Breda C S
Center for Mental Health Policy, Vanderbilt Institute for Public Policy Studies, Vanderbilt University, 1207 18th Avenue South, Nashville, TN 37212, USA.
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2001 Feb;28(1):89-95. doi: 10.1007/BF02287237.
Effective systems of care for youth with emotional disorders require shared values among stakeholders toward a variety of mental health issues. Juvenile courts represent one stakeholder group whose values can affect the delivery of services to young offenders with or at risk of emotional disturbances. This research uses statewide data from Tennessee to assess the mental health orientation (MHO) of juvenile courts, their use of treatment options for offenders, and whether MHO influences the treatment referral decision. Results show that courts have a positive MHO, but this subjective orientation does not correspond to higher treatment referral rates. Moreover, service referrals are at a considerably lower rate than estimates of need for this population of youth would predict. While positive MHO suggests a basis for nurturing the shared vision required for effective systems of care, other factors must be considered to account for courts' underutilization of treatment options for juvenile offenders.
针对患有情绪障碍的青少年的有效护理系统,要求利益相关者就各种心理健康问题达成共同价值观。少年法庭是一个利益相关者群体,其价值观会影响为有情绪障碍或有情绪障碍风险的少年罪犯提供服务。本研究利用田纳西州的全州数据,评估少年法庭的心理健康取向(MHO)、其对罪犯治疗选项的使用情况,以及MHO是否会影响治疗转介决定。结果表明,法庭具有积极的MHO,但这种主观取向与更高的治疗转介率并不对应。此外,服务转介率远低于根据该青少年群体的需求估计所预测的水平。虽然积极的MHO为培育有效护理系统所需的共同愿景提供了基础,但必须考虑其他因素,以解释法庭对少年罪犯治疗选项利用不足的情况。