Grose J H, Hall J W, Buss E, Hatch D
Division of Otolaryngology/Head & Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 27599-7070, USA.
J Acoust Soc Am. 2001 Apr;109(4):1587-95. doi: 10.1121/1.1354983.
Detection thresholds for temporal gaps between markers of dissimilar frequency are usually elevated with respect to thresholds for gaps between markers of similar frequency. Because gaps between markers of dissimilar frequency represent both a spectrally based perceptual discontinuity as well as a temporal discontinuity, it is not clear what factors underlie the threshold elevation. This study sought to examine the effects of perceptual dissimilarities on gap detection. The first experiment measured gap detection for configurations of narrow-band gap markers comprised of pure tones, frequency-modulated tones, and amplitude-modulated tones. The results showed that gap thresholds for frequency-disparate pure-tone markers were elevated with respect to isofrequency tonal markers, but that perceptual discontinuities between markers restricted to the same frequency region did not uniformly elevate threshold. The second experiment measured gap detection for configurations of markers where the leading and trailing markers could differ along the dimensions of bandwidth, duration, and pitch. The results showed that, in most cases, gap detection deteriorated when the bandwidth of the two markers differed, even when the spectral content of the narrower-band marker was completely subsumed by the spectral content of the wider-band marker. This finding suggests that gap detection is sensitive to spectral dissimilarity between markers in addition to spectral discontinuity. The effects of marker duration depended on the marker bandwidth. Pitch differences across spectrally similar markers had no effect.
频率不同的标记之间的时间间隔检测阈值通常相对于频率相同的标记之间的间隔阈值有所提高。由于频率不同的标记之间的间隔既代表基于频谱的感知不连续性,也代表时间上的不连续性,因此尚不清楚阈值提高的背后因素是什么。本研究旨在考察感知差异对间隔检测的影响。第一个实验测量了由纯音、调频音和调幅音组成的窄带间隔标记配置的间隔检测。结果表明,频率不同的纯音标记的间隔阈值相对于同频率音调标记有所提高,但限于同一频率区域的标记之间的感知不连续性并没有一致地提高阈值。第二个实验测量了前导和尾随标记在带宽、持续时间和音高维度上可能不同的标记配置的间隔检测。结果表明,在大多数情况下,当两个标记的带宽不同时,间隔检测会变差,即使窄带标记的频谱内容完全被宽带标记的频谱内容所包含。这一发现表明,间隔检测除了对标记之间的频谱不连续性敏感外,还对标记之间的频谱差异敏感。标记持续时间的影响取决于标记带宽。频谱相似的标记之间的音高差异没有影响。