者完成了6个月的随访。
每个干预诊所的两名基层医疗医生、一名护士和一名行政人员接受了简短培训,以改善对重度抑郁症的检测和管理。
在开始新治疗阶段的患者中,干预使抑郁症状改善了8.2分(95%置信区间[CI],0.2至16.1;P = 0.04)。在该组中,对于基线时报告抗抑郁药物是可接受治疗的患者,干预使抑郁症状改善了16.2分(95%CI,4.5至27.9;P = 0.007),身体角色功能改善了14.1分(95%CI,1.1至29.2;P = 0.07),护理满意度提高(P = 0.02)。入组时已在接受治疗的患者未从干预中获益。
在没有现场心理健康专业人员的诊所中,对基层医疗团队进行简短干预培训以使其承担重新界定的角色,可显著改善开始新治疗阶段患者的抑郁治疗效果。此类干预应针对报告抗抑郁药物是其病情可接受治疗的患者。需要更多研究来确定基层医疗团队如何随着时间推移最好地维持这些重新界定的角色。