• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

醋酸铅和氯化镉因直接的DNA-金属相互作用而诱导遗传毒性损伤的能力如何?

Is the capacity of lead acetate and cadmium chloride to induce genotoxic damage due to direct DNA-metal interaction?

作者信息

Valverde M, Trejo C, Rojas E

机构信息

Departamento de Genética y Toxicología Ambiental, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas and Instituto de Fisiología Celular, UNAM Ciudad Universitaria, CP 04510, México D.F., Mexico.

出版信息

Mutagenesis. 2001 May;16(3):265-70. doi: 10.1093/mutage/16.3.265.

DOI:10.1093/mutage/16.3.265
PMID:11320153
Abstract

Even though the toxic effects of lead and cadmium compounds have been studied over many years, inconsistent results have been obtained about their mutagenic, clastogenic and carcinogenic properties. However, these metals are considered to be potential human carcinogens. The mechanism of metal-induced carcinogenesis is still unknown, but one possible pathway may involve the interaction of metals with DNA, either directly or indirectly. In this work we explore the capacity of lead, cadmium or a mixture of both metals to interact with acellular DNA, by employing a variant of the comet assay. Our results, using low non-cytotoxic metal concentrations (0.01, 0.1 and 1.0 microM) with the standard protocol for the acellular assay, showed an induction of DNA damage in cells of all organs studied; however, basal DNA damage was different in each organ. To confirm that we were working with pure DNA, proteinase K was added to the lysis solution. With this enriched-lysis solution we found a negative response in the induction of DNA damage in cells derived from the liver, kidney and lung of CD-1 male mice. To support the results obtained by the enriched-acellular assay, we studied the capacity of lead and cadmium (0.1 microM) to induce breaks in pooled genomic DNA in cells of the same organs, with negative results. Consistent with these findings, these metals do not induce DNA breaks in the plasmid pUSE amp+. On the whole, we did not detect direct induction of DNA strand breaks by lead acetate, cadmium chloride or a mixture of both metals, all at low non-cytotoxic concentrations. However, we found an induction of lipid peroxidation and an increase in free radical levels in the different organs of CD-1 male mice after inhalation of lead acetate (0.0068 microg/cc) or cadmium chloride (0.08 microg/cc) for 1 h, suggesting the induction of genotoxicity and carcinogenicity by indirect interactions, such as oxidative stress.

摘要

尽管铅和镉化合物的毒性作用已研究多年,但关于它们的致突变性、染色体断裂性和致癌性,研究结果并不一致。然而,这些金属被认为是潜在的人类致癌物。金属诱导致癌的机制尚不清楚,但一种可能的途径可能涉及金属与DNA直接或间接的相互作用。在这项工作中,我们采用彗星试验的一种变体,探索铅、镉或这两种金属的混合物与无细胞DNA相互作用的能力。我们使用低非细胞毒性金属浓度(0.01、0.1和1.0微摩尔)并按照无细胞试验的标准方案进行实验,结果显示在所研究的所有器官的细胞中均诱导了DNA损伤;然而,每个器官的基础DNA损伤情况不同。为了确认我们处理的是纯DNA,在裂解液中加入了蛋白酶K。使用这种富集裂解液,我们发现CD - 1雄性小鼠肝脏、肾脏和肺细胞的DNA损伤诱导呈阴性反应。为了支持富集无细胞试验获得的结果,我们研究了铅和镉(0.1微摩尔)诱导相同器官细胞中汇集的基因组DNA断裂的能力,结果为阴性。与这些发现一致,这些金属不会诱导质粒pUSE amp +中的DNA断裂。总体而言,我们未检测到低非细胞毒性浓度的醋酸铅、氯化镉或这两种金属的混合物直接诱导DNA链断裂。然而,我们发现吸入醋酸铅(0.0068微克/立方厘米)或氯化镉(0.08微克/立方厘米)1小时后,CD - 1雄性小鼠不同器官中的脂质过氧化作用增强,自由基水平升高,这表明通过氧化应激等间接相互作用诱导了遗传毒性和致癌性。

相似文献

1
Is the capacity of lead acetate and cadmium chloride to induce genotoxic damage due to direct DNA-metal interaction?醋酸铅和氯化镉因直接的DNA-金属相互作用而诱导遗传毒性损伤的能力如何?
Mutagenesis. 2001 May;16(3):265-70. doi: 10.1093/mutage/16.3.265.
2
Induction of genotoxicity by cadmium chloride inhalation in several organs of CD-1 mice.通过吸入氯化镉对CD-1小鼠多个器官进行遗传毒性诱导。
Mutagenesis. 2000 Mar;15(2):109-14. doi: 10.1093/mutage/15.2.109.
3
Genotoxicity induced in CD-1 mice by inhaled lead: differential organ response.
Mutagenesis. 2002 Jan;17(1):55-61. doi: 10.1093/mutage/17.1.55.
4
In vitro genotoxicity of lead acetate: induction of single and double DNA strand breaks and DNA-protein cross-links.醋酸铅的体外遗传毒性:诱导单链和双链DNA断裂及DNA-蛋白质交联
Mutat Res. 2003 Mar 3;535(2):127-39. doi: 10.1016/s1383-5718(02)00295-4.
5
Protective effect of boric acid on lead- and cadmium-induced genotoxicity in V79 cells.硼酸对铅和镉诱导的V79细胞遗传毒性的保护作用。
Arch Toxicol. 2014 Jun;88(6):1281-9. doi: 10.1007/s00204-014-1235-5. Epub 2014 Apr 8.
6
In vivo Comet assay on isolated kidney cells to distinguish genotoxic carcinogens from epigenetic carcinogens or cytotoxic compounds.对分离的肾细胞进行体内彗星试验,以区分遗传毒性致癌物与表观遗传致癌物或细胞毒性化合物。
Mutat Res. 2007 Jun 15;630(1-2):28-41. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2007.02.010. Epub 2007 Apr 19.
7
DNA damage by cadmium and arsenic salts assessed by the single cell gel electrophoresis assay.通过单细胞凝胶电泳试验评估镉盐和砷盐对DNA的损伤。
Mutat Res. 2001 Nov 15;498(1-2):47-55. doi: 10.1016/s1383-5718(01)00266-2.
8
Cadmium Chloride Induces DNA Damage and Apoptosis of Human Liver Carcinoma Cells via Oxidative Stress.氯化镉通过氧化应激诱导人肝癌细胞的DNA损伤和凋亡。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Jan 2;13(1):88. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13010088.
9
Chronic exposure to lead and cadmium pollution results in genomic instability in a model biomonitor species (Apodemus flavicollis Melchior, 1834).慢性暴露于铅和镉污染会导致模式生物监测物种(黑线姬鼠)的基因组不稳定。
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2020 May;194:110413. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.110413. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
10
In vivo genotoxic effect of cadmium chloride in mice leukocytes using comet assay.利用彗星试验研究氯化镉对小鼠白细胞的体内遗传毒性作用。
Teratog Carcinog Mutagen. 2001;21(5):325-33. doi: 10.1002/tcm.1020.

引用本文的文献

1
The dynamic face of cadmium-induced Carcinogenesis: Mechanisms, emerging trends, and future directions.镉诱导致癌作用的动态面貌:机制、新趋势及未来方向。
Curr Res Toxicol. 2024 Apr 4;6:100166. doi: 10.1016/j.crtox.2024.100166. eCollection 2024.
2
Multi-endpoint analysis of cadmium chloride-induced genotoxicity shows role for reactive oxygen species and p53 activation in DNA damage induction, cell cycle irregularities, and cell size aberrations.氯化镉诱导遗传毒性的多靶点分析表明,活性氧物质和 p53 激活在 DNA 损伤诱导、细胞周期异常和细胞大小畸变中起作用。
Mutagenesis. 2024 Feb 8;39(1):13-23. doi: 10.1093/mutage/gead025.
3
Untargeted LC-MS/MS-Based Metabolomic Profiling for the Edible and Medicinal Plant Under Different Levels of Cadmium Stress.
基于非靶向液相色谱-串联质谱法的可食用和药用植物在不同镉胁迫水平下的代谢组学分析
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Jul 28;13:889370. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.889370. eCollection 2022.
4
Role of Ape1 in Impaired DNA Repair Capacity in Battery Recycling Plant Workers Exposed to Lead.Ape1 在受铅污染的电池回收厂工人 DNA 修复能力受损中的作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 29;19(13):7961. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19137961.
5
Improving plant-based genotoxicity bioassay through AFLP technique for trace metal-contaminated water: insights from Myriophyllum aquaticum (Vell.) Verdc. and Cd.利用 AFLP 技术提高基于植物的遗传毒性生物测定在痕量金属污染水中的应用:来自水蕹菜(Vell.)Verdc.和 Cd 的见解。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jul;29(35):52752-52760. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19429-y. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
6
Construction of Mode of Action for Cadmium-Induced Renal Tubular Dysfunction Based on a Toxicity Pathway-Oriented Approach.基于毒性途径导向方法构建镉诱导肾小管功能障碍的作用模式
Front Genet. 2021 Jul 23;12:696892. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.696892. eCollection 2021.
7
Inhibitory activity of flaxseed oil against CdCl induced liver and kidney damage: Histopathology, genotoxicity, and gene expression study.亚麻籽油对氯化镉诱导的肝肾损伤的抑制作用:组织病理学、遗传毒性及基因表达研究
Toxicol Rep. 2020 Aug 31;7:1127-1137. doi: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2020.08.023. eCollection 2020.
8
Mode of action-based risk assessment of genotoxic carcinogens.基于作用模式的遗传毒性致癌物风险评估。
Arch Toxicol. 2020 Jun;94(6):1787-1877. doi: 10.1007/s00204-020-02733-2. Epub 2020 Jun 15.
9
Activation of the Erk/MAPK signaling pathway is a driver for cadmium induced prostate cancer.Erk/MAPK 信号通路的激活是镉诱导前列腺癌的驱动因素。
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2020 Aug 15;401:115102. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2020.115102. Epub 2020 Jun 6.
10
Effects of the methanol root extract of Carpolobia lutea on sperm indices, acrosome reaction, and sperm DNA integrity in cadmium-induced reproductive toxicity in male Wistar rats.镉诱导雄性 Wistar 大鼠生殖毒性中,贯叶连翘甲醇根提取物对精子指数、顶体反应和精子 DNA 完整性的影响。
JBRA Assist Reprod. 2020 Oct 6;24(4):454-465. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20200036.