Schaffer H R
Child Dev. 1975 Mar;46(1):290-1.
Rubenstein's failure to find evidence for the previously suggested lack of concordance between visual and manipulative responses to novel and familiar stimuli in 6-month-old infants is discussed. It is shown that a lack of concordance is not specific to the use of 1 measure of manipulative behavior, and other possible explanations for the discrepancy in findings are examined. A 2-stage development of responsiveness to familiarity-novelty in infancy remains the most plausible account.
本文讨论了鲁宾斯坦未能找到证据支持先前提出的6个月大婴儿对新异和熟悉刺激的视觉与操作反应之间缺乏一致性的观点。研究表明，缺乏一致性并非特定于使用某种操作行为测量方法，并且还探讨了研究结果差异的其他可能解释。婴儿对熟悉-新异的反应分两个阶段发展仍然是最合理的解释。
