Figueredo E, Villalonga A
Servicio de Anestesiología y Reanimación. Hospital Torrecárdenas. Almería Facultativo Especialista de Area.
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2001 Mar;48(3):106-12.
OBJECTIVE: To identify publications by Spanish anesthesiologists in journals indexed by Journal Citation Report from 1991 through 1996; to count the number of citations received and compare the results with the impact factor (IF) of the journals in which they were published. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Articles for which the first author was a member of a Spanish anesthesiology department were searched for in MEDLINE, Science Citation Index and EMBASE. Only publications for which the IF was known were included for analysis. We then counted the number of citations each article received over the two years following publication, recording the source journal in which the citation appeared and country of origin of each citing author. We then calculated the real IF (RIF) of each article, the RIF of all the Spanish articles, and the mean RIF. Also calculated for each article was the expected IF (EIF), based on the IF of the source journal, the overall EIF and the mean EIF. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-two articles were published; 49 of them were letters to the editors. Specialist anesthesiology journals published 72.7%. A total of 186 citations were received. American authors cited the articles more often than did other Spanish authors. Thirty-seven citations (19.9%) were self-citations. Ninety-two articles (53.5%) were never cited. With letters to the editor excluded, the RIF was 85.48 and the global EIF was 213.28; the mean EIF was 1.734 and the RIF was 0.695. Therefore, the rate of citation of the Spanish authors in the period studied was only 40% of the citation rate of the entire population of authors from all countries. The authors of the published articles worked mainly in hospitals in Barcelona, Madrid, La Coruña, Valencia, Cantabria and Murcia. Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol (Badalona, Barcelona) had the largest number of publications and the highest EIF (39.41). Hospital del Mar (Barcelona) had the highest mean RIF and the highest global RIF.A gradual increase in the annual productivity of Spanish scientists can be discerned in a progressive increase in the number of publications as well as their EIF and RIF. CONCLUSIONS: Research by Spanish anesthesiologists is concentrated in only a few hospitals. Although the number of publications is increasing, their international repercussion has still not reached the desired level.
目的：识别1991年至1996年西班牙麻醉医师在《期刊引证报告》索引期刊上发表的论文；统计所获引用次数，并将结果与论文发表期刊的影响因子（IF）进行比较。 材料与方法：在MEDLINE、《科学引文索引》和EMBASE中搜索第一作者为西班牙麻醉科成员的文章。仅纳入已知IF的出版物进行分析。然后统计每篇文章发表后两年内获得的引用次数，记录引用出现的源期刊以及每位引用作者的原籍国。接着计算每篇文章的实际IF（RIF）、所有西班牙文章的RIF以及平均RIF。还基于源期刊的IF、总体预期IF（EIF）和平均EIF为每篇文章计算预期IF。 结果：共发表172篇文章；其中49篇为给编辑的信。麻醉学专业期刊发表了72.7%。共获得186次引用。美国作者比其他西班牙作者更频繁地引用这些文章。37次引用（19.9%）为自引。92篇文章（53.5%）从未被引用。排除给编辑的信后，RIF为85.48，总体EIF为213.28；平均EIF为1.734，RIF为0.695。因此，在所研究期间西班牙作者的被引用率仅为所有国家作者总被引用率的40%。发表文章的作者主要在巴塞罗那、马德里、拉科鲁尼亚、巴伦西亚、坎塔布里亚和穆尔西亚的医院工作。德国人特里亚斯·伊·普约尔医院（巴塞罗那巴达洛纳）发表的文章数量最多，EIF最高（39.41）。海洋医院（巴塞罗那）的平均RIF和总体RIF最高。从发表文章数量以及它们的EIF和RIF的逐步增加可以看出西班牙科学家的年生产力在逐渐提高。 结论：西班牙麻醉医师的研究仅集中在少数几家医院。尽管发表文章的数量在增加，但其国际影响力仍未达到理想水平。
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2001-3
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2004-10
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2002
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2003-1
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 1999-11
Med Clin (Barc). 1997-10-18
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 1999-11
Zotero 插件