• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Subject positions theory -- its application to understanding collaboration (and confrontation) in critical care.

作者信息

Sundin-Huard D

机构信息

Department of Nursing, Faculty of Sciences, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

J Adv Nurs. 2001 May;34(3):376-82. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01766.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01766.x
PMID:11328443
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Doctors and nurses do not usually take a collaborative approach to the ethical challenges of the critical care environment. This leads to the stresses that produce moral anguish and burnout -- both for nursing and medical staff. A more collegial relationship between nurses and physicians should improve patient care. If we are to promote this collegiality, one way to proceed is to investigate the interactions between health care professionals in order to develop an understanding of the barriers to, and supports for collaboration.

AIM

Subject positions theory offers a method of explaining and elucidating the interactions between nurse and physician in terms of power dynamics, mutual expectations and the discourse available to each individual. This paper aims to demonstrate how subject positions theory can facilitate the interpretation of the interactions between health professionals in terms of the power dynamics influencing those interactions.

DISCUSSION

This paper will use the example of a case study from my own research to demonstrate the application of this theory and its usefulness in the analysis of the interactions between health care professionals.

CONCLUSIONS

Application of this theory is used to demonstrate the author's argument that the current political and cultural structure of the health care system does not support the subject position - nurse advocate.

摘要

相似文献

1
Subject positions theory -- its application to understanding collaboration (and confrontation) in critical care.
J Adv Nurs. 2001 May;34(3):376-82. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01766.x.
2
Collaboration at risk: registered nurses' experiences on orthopaedic wards.面临风险的协作:注册护士在骨科病房的经历
J Clin Nurs. 2008 Jul;17(14):1907-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.02213.x.
3
Nurse-physician collaboration on medical-surgical units.内科-外科病房护士与医生的协作。
Medsurg Nurs. 2008 Feb;17(1):35-40.
4
Nurse-doctor relationships: conflict, competition or collaboration.护士与医生的关系:冲突、竞争还是合作。
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2000 Jun;16(3):127-8. doi: 10.1054/iccn.2000.1510.
5
Relationships between nurse executives and physicians: the gender paradox in healthcare.
J Nurs Adm. 2000 Jul-Aug;30(7-8):373-8. doi: 10.1097/00005110-200007000-00012.
6
Governing time in operating rooms.手术室的管理时间
J Clin Nurs. 2006 May;15(5):546-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01362.x.
7
Doctors' and nurses' perceptions of ethical problems in end-of-life decisions.医生和护士对临终决策中伦理问题的看法。
J Adv Nurs. 2001 Mar;33(6):707-15. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01710.x.
8
The interplay of knowledge and decision making between nurses and doctors in critical care.重症监护中护士与医生之间知识与决策的相互作用。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2001 Apr;38(2):129-40. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7489(00)00055-9.
9
Moral distress, advocacy and burnout: theorizing the relationships.道德困扰、维权倡导与职业倦怠:理论化三者之间的关系
Int J Nurs Pract. 1999 Mar;5(1):8-13. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-172x.1999.00143.x.
10
Nurse-doctor interactions during critical care ward rounds.重症监护病房查房期间护士与医生的互动。
J Clin Nurs. 2001 Jul;10(4):442-50. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2702.2001.00504.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Self-reported patient safety competence among new graduates in medicine, nursing and pharmacy.医学、护理和药学专业新毕业生自我报告的患者安全能力。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Feb;22(2):147-54. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001308. Epub 2012 Nov 23.