Gliner B E, Jorgenson D B, Poole J E, White R D, Kanz K G, Lyster T D, Leyde K W, Powers D J, Morgan C B, Kronmal R A, Bardy G H
Heartstream, Inc., Seattle, WA 98121, USA.
Biomed Instrum Technol. 1998 Nov-Dec;32(6):631-44.
Few victims of sudden cardiac arrest survive. A new generation of automatic external defibrillators (AEDs), smaller, lighter, easier to use, and less costly, makes the goal of widespread AED deployment and early defibrillation feasible. A low-energy impedance-compensating biphasic waveform allows AED device characteristics more suitable to the goal of early defibrillation than high-energy waveforms. This study observed the performance of such a biphasic waveform in the out-of-hospital setting on 100 consecutive victims of sudden cardiac arrest treated by a wide range of first-responders. AEDs incorporating 150-J impedance-compensating biphasic waveforms were placed into service of 34 EMS systems. Data were obtained from the AED PC data card-recording system. The first endpoint was to determine the effectiveness of this waveform in terminating ventricular fibrillation (VF). The second endpoint was to determine whether or not the use of such an AED culminated in an organized rhythm at the time of patient transfer to an advanced life support (ALS) team or emergency department (ED). The third endpoint was to assess the efficiency of the human-factors design of the AED by measuring user time intervals. The 34 sites provided data from 286 consecutive AED uses, 100 from SCA victims with VF as their initial rhythm upon attachment of the AED. All 286 patients were correctly identified by the AED as requiring a shock (100% sensitivity for the 100 VF patients) or not (100% specificity to the 186 patients not presenting in VF). Times from emergency call to first shock delivery averaged 9.1 +/- 7.3 minutes. A single 150-J biphasic shock defibrillated the initial VF episode in 86% of patients. For all 450 episodes of VF in these 100 patients, an average of 86% +/- 24% of VF episodes were terminated with a single biphasic shock. Of the 449 VF episodes that received up to three shocks, 97% +/- 11% were terminated with three shocks or fewer. The average number of shocks per VF episode was 1.3 +/- 0.7. The average time from AED power-on and pads attached to first defibrillation was 25 +/- 23 sec. At the time of patient transfer, an organized rhythm was present in 65% of the VF patients; asystole was the result in 25%, and VF was in progress in 10%. It is concluded that low-energy impedance-compensating biphasic waveforms terminate long-duration VF at high rates in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and provide defibrillation rates exceeding those previously achieved with high-energy shocks. Use of this waveform allows AED device characteristics consistent with widespread AED deployment and early defibrillation.
心脏骤停的受害者很少能存活下来。新一代自动体外除颤器(AED)体积更小、重量更轻、使用更简便且成本更低,使得广泛部署AED并尽早进行除颤的目标变得可行。与高能量波形相比,低能量阻抗补偿双相波更适合早期除颤这一目标。本研究观察了这种双相波在院外环境中对100例连续心脏骤停受害者的表现,这些受害者由各类急救人员进行救治。配备150焦耳阻抗补偿双相波的AED被投入34个急救医疗服务(EMS)系统使用。数据从AED的PC数据卡记录系统中获取。第一个终点是确定这种波形终止室颤(VF)的有效性。第二个终点是确定使用这样的AED在患者被转送至高级生命支持(ALS)团队或急诊科(ED)时是否能最终恢复有组织的心律。第三个终点是通过测量使用者的时间间隔来评估AED的人为因素设计效率。这34个地点提供了286次连续使用AED的数据,其中100次是针对心脏骤停受害者,他们在连接AED时最初的心律为室颤。AED正确识别了所有286例患者是否需要电击(对100例室颤患者的敏感度为100%)或不需要电击(对186例非室颤患者的特异度为100%)。从紧急呼叫到首次电击的平均时间为9.1±7.3分钟。单次150焦耳双相波电击使86%的患者的初始室颤发作终止。在这100例患者的所有450次室颤发作中,平均86%±24%的室颤发作通过单次双相波电击终止。在接受最多三次电击的449次室颤发作中,97%±11%在三次或更少电击后终止。每次室颤发作的平均电击次数为1.3±0.7次。从AED开机并贴上电极片到首次除颤的平均时间为25±23秒。在患者被转送至医院时,65%的室颤患者出现了有组织的心律;25%的患者出现心搏停止,10%的患者室颤仍在持续。结论是,低能量阻抗补偿双相波在院外心脏骤停中能以高比率终止长时间室颤,并提供超过此前高能量电击所达到的除颤率。使用这种波形使得AED的设备特性与广泛部署AED并尽早进行除颤相一致。