Suppr超能文献

院外心脏骤停时采用低能量双相截断指数波形除颤后的患者预后。

Patient outcomes following defibrillation with a low energy biphasic truncated exponential waveform in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

作者信息

White R D, Hankins D G, Atkinson E J

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

出版信息

Resuscitation. 2001 Apr;49(1):9-14. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(00)00338-5.

Abstract

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE

To determine the outcome of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and ventricular fibrillation as the presenting rhythm while using automated external defibrillators (AEDs) that delivered non-escalating, impedance-compensated low-energy (150 J) shocks.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

AEDs delivering low-energy biphasic truncated exponential (BTE) shocks were employed in an emergency medical services (EMS) system in which first-arriving personnel - police, firefighters or paramedics - delivered the initial shocks. Patients were classified according to their response to shocks: restoration of sustained spontaneous circulation (ROSC) without need for epinephrine and other advanced life support (ALS) interventions; and ALS, those requiring epinephrine in all instances. The primary end-point was neurologically-intact discharge survival. Secondary end-points were ROSC with shocks only and the call-to-shock time interval.

RESULTS

Of 42 patients with VF arrest treated with BTE shocks, 35 were bystander-witnessed. Of these 35, 14 (38%) regained a sustained ROSC on-scene with shocks only, needing no epinephrine for ROSC. All 14 survived to discharge home. Of the remaining 21 patients needing ALS intervention, only two (9.5%) survived to discharge. Overall, 16/35 patients (46%) survived to discharge home, an outcome comparable to our experience with patients treated with escalating high-energy monophasic waveform shocks.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-energy (150 J) non-escalating biphasic truncated exponential waveform shocks terminate VF in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with high efficacy; patient outcome is comparable with that observed with escalating high-energy monophasic shocks. Low-energy shocks, in addition to high efficacy, may confer the advantage of less shock-induced myocardial dysfunction, though this will be difficult to define in the clinical circumstance of long-duration VF provoked by a pre-existing diseased myocardial substrate.

摘要

主要目的

确定院外心脏骤停且初始心律为心室颤动的患者,在使用能提供非递增、阻抗补偿低能量(150焦耳)电击的自动体外除颤器(AED)时的治疗结果。

材料与方法

在一个紧急医疗服务(EMS)系统中使用能提供低能量双相截尾指数(BTE)电击的AED,该系统中最先到达的人员——警察、消防员或护理人员——进行初始电击。根据患者对电击的反应进行分类:恢复持续性自主循环(ROSC)且无需肾上腺素及其他高级生命支持(ALS)干预;以及ALS组,即所有情况下都需要肾上腺素的患者。主要终点是神经功能完好出院存活。次要终点是仅通过电击实现ROSC以及从呼叫到电击的时间间隔。

结果

在42例接受BTE电击治疗的室颤骤停患者中,35例有旁观者目睹。在这35例中,14例(38%)仅通过电击在现场恢复了持续性ROSC,恢复ROSC无需肾上腺素。所有14例均存活至出院回家。在其余21例需要ALS干预的患者中,只有2例(9.5%)存活至出院。总体而言,16/35例患者(46%)存活至出院回家,这一结果与我们对接受递增高能量单相波形电击治疗的患者的经验相当。

结论

低能量(150焦耳)非递增双相截尾指数波形电击能高效终止院外心脏骤停中的室颤;患者治疗结果与递增高能量单相电击观察到的结果相当。低能量电击除了高效之外,可能还具有较少电击诱发心肌功能障碍的优势,不过在由预先存在的患病心肌基质引发的长时间室颤的临床情况下,这将难以界定。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验